Re: [Ccnet-devel] [Ccnet-user] Switching to VS 2005

[Norman R. <no...@ra...>]

On 10/5/06, Daniel Piessens <dan...@gm...> wrote:
> I think we're getting our signals a bit crossed... I'm not implying that
> VS2005 needs to be installed on the box to compile your CC.NET source with
> the goal of simply having the latest version. I'm saying more that if we
> move the source to .NET 2.0 it will upgrade the structure of the web project
> to the ASP.NET 2.0 format and VS 2005 will be needed if you want a full IDE
> to develop in. If you like using notepad that's fine :-). Basically stating
> that you can't edit the project in VS 2003 after we migrate the project. Is
> that a fair statement?

I think this is easiest said as:

Does anyone mind if CC.NET source is upgraded to .Net framework 2.0?
This means that you won't be able to help contribute to the CC.NET
source code using VS 2003, but you will have to use VS 2005, or
notepad, or SharpDevelop instead.

Your existing projects written in .Net 1.0, .Net 1.1, and .Net 2.0
will continue to be built correctly as CC.NET tasks, so there's
nothing to worry about there - this change only affects people
altering the CC.NET source code.

-- 
- Norman Rasmussen
 - Email: no...@ra...
 - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/