You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(31) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Nick S. <in...@in...> - 2014-01-15 10:42:12
|
Thanks Jason. CamStudio forum admin password has been changed as has FTP etc passwords on the server... Cheers Nick :o) On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Terry Leigh Britton < ter...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks, Jason - So, everyone - change your CamStudio forum password at the > very least, and perhaps other passwords as well. > > Terry > > *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for > responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * > > *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm... > > wrote: > >> I do computer security for a living these days, so I tend to react to the >> worst case scenario / paranoid side of things. That being said, this should >> be considered a serious security incident. >> >> If I downloaded and ran the malware from the link that was on the >> camstudio site, I would change all of my personal passwords. I don't know >> exactly which passwords it stole, but it could theoretically have stolen >> any you have saved anywhere on your computer or have typed in since them. >> If you ran the malware a good virus scan is probably in order as well. >> >> Even if you did NOT download and run the malware, you should still change >> the password you use for the camstudio forum. The attacker likely has >> access to the hashed version of this password, and using various techniques >> may recover the plaintext password. If you use your camstudio forum >> password with the same or similar email addresses on other sites, it would >> be a good idea to change your password on those other sites as well. >> >> Hope that helps, >> Jason >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < >> ter...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Jason, >>> >>> Well, Shiver me timbers to their raw bones! Guess I'd better change some >>> passwords - you do mean it grabs personal passwords from a user's machine, >>> correct? >>> >>> Terry >>> >>> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >>> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >>> >>> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend >>> one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jason Goodman < >>> jas...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Terry, >>>> >>>> I only looked into it long enough to verify it was not CamStudio and >>>> likely malicious. As best I could tell, it was flagged by all of the AVs >>>> using generic password grabbing signatures rather than a signature for a >>>> specific piece of malware. >>>> >>>> If I had to speculate, my guess of what happened is that an attacker >>>> discovered a vulnerability, or developed an exploit for a published >>>> vulnerability, on an outdated version of the forum software. They then >>>> performed manual or automated scans of the internet looking for vulnerable >>>> forums. They found CamStudio. My best guess is they used CVE-2013-3527 >>>> which enabled them to dump passwords from the forum. Was one of the admin >>>> passwords for the forum the same as used to access cPanel? Either way, they >>>> eventually gained access to the server and saw they could distribute >>>> malware via our download link. They used a generic application that stole >>>> saved passwords for as many applications as possible and shipped them back >>>> to the attacker. As best I can tell this password grabber does not have a >>>> well known name. >>>> >>>> Other Possible Forum Vulnerabilities: >>>> >>>> http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-11325/product_id-20496/Vanillaforums-Vanilla-Forums.html >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < >>>> ter...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jason, >>>>> >>>>> Could you tell which virus it was? >>>>> >>>>> Terry >>>>> >>>>> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >>>>> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >>>>> >>>>> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to >>>>> spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman < >>>>> jas...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> All, >>>>>> >>>>>> After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main >>>>>> download link on camstudio.org. >>>>>> >>>>>> It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download >>>>>> was replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>>>>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>>>>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>>>>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Camstudio-devs mailing list >>>>>> Cam...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Camstudio-devs mailing list > Cam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2014-01-15 04:51:58
|
Thanks, Jason - So, everyone - change your CamStudio forum password at the very least, and perhaps other passwords as well. Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm...>wrote: > I do computer security for a living these days, so I tend to react to the > worst case scenario / paranoid side of things. That being said, this should > be considered a serious security incident. > > If I downloaded and ran the malware from the link that was on the > camstudio site, I would change all of my personal passwords. I don't know > exactly which passwords it stole, but it could theoretically have stolen > any you have saved anywhere on your computer or have typed in since them. > If you ran the malware a good virus scan is probably in order as well. > > Even if you did NOT download and run the malware, you should still change > the password you use for the camstudio forum. The attacker likely has > access to the hashed version of this password, and using various techniques > may recover the plaintext password. If you use your camstudio forum > password with the same or similar email addresses on other sites, it would > be a good idea to change your password on those other sites as well. > > Hope that helps, > Jason > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < > ter...