Menu

#618 New EDR reporting format

2016July
Verified
None
High
Enhancement
2016
CBECCr
2016-05-28
2016-03-04
Ken Nittler
No

*** Both the display and the CF-1R format have been revised. See later posts. Also, EDR calculations different than below to do adjustment similar to RESNET ***

We need to revise both the EDR display at the end of a run and the CF-1R to reflect the new format from staff. The new format is attached as EDRBox.png and as a word file. Staff will be updating the language in the box to allow for the EDR going negative.

Scott: Energy Design Rating Screen should be changed to have the same values as the report in the yellow region of EDRFigure2. To assist in debugging with bypassrulelimits we should continue to have the detailed screen like EDRFigure1.

Robert: On the CF-1R, the 2013 EDR should never be displayed on any 2016 version. Also, for multiple orientations we should keep the format that has a line of data for each orientation.

Some of the numbers have changed. All quantities kTDV/ft2-yr.

EDR of the standard design = Standard Design Total Energy Use / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

EDR of the proposed design (no PV) = Proposed Design Total Energy Use without PV / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

EDR value of Proposed PV = (- Proposed Design PV) / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

Final EDR of Proposed Design = Proposed Design Total Energy Use / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

4 Attachments

Related

Tickets: #618

Discussion

  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-03-07

    Larry to provide reworded language deal with EDR can go negative. From email on 03/04:

    "The text says the score is from zero to 100. Right now, there is no lower limit in the software - the EDR can go negative when the PV is big enough. Should a lower limit of zero be added? Very good point. We will reword that in the table."

     
    • Larry Froess

      Larry Froess - 2016-03-07

      Sorry...attached is the latest wording / Table..

      -Larry

      From: Ken Nittler [mailto:kennittler@users.sf.net]
      Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:09 AM
      To: [cbecc-res:tickets]
      Subject: [cbecc-res:tickets] #618 New EDR reporting format

      Larry to provide reworded language deal with EDR can go negative. From email on 03/04:

      "The text says the score is from zero to 100. Right now, there is no lower limit in the software - the EDR can go negative when the PV is big enough. Should a lower limit of zero be added? Very good point. We will reword that in the table."


      [tickets:#618]https://sourceforge.net/p/cbecc-res/tickets/618/ New EDR reporting format

      Status: New
      Milestone: 2016March
      Created: Fri Mar 04, 2016 04:18 PM UTC by Ken Nittler
      Last Updated: Fri Mar 04, 2016 04:18 PM UTC
      Owner: Scott Criswell
      Attachments:

      We need to revise both the EDR display at the end of a run and the CF-1R to reflect the new format from staff. The new format is attached as EDRBox.png and as a word file. Staff will be updating the language in the box to allow for the EDR going negative.

      Scott: Energy Design Rating Screen should be changed to have the same values as the report in the yellow region of EDRFigure2. To assist in debugging with bypassrulelimits we should continue to have the detailed screen like EDRFigure1.

      Robert: On the CF-1R, the 2013 EDR should never be displayed on any 2016 version. Also, for multiple orientations we should keep the format that has a line of data for each orientation.

      Some of the numbers have changed. All quantities kTDV/ft2-yr.

      EDR of the standard design = Standard Design Total Energy Use / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

      EDR of the proposed design (no PV) = Proposed Design Total Energy Use without PV / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

      EDR value of Proposed PV = (- Proposed Design PV) / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100

      Final EDR of Proposed Design = Proposed Design Total Energy Use / Reference Design Total Energy Use x 100


      Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/cbecc-res/tickets/618/

      To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/

       

      Related

      Tickets: #618

  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-03-09

    Here is a newer version of the format from Mikey. This will likely need to change again with changes to EDR.

     
  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-03-15

    Here is the latest format for the CF-1R.

    The Energy Design Rating screen at the end of a run should display the kWh, therm and kTDV/ft2 values and the four EDR quantities as per call on 03/14/16.

