#1 little mistype in web page

[pascal21st]

http://ccif.sourceforge.net/modified-betza-notation.html

says that

"There exists some more enhanced versions of the Betza notation system, but none of them is sufficient in clarity and expressiveness, and all have a lack of ambiguity. "

(2. stanza)

Probably it should read instead :

" [...] and all should be without ambiguity. "

or likewise.

[Gregor Cramer]

The first error report!

Thanks for the report, proof reading is very welcome, I'm not a native English speaker.

I've changed the sentence

There exists some more enhanced versions of the Betza notation system, but none of them is sufficient in clarity and expressiveness, and all have a lack of ambiguity

to

There exists some more enhanced versions of the Betza notation system, but none of them is sufficient in clarity, expressiveness, and unambiguousness.

Gregor