@gm...> wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> Well, Shiver me timbers to their raw bones! Guess I'd better change some >> passwords - you do mean it grabs personal passwords from a user's machine, >> correct? >> >> Terry >> >> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >> >> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend >> one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jason Goodman < >> jas...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Hi Terry, >>> >>> I only looked into it long enough to verify it was not CamStudio and >>> likely malicious. As best I could tell, it was flagged by all of the AVs >>> using generic password grabbing signatures rather than a signature for a >>> specific piece of malware. >>> >>> If I had to speculate, my guess of what happened is that an attacker >>> discovered a vulnerability, or developed an exploit for a published >>> vulnerability, on an outdated version of the forum software. They then >>> performed manual or automated scans of the internet looking for vulnerable >>> forums. They found CamStudio. My best guess is they used CVE-2013-3527 >>> which enabled them to dump passwords from the forum. Was one of the admin >>> passwords for the forum the same as used to access cPanel? Either way, they >>> eventually gained access to the server and saw they could distribute >>> malware via our download link. They used a generic application that stole >>> saved passwords for as many applications as possible and shipped them back >>> to the attacker. As best I can tell this password grabber does not have a >>> well known name. >>> >>> Other Possible Forum Vulnerabilities: >>> >>> http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-11325/product_id-20496/Vanillaforums-Vanilla-Forums.html >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < >>> ter...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> Jason, >>>> >>>> Could you tell which virus it was? >>>> >>>> Terry >>>> >>>> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >>>> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >>>> >>>> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to >>>> spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman < >>>> jas...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download >>>>> link on camstudio.org. >>>>> >>>>> It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. >>>>> >>>>> I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download >>>>> was replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. >>>>> >>>>> Jason >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>>>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>>>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>>>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>>>> >>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Camstudio-devs mailing list >>>>> Cam...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
|
From: Jason G. <jas...@gm...> - 2014-01-15 04:49:05
|
I do computer security for a living these days, so I tend to react to the worst case scenario / paranoid side of things. That being said, this should be considered a serious security incident. If I downloaded and ran the malware from the link that was on the camstudio site, I would change all of my personal passwords. I don't know exactly which passwords it stole, but it could theoretically have stolen any you have saved anywhere on your computer or have typed in since them. If you ran the malware a good virus scan is probably in order as well. Even if you did NOT download and run the malware, you should still change the password you use for the camstudio forum. The attacker likely has access to the hashed version of this password, and using various techniques may recover the plaintext password. If you use your camstudio forum password with the same or similar email addresses on other sites, it would be a good idea to change your password on those other sites as well. Hope that helps, Jason On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < ter...@gm...> wrote: > Jason, > > Well, Shiver me timbers to their raw bones! Guess I'd better change some > passwords - you do mean it grabs personal passwords from a user's machine, > correct? > > Terry > > *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for > responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * > > *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm... > > wrote: > >> Hi Terry, >> >> I only looked into it long enough to verify it was not CamStudio and >> likely malicious. As best I could tell, it was flagged by all of the AVs >> using generic password grabbing signatures rather than a signature for a >> specific piece of malware. >> >> If I had to speculate, my guess of what happened is that an attacker >> discovered a vulnerability, or developed an exploit for a published >> vulnerability, on an outdated version of the forum software. They then >> performed manual or automated scans of the internet looking for vulnerable >> forums. They found CamStudio. My best guess is they used CVE-2013-3527 >> which enabled them to dump passwords from the forum. Was one of the admin >> passwords for the forum the same as used to access cPanel? Either way, they >> eventually gained access to the server and saw they could distribute >> malware via our download link. They used a generic application that stole >> saved passwords for as many applications as possible and shipped them back >> to the attacker. As best I can tell this password grabber does not have a >> well known name. >> >> Other Possible Forum Vulnerabilities: >> >> http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-11325/product_id-20496/Vanillaforums-Vanilla-Forums.html >> >> Jason >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < >> ter...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Jason, >>> >>> Could you tell which virus it was? >>> >>> Terry >>> >>> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >>> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >>> >>> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend >>> one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman < >>> jas...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download >>>> link on camstudio.org. >>>> >>>> It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. >>>> >>>> I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download was >>>> replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>>> >>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Camstudio-devs mailing list >>>> Cam...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2014-01-15 01:18:03
