|
From: Dave D. <dr...@cr...> - 2004-11-09 18:21:51
|
On Nov 9, 2004, at 10:17 AM, Jeffery A. Brush wrote: > Hi all, > > NAR has asked Avantia to "raiser the bar" on RETS compliance tests and > we're > looking for issues from users familiar with RETS Clients and Servers, > which > we can roll into one of the next rounds of RETS tests. Excellent! > The issues that have been recently mentioned on this list include: > 1. Bad case for capability url keys. > 2. Undocumented capability url keys. > 3. Incorrect logout response. > 4. Bad xml in the search results. > (This one is tricky to test for as we only see a subset of content.) As far as #4 goes... I wish we could test this somehow. Is there a way to force servers to pre-load some known data? Maybe utilize this for servers that support standard names or something? > If anyone has anything else they would like to see tested for on the > server > or client side, please let me know and I'll try to get it added to the > test > suite. Rigorous testing digest authentication would be nice. I can't tell you how many times I get questions regarding digest auth and problems some client writers tend to have. -Dave |