Re: [Canfestival-devel] Porting canfestival to the C2000 and the LGPL in embedded systems

[<can...@li...>]

Hello,

> > In particular the sticking point is section 6 in LGPL2.1 or
> > section 4.d in LGPL3.  Unless I’m misunderstanding something, it seems like
> > I would be required to provide an unlinked version of my application along
> > with the linking tools in order to be LGPL compliant.  Is that right?
> 
> No idea, sorry.  Anyhow, I believe that if ever one day some "LGPL
> enforcement agent" break your door, you will be able to provide him
> with an application.o and a canfestival.o to prove him you did 'just'
> link it. But who cares, really ?

I would like to see the freertos exception (very much) in canfestival,
too. I think it would be used more often, then.
At the moment, you violate the LGPL if you link statically to
canfestival and do not provide the whole source of you program.

-> Please add this exception.

Regards,
Christian