|
Jason, Well, Shiver me timbers to their raw bones! Guess I'd better change some passwords - you do mean it grabs personal passwords from a user's machine, correct? Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm...>wrote: > Hi Terry, > > I only looked into it long enough to verify it was not CamStudio and > likely malicious. As best I could tell, it was flagged by all of the AVs > using generic password grabbing signatures rather than a signature for a > specific piece of malware. > > If I had to speculate, my guess of what happened is that an attacker > discovered a vulnerability, or developed an exploit for a published > vulnerability, on an outdated version of the forum software. They then > performed manual or automated scans of the internet looking for vulnerable > forums. They found CamStudio. My best guess is they used CVE-2013-3527 > which enabled them to dump passwords from the forum. Was one of the admin > passwords for the forum the same as used to access cPanel? Either way, they > eventually gained access to the server and saw they could distribute > malware via our download link. They used a generic application that stole > saved passwords for as many applications as possible and shipped them back > to the attacker. As best I can tell this password grabber does not have a > well known name. > > Other Possible Forum Vulnerabilities: > > http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-11325/product_id-20496/Vanillaforums-Vanilla-Forums.html > > Jason > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < > ter...@gm...> wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> Could you tell which virus it was? >> >> Terry >> >> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >> >> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend >> one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman < >> jas...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download >>> link on camstudio.org. >>> >>> It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. >>> >>> I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download was >>> replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>> >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Camstudio-devs mailing list >>> Cam...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >>> >>> >> > |
|
From: Jason G. <jas...@gm...> - 2014-01-14 16:56:43
|
Hi Terry, I only looked into it long enough to verify it was not CamStudio and likely malicious. As best I could tell, it was flagged by all of the AVs using generic password grabbing signatures rather than a signature for a specific piece of malware. If I had to speculate, my guess of what happened is that an attacker discovered a vulnerability, or developed an exploit for a published vulnerability, on an outdated version of the forum software. They then performed manual or automated scans of the internet looking for vulnerable forums. They found CamStudio. My best guess is they used CVE-2013-3527 which enabled them to dump passwords from the forum. Was one of the admin passwords for the forum the same as used to access cPanel? Either way, they eventually gained access to the server and saw they could distribute malware via our download link. They used a generic application that stole saved passwords for as many applications as possible and shipped them back to the attacker. As best I can tell this password grabber does not have a well known name. Other Possible Forum Vulnerabilities: http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-11325/product_id-20496/Vanillaforums-Vanilla-Forums.html Jason On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < ter...@gm...> wrote: > Jason, > > Could you tell which virus it was? > > Terry > > *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for > responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * > > *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm... > > wrote: > >> All, >> >> After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download >> link on camstudio.org. >> >> It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. >> >> I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download was >> replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. >> >> Jason >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Camstudio-devs mailing list >> Cam...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >> >> > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2014-01-13 21:55:31
|
Jason, Nick just notified me he's fixed the link and is working on locking down the site even more. Thanks for catching that! Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < ter...@gm...> wrote: > Jason, > > Could you tell which virus it was? > > Terry > > *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for > responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * > > *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm... > > wrote: > >> All, >> >> After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download >> link on camstudio.org. >> >> It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. >> >> I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download was >> replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. >> >> Jason >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Camstudio-devs mailing list >> Cam...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >> >> > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2014-01-13 21:51:02
