From: Todd S. <ts...@op...> - 2008-01-02 23:48:33
|
Gary King <gw...@me...> writes: > Hi Todd, > > What Robert said. > >>> Doesn't ASDF already write all of its output to a particular stream, >>> namely *verbose-out*? > > Yes, ASDF sends _its_ output to *verbose-out* which will be *standard- > output* if you pass in :verbose t to the operate function (which is > the default). > >>> I guess I don't really understand the problem you're solving, and I'm >>> wondering why all the CLOS machinery is necessary... > > The CLOS machinery probably isn't necessary but it's damn fun <smile>. > More seriously, the machinery is there to allow customization on both > a per-system basis and a per-operation basis. I can imagine wanting to > save off compiler information separately from test information, for > example. I just replied to Robert, the essence of which is that I still don't quite see the need, and I think what's been proposed (as I understand it) won't work out the way you want. Maybe a full patch of what you're proposing would help. -- Todd Sabin <ts...@op...> |