From: <rpg...@re...> - 2006-10-17 17:14:33
|
>>>>> "CR" == Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes: CR> rpg...@re... writes: >> What I fear is that someone will sit down and bash out an a2sdf >> that will fragment the healthy consensus, without being a good >> enough improvement over the current asdf. CR> I think I probably should have mentioned: for me, the first CR> test that any a2sdf candidate must pass is for asdf CR> compatibility, so that current users have a smooth upgrade CR> path. (That is emphatically not the same as modifying asdf's CR> internals incompatibly, which to me seems definitely worse CR> than a fork with a different name; please, please, if you CR> change interfaces, don't reuse the name!) OK, then I think we're in agreement! I do think it would be worthwhile to collect some design suggestions and feature requests prior to commencing any such effort, though. I am very impressed with ASDF generally, but I'd like to see the next version come out of a process that would ensure improvement, rather than just difference. Best, R |