|
Jason, Could you tell which virus it was? Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm...>wrote: > All, > > After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download > link on camstudio.org. > > It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. > > I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download was > replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. > > Jason > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Camstudio-devs mailing list > Cam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > > |
|
From: Jason G. <jas...@gm...> - 2014-01-13 16:29:57
|
All, After seeing the traffic on sourceforge, I looked at the main download link on camstudio.org. It IS a virus. It IS NOT a false positive from the adware installer. I suspect that camstudio.org was compromised and the real download was replaced with the a trojan. This should be fixed ASAP. Jason |
|
From: Nick S. <in...@in...> - 2013-07-03 21:27:09
|
As far as I know, there is no such document ... at least I haven't seen one in 8 years of [trying to] maintain CamStudio ... On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Jason Goodman <jas...@gm...>wrote: > Hello, > > I'm probably not the best resource, but I'll give you the info I have. I > have also copied the developer mailing list in case they have more > information. > > CamStudio was originally developed as proprietary software by RenderSoft. > I would assume that there was a requirements document generated at that > time, but I do not believe it was ever released when CamStudio was open > sourced (if anybody has seen it, I would be interested in reading it as > well). I do not know of any formal requirements generated or documented > since it was open sourced. The closest thing would be a few threads on > camstudio.org about what users want to see in the next version. > > Jason > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Daud <dau...@us...> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I am a Masters in Software Engineering research student and my research >> is on the requirements problems in the Open Source Software environment. >> For my research purpose I need to talk to the core members of the team. >> Kindly respond me at the earliest, I am really interested in gathering the >> information regarding your project on SourceForge.net mainly because it >> will be mentioned then in my Journal research paper. >> >> Kindly, email me at: >> kan...@gm... >> >> I'll be waiting for your response core team members! >> ------------------------------ >> >> Software Requirements<https://sourceforge.net/p/camstudio/discussion/447910/thread/69719cbe/?limit=25#1f5b> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in >> https://sourceforge.net/p/camstudio/discussion/447910/ >> >> To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit >> https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/ >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Camstudio-devs mailing list > Cam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > > |
|
From: Jason G. <jas...@gm...> - 2013-07-03 20:47:19
|
Hello, I'm probably not the best resource, but I'll give you the info I have. I have also copied the developer mailing list in case they have more information. CamStudio was originally developed as proprietary software by RenderSoft. I would assume that there was a requirements document generated at that time, but I do not believe it was ever released when CamStudio was open sourced (if anybody has seen it, I would be interested in reading it as well). I do not know of any formal requirements generated or documented since it was open sourced. The closest thing would be a few threads on camstudio.orgabout what users want to see in the next version. Jason On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Daud <dau...@us...> wrote: > Hello! > > I am a Masters in Software Engineering research student and my research is > on the requirements problems in the Open Source Software environment. For > my research purpose I need to talk to the core members of the team. Kindly > respond me at the earliest, I am really interested in gathering the > information regarding your project on SourceForge.net mainly because it > will be mentioned then in my Journal research paper. > > Kindly, email me at: > kan...@gm... > > I'll be waiting for your response core team members! > ------------------------------ > > Software Requirements<https://sourceforge.net/p/camstudio/discussion/447910/thread/69719cbe/?limit=25#1f5b> > ------------------------------ > > Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in > https://sourceforge.net/p/camstudio/discussion/447910/ > > To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit > https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/ > |
|
From: Nick S. <in...@in...> - 2013-07-01 18:09:20
|
Hi Jason Nice to hear from you again ... To answer your points as best as I can ... Why is there a copy of the entire source tree under CamStudio2.7? *I made a decision to start a completely new tree due to the number of changes/fixes that were being added and didn't want to pollute the main tree.* * * *As I'm not a programmer this was probably an error, but figured better to add unproven code to a different tree ...* Who is Bertoso and why is his home directory referenced for info-icon.bmp ( in CamStudio2.7\Recorder\Recorder.rc)? If this is you please add info-icon.bmp to the source and fix the link. *Bertoso is Alberto, a guy I've been paying for fixing bugs etc. to CamStudio for about 8 months. Don't know about the info-icon.bmp issue but will pass it along ...* Why do we have a bunch of object and executable files checked into hg? Any good reason I shouldn't delete them since they are generated by the build process? Any reason not to add of the output files to the .hgignore file? Any good reason not to add all of the standard VS generated files to .hgignore? I ended up giving up on building the 2.7 directory after fixing the above issues because it was failing to find includes. What build environment did this correctly build under? The CamStudio directory built fine for me (VS2010 on Win7 x64). Comparing these folders didn't immediately make it clear to me what the difference was. If I develop from CamStudio instead of CamStudio2.7 am I introducing regressions? *Don't know about all of this (probably yes to regressions), so I think maybe I should put you two together to talk "tech" and figure out what your compiling issues are as he *is* able to compile ...