RE: [Caprice32-devel] Re: Linux binary package

[Ulrich D. <cap...@cy...>]

Stephane wrote:

> Ok, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing. The path you use =
is
> the current path that the shell uses, which doesn't take into account =
the
> path typed. For example if I do :
>
> [/home/steph/]$ ./caprice32/cap32
>
> The path is "/home/steph" and the config files aren't found. I'll have =
to
> dig, but there's a function that does this IIRC (i.e. find the path to
> the current binary).

Ok, I see your point. In that case we need the change the current =
behaviour.
If you find some way of determining the location of the application, you
should update the code in the main function accordingly.

Ulrich.