     
  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-03-15
    • Description has changed:

    Diff:

    --- old
    +++ new
    @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
    +*** Both the display and the CF-1R format have been revised. See later posts. Also, EDR calculations different than below to do adjustment similar to RESNET ***
    +
     We need to revise both the EDR display at the end of a run and the CF-1R to reflect the new format from staff. The new format is attached as EDRBox.png and as a word file. Staff will be updating the language in the box to allow for the EDR going negative.
    
     Scott: Energy Design Rating Screen should be changed to have the same values as the report in the yellow region of EDRFigure2. To assist in debugging with bypassrulelimits we should continue to have the detailed screen like EDRFigure1.
    
     
  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-03-15

    Newest revision attached

     
  • Scott Criswell

    Scott Criswell - 2016-03-17
    • status: New --> Started
     
  • Scott Criswell

    Scott Criswell - 2016-03-17

    Commit checked into SVN @ [r470] providing data to populate the various design rating values referenced in the EDR report addition. Future ruleset mods will provide access to data to populate the Tier 1/2 checkboxes.
    All of these design rating data can be found in the "DesignRating" model of the analysis results, as follows:

    <model name="DesignRating">
    <proj>
    <name>1 Story Example EDR Simple PV</name>
    ...
    <resultsummary index="0">EUSummary</resultsummary>
    ...
    <eusesummary>
    <name>EUSummary</name>
    ...
    <designrating>3.10099</designrating> = Final EDR of Proposed Design
    <designratingnopv>52.0226</designratingnopv> = EDR of Proposed Design
    <designratingpvonly>48.9216</designratingpvonly> = EDR Value of Proposed PV
    <designratingstd>55.6784</designratingstd> = EDR of Standard Design</eusesummary></proj></model>

    and for Multi-orientation runs you will find:

    <model name="DesignRating">
    <proj>
    <name>1 Story Example EDR Simple PV</name>
    ...
    <resultsummary index="0">Worst Case (W)</resultsummary>
    <resultsummary index="1">North Facing</resultsummary> = North
    <resultsummary index="2">East Facing</resultsummary> = East
    <resultsummary index="3">South Facing</resultsummary> = South
    <resultsummary index="4">West Facing</resultsummary> = West
    ...
    w/ corresponding EUseSummary objects below by the names specified above...</proj></model>

     

    Related

    Commit: [r470]

  • Scott Criswell

    Scott Criswell - 2016-03-21
    • assigned_to: Scott Criswell --> Robert Scott
     
  • Scott Criswell

    Scott Criswell - 2016-03-21

    Final data model & ruleset mods committed to SVN @ r474, including:

    • for QII, check for HERSOther:QII > 0 (unchanged from previous versions)
    • for Tier 1 & 2, look for EUseSummary:MeetsTier1 & :MeetsTier2 > 0 and if/when Calgreen ZNE label is to be reported, look for :MeetsZNETier > 0. Note that these results are computed in Standard design, so you will find them in the analysis results XML under the Standard design (and also carried forward into the DesignRating model, when present) and also note that for multiple-orientation analysis, there is a unique EUseSummary object (and tier1/2/ZNE flags computed) for each of the orientations.

    Passing ownership over to RS to complete CF1R report mods.

     
    • Robert Scott

      Robert Scott - 2016-03-21

      -Added checkbox selections for QII, Tier1, Tier2 for EDR reporting, as per ruleset mods. Using values reported in EUseSummary/Name=Worst Case for multiple orientation analysis.

      -MeetsZNETier status flag not implemented in CF1R.

      Ready for general testing using 'real' case runs.

       

      Last edit: Robert Scott 2016-03-21
  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-04-15
    • status: Started --> Fixed
     
  • Ken Nittler

    Ken Nittler - 2016-04-15
    • status: Fixed --> Verified
     
MongoDB Logo MongoDB