* * * Cheers Nick :o) On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Jason <ble...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks Terry for the very good bug report. I was going to take shot at > fixing it, but the current state of the code caused me to gave up. > > Maybe somebody can help me figure out what has changed so much since a > couple years ago when I last built and contributed CamStudio. I also don't > want to just go in and start committing changes that I think are fixing > things when somebody else did it for a good reason I just don't understand. > > Why is there a copy of the entire source tree under CamStudio2.7? > > Who is Bertoso and why is his home directory referenced for info-icon.bmp > ( in CamStudio2.7\Recorder\Recorder.rc)? If this is you please add > info-icon.bmp to the source and fix the link. > > Why do we have a bunch of object and executable files checked into hg? Any > good reason I shouldn't delete them since they are generated by the build > process? > > Any reason not to add of the output files to the .hgignore file? Any good > reason not to add all of the standard VS generated files to .hgignore? > > I ended up giving up on building the 2.7 directory after fixing the above > issues because it was failing to find includes. What build environment did > this correctly build under? > > The CamStudio directory built fine for me (VS2010 on Win7 x64). Comparing > these folders didn't immediately make it clear to me what the difference > was. If I develop from CamStudio instead of CamStudio2.7 am I introducing > regressions? > > I do have some time to contribute and would like to do so. It just seems > daunting when I come back to things and have some much trouble even > building and running the program. > > Sorry for the verbose email, but hopefully it will start generating some > traffic on this mailing list so we can all have a better idea what is going > on. > > Thanks in advance for anybody that can help answer any of my questions. > > Jason > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < > ter...@gm...> wrote: > >> This from >> http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1260/cursor-enable-visual-click-feedback-no-function#Item_5 >> >> The first configuration (after re-install or deleting CamStudio.cfg) of >> Highlight Cursor works as expected. >> >> Any further click of the OK button in the Configure Cursor screen will >> corrupt the saved data, as if the data was read and written to the file as >> a different numeric type. >> >> With my programmer experience, it looks like a ulong vs long problem, as >> the values seem to experience a bit-shift. >> >> The reason the highlight becomes so faint is that the alpha component of >> the color is also divide by 2 at each save. >> >> My config: Camstudio 2.7 (r316) on Vista 32-bit. >> >> Terry >> >> *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >> responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * >> >> *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend >> one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: >> >> Build for Windows Store. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Camstudio-devs mailing list >> Cam...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Camstudio-devs mailing list > Cam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2013-06-23 05:56:25
|
This came in through the forum application emails: Howdy, I was reading through all you wrote on your site and your need for C++ developers, etc + ask for donations. Might I suggest adding a for pay component to this software ? Perhaps the ability to auto post the casts to online spaces for a small fee ? $5 Just an idea. ---------------------------------- Jason Korth 919.249.5172 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 919.249.5172 FREE end_of_the_skype_highlighting http://EpicForce.net <http://epicforce.net/> Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” * -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2013-06-18 20:11:44
|
Here is an interesting question from the forum: http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1277/network-deployment-of-camstudio - poolkingsean <http://camstudio.org/forum/profile/28519/poolkingsean> 3:31AM Permalink<http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1277/network-deployment-of-camstudio/p1> Edit <http://camstudio.org/forum/vanilla/post/editdiscussion/1277> Announce<http://camstudio.org/forum/vanilla/discussion/announce/1277/AEAZCGTHCHQX> Sink<http://camstudio.org/forum/vanilla/discussion/sink/1277/AEAZCGTHCHQX?Target=discussion%2F1277%2Fnetwork-deployment-of-camstudio> Close<http://camstudio.org/forum/vanilla/discussion/close/1277/AEAZCGTHCHQX?Target=discussion%2F1277%2Fnetwork-deployment-of-camstudio>Delete Discussion<http://camstudio.org/forum/vanilla/discussion/delete/1277/AEAZCGTHCHQX> Flag<http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/flag/discussion/1277/28519/poolkingsean/L2Rpc2N1c3Npb24vMTI3Ny9uZXR3b3JrLWRlcGxveW1lbnQtb2YtY2Ftc3R1ZGlv> Has anyone had any success in rolling out CamStudio to about 200 client PCs. I've tried several times to make an msi package of the software, I've used Cameyo to package CamStudio, and I'm having problems with everything single method. When CamStudio is installed in the default location of program files, when the users try to record a video, it won't record, as they don't have read/write access to the temporary video folder in program files. I then noticed a recording options within CamStudio to point the save location to another location. I have been unsuccessful at integrating this into a package, and if I alter this recording option on my admin account, when a normal user account logs in, the setting is back to default. I thought I had success with using Cameyo to package CamStudio as a virtual application, but then discovered a file move error when trying to save a recording, when I set the Region of Recording to 'Window', which I believe if I change the option from allow users to choose what the file name is called, to just save it automatically as date/time etcetera this would probably get around the problem, but when I try to repackage CamStudio as a virtual application, it never saves this change. Just wondering if anyones successfully deployed it to a lot of computers and wondering how you did it. I'm working in a school environment, a mix of Windows 7 32bit and 64bit computers. Thanks, Sean Anyone think this is possible? Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” * -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* |
|
From: Jason <ble...@gm...> - 2013-06-18 05:41:33
|
Thanks Terry for the very good bug report. I was going to take shot at fixing it, but the current state of the code caused me to gave up. Maybe somebody can help me figure out what has changed so much since a couple years ago when I last built and contributed CamStudio. I also don't want to just go in and start committing changes that I think are fixing things when somebody else did it for a good reason I just don't understand. Why is there a copy of the entire source tree under CamStudio2.7? Who is Bertoso and why is his home directory referenced for info-icon.bmp ( in CamStudio2.7\Recorder\Recorder.rc)? If this is you please add info-icon.bmp to the source and fix the link. Why do we have a bunch of object and executable files checked into hg? Any good reason I shouldn't delete them since they are generated by the build process? Any reason not to add of the output files to the .hgignore file? Any good reason not to add all of the standard VS generated files to .hgignore? I ended up giving up on building the 2.7 directory after fixing the above issues because it was failing to find includes. What build environment did this correctly build under? The CamStudio directory built fine for me (VS2010 on Win7 x64). Comparing these folders didn't immediately make it clear to me what the difference was. If I develop from CamStudio instead of CamStudio2.7 am I introducing regressions? I do have some time to contribute and would like to do so. It just seems daunting when I come back to things and have some much trouble even building and running the program. Sorry for the verbose email, but hopefully it will start generating some traffic on this mailing list so we can all have a better idea what is going on. Thanks in advance for anybody that can help answer any of my questions. Jason On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Terry Leigh Britton < ter...@gm...> wrote: > This from > http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1260/cursor-enable-visual-click-feedback-no-function#Item_5 > > The first configuration (after re-install or deleting CamStudio.cfg) of > Highlight Cursor works as expected. > > Any further click of the OK button in the Configure Cursor screen will > corrupt the saved data, as if the data was read and written to the file as > a different numeric type. > > With my programmer experience, it looks like a ulong vs long problem, as > the values seem to experience a bit-shift. > > The reason the highlight becomes so faint is that the alpha component of > the color is also divide by 2 at each save. > > My config: Camstudio 2.7 (r316) on Vista 32-bit. > > Terry > > *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for > responsibility.”* -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * > > *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Camstudio-devs mailing list > Cam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2013-06-18 02:55:20
|
This from http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1260/cursor-enable-visual-click-feedback-no-function#Item_5 The first configuration (after re-install or deleting CamStudio.cfg) of Highlight Cursor works as expected. Any further click of the OK button in the Configure Cursor screen will corrupt the saved data, as if the data was read and written to the file as a different numeric type. With my programmer experience, it looks like a ulong vs long problem, as the values seem to experience a bit-shift. The reason the highlight becomes so faint is that the alpha component of the color is also divide by 2 at each save. My config: Camstudio 2.7 (r316) on Vista 32-bit. Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” * -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* |
|
From: Nick S. <su...@ca...> - 2013-01-25 09:30:18
|
Hey Terry I agree that key frames only really seems to be about scrubbing and searching through the video and I think you're right about graininess ... I think it's more related to being an optimal setting for filesize and bitrate (in that you have to increase it to compensate for the key frames) to make sure you get the sharpness there after recording is finished. Anyway, what the hell do I know? LOL! Cheers Nick :o) On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Terry Leigh Britton <ter...@gm...> wrote: > Nick, > > Heck, I get good results at 200! From what I understand about the keyframe, > it primarily affects the "search" refinement, when a person clicks the > progress bar at the bottom of the player, and it jumps to a spot. It can > only jump to full keyframes (which is a full capture of the entire region. > In-between frames are only recordings of the pixels that changed. In > full-motion recordings, of course, that is most of the pixels, but in > tutorials, it is only the mouse movement, for instance.) > > I do not know enough to understand why those codecs use what they use - > probably for the search "graininess" or refinement. > > > Terry > > "Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” > - Dietrich Bonhoeffer > > "Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." - Terry Leigh Britton > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Nick Smith <su...@ca...> wrote: >> >> Terry, I've posted a reply on the forum but also came across something >> else ... >> >> After a little further research it seems as though the keyframe rate >> of 300 is related to 10 seconds of video @ 30fps ... >> >> But what if the playback rate is 20 fps or 25 fps? Should it be kept >> at 300 or dropped down to 200 or 250? >> >> And what effect will this increased keyframe rate have on the video >> bitrate setting in x264 and Xvid? >> >> Do we increase it slightly to compensate or keep it as it is with the >> (Xvid) HD 720 profile, target quantizer @ 1 >> >> You've always had good results at 100, so this is interesting ... >> >> I'll keep digging ... >> >> Cheers >> >> Nick :o) >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Terry Leigh Britton >> <ter...@gm...> wrote: >> > This is an interesting question from Ken at the forums (bmoreken) >> > >> > Perhaps it’s easily missed in this very long exchange, but it might be >> > noted >> > that both of us are using a key frames setting of 200. In my analysis of >> > both x264 and MPEG-4 finished videos, I’ve come to the conclusion that >> > anything else interferes with the codec’s ability to properly set key >> > frames, and in fact, I’m wondering if 200 isn’t just the least of all >> > possible evils. Normally key frame intervals for MPEG-4 is between 300 >> > and >> > 700, so we need to be asking why Cam is operating entirely out of that >> > range. Note that Cam will NOT run with key frames set at 0, so the >> > program >> > is definitely trying to impose some sort of key frame limitation. I’m >> > wondering if the new version will address this issue. >> > >> > From here: >> > >> > http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1137/german-einstellungen-fuer-hohe-qualitaet-und-kleine-dateigroessen#Item_14 >> > >> > Terry >> > >> > "Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for >> > responsibility.” >> > - Dietrich Bonhoeffer >> > >> > "Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend >> > one's lifetime." - Terry Leigh Britton >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, >> > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current >> > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft >> > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Camstudio-devs mailing list >> > Cam...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs >> > > > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2013-01-25 04:21:21
|
Nick, Heck, I get good results at 200! From what I understand about the keyframe, it primarily affects the "search" refinement, when a person clicks the progress bar at the bottom of the player, and it jumps to a spot. It can only jump to full keyframes (which is a full capture of the entire region. In-between frames are only recordings of the pixels that changed. In full-motion recordings, of course, that is most of the pixels, but in tutorials, it is only the mouse movement, for instance.) I do not know enough to understand why those codecs use what they use - probably for the search "graininess" or refinement. Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” * -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Nick Smith <su...@ca...> wrote: > Terry, I've posted a reply on the forum but also came across something > else ... > > After a little further research it seems as though the keyframe rate > of 300 is related to 10 seconds of video @ 30fps ... > > But what if the playback rate is 20 fps or 25 fps? Should it be kept > at 300 or dropped down to 200 or 250? > > And what effect will this increased keyframe rate have on the video > bitrate setting in x264 and Xvid? > > Do we increase it slightly to compensate or keep it as it is with the > (Xvid) HD 720 profile, target quantizer @ 1 > > You've always had good results at 100, so this is interesting ... > > I'll keep digging ... > > Cheers > > Nick :o) > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Terry Leigh Britton > <ter...@gm...> wrote: > > This is an interesting question from Ken at the forums (bmoreken) > > > > Perhaps it’s easily missed in this very long exchange, but it might be > noted > > that both of us are using a key frames setting of 200. In my analysis of > > both x264 and MPEG-4 finished videos, I’ve come to the conclusion that > > anything else interferes with the codec’s ability to properly set key > > frames, and in fact, I’m wondering if 200 isn’t just the least of all > > possible evils. Normally key frame intervals for MPEG-4 is between 300 > and > > 700, so we need to be asking why Cam is operating entirely out of that > > range. Note that Cam will NOT run with key frames set at 0, so the > program > > is definitely trying to impose some sort of key frame limitation. I’m > > wondering if the new version will address this issue. > > > > From here: > > > http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1137/german-einstellungen-fuer-hohe-qualitaet-und-kleine-dateigroessen#Item_14 > > > > Terry > > > > "Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for > responsibility.” > > - Dietrich Bonhoeffer > > > > "Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > > one's lifetime." - Terry Leigh Britton > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > > _______________________________________________ > > Camstudio-devs mailing list > > Cam...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > > > |
|
From: Nick S. <su...@ca...> - 2013-01-25 00:35:13
|
Terry, I've posted a reply on the forum but also came across something else ... After a little further research it seems as though the keyframe rate of 300 is related to 10 seconds of video @ 30fps ... But what if the playback rate is 20 fps or 25 fps? Should it be kept at 300 or dropped down to 200 or 250? And what effect will this increased keyframe rate have on the video bitrate setting in x264 and Xvid? Do we increase it slightly to compensate or keep it as it is with the (Xvid) HD 720 profile, target quantizer @ 1 You've always had good results at 100, so this is interesting ... I'll keep digging ... Cheers Nick :o) On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Terry Leigh Britton <ter...@gm...> wrote: > This is an interesting question from Ken at the forums (bmoreken) > > Perhaps it’s easily missed in this very long exchange, but it might be noted > that both of us are using a key frames setting of 200. In my analysis of > both x264 and MPEG-4 finished videos, I’ve come to the conclusion that > anything else interferes with the codec’s ability to properly set key > frames, and in fact, I’m wondering if 200 isn’t just the least of all > possible evils. Normally key frame intervals for MPEG-4 is between 300 and > 700, so we need to be asking why Cam is operating entirely out of that > range. Note that Cam will NOT run with key frames set at 0, so the program > is definitely trying to impose some sort of key frame limitation. I’m > wondering if the new version will address this issue. > > From here: > http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1137/german-einstellungen-fuer-hohe-qualitaet-und-kleine-dateigroessen#Item_14 > > Terry > > "Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” > - Dietrich Bonhoeffer > > "Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend > one's lifetime." - Terry Leigh Britton > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Camstudio-devs mailing list > Cam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs > |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2013-01-24 21:19:11
|
This is an interesting question from Ken at the forums (bmoreken) Perhaps it’s easily missed in this very long exchange, but it might be noted that both of us are using a key frames setting of 200. In my analysis of both x264 and MPEG-4 finished videos, I’ve come to the conclusion that anything else interferes with the codec’s ability to properly set key frames, and in fact, I’m wondering if 200 isn’t just the least of all possible evils. Normally key frame intervals for MPEG-4 is between 300 and 700, so we need to be asking why Cam is operating entirely out of that range. Note that Cam will NOT run with key frames set at 0, so the program is definitely trying to impose some sort of key frame limitation. I’m wondering if the new version will address this issue. >From here: http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1137/german-einstellungen-fuer-hohe-qualitaet-und-kleine-dateigroessen#Item_14 Terry *"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” * -* Dietrich Bonhoeffer * *"Helping others in whatever way one can is a most pleasant way to spend one's lifetime." *- *Terry Leigh Britton* |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2012-12-10 19:36:57
|
Reference this thread. I have no idea why this would be happening. http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1154/i-can-not-change-the-background-color-of-the-shapes-screen-annotation Terry |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2012-11-27 14:17:19
|
http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1140/file-format I don't know what could be going on here. Please take a look for me! Terry |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2012-10-10 01:36:52
|
Nick, Jan and everyone else, Read the following, from this thread<http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/570/camstudio-crashes-as-soon-as-i-start>. It seems very strange. Terry - VaHam <http://camstudio.org/forum/profile/11270/VaHam> 8:50AM <http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/comment/4654#Comment_4654> Has anyone found a fix for this problem? I have exactly the same problem with XP SP3 Faulting application recorder.exe version 2.6.0.0 faulting module avifil32.dll, version 5.1.2600.5908, fault address 0x000029b0. From Video Codecs Properties: CamCodec.dll Cinepak Codec by Radius Inc. DivX 6.9.2 Codec Indeo codec by Intel Intel Video R3.2 ver 3.24.15.03 Indeo video 5.10 Intel video 5.10 id41_32.ax Intel video 4.4 iyuv_32.dll Intel Video iYUV R2.0 ver 2.00.00.00 lvcodec2.dll Logitech Video Codec ver 13.31.1044.0 Microsoft RLE Codec Microsoft Video 1 msh261.drv Microsoft H.261 ver 5.1.2600.5512 msh263.dvr Microsoft H.263 ver 5.1.2600.5512 msyuv.dll Microsoft UYVY Video Decompressor ver 5.3.2600.5908 TechSmith Screen Capture Codec tsbyuv.dll I have tried uninstalling and reinstalling 2.6 b294 as well as reverting to 2.0 which says it cannot create file but logs no system error. Tried all three recording location methods and just have no joy. I also uninstalled and reinstalled C++ redistributables both 2008 and 2010. I love camstudio and want to make it work again!!!! |
|
From: Terry L. B. <tbr...@gm...> - 2012-07-24 17:13:52
|
This is interesting! Terry **---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Support <no...@ca...> Date: Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:55 AM Subject: [CamStudio Support Forum] kevenwebb sent you a message. To: TerryBritton <tbr...@gm...> kevenwebb sent you a message. I had a need to only insall the SmartCam CODECs installed on a machine (support rep) that would receive the captured video from SmartCam, and I built an installer kit (Inno Setup) for that purpose. It works on both Win32 and Win64 platforms. I'd like to contribute my work to the project for others to use, but I'm not sure how to make that offer. I am willing to maintain the installation kit when new versions of the CODEC are released. If you're using InnoSetup for the primary kit (or would like to), I could also lend a hand in maintaining that. I uploaded the installation exe here: http://webbsoftware.com/download/CamStudio-Codecs-1.5.exe The Inno Setup source is here: http://webbsoftware.com/download/CamStudio-Codecs-1.5.zip If you want to discuss this further, please let me know. Keven --- Follow the link below to check it out: http://camstudio.org/forum/messages/82#2733 Have a great day! |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2011-09-29 03:56:44
|
There is a txt file being left in directory with final AVI file is confusing VLC into thinking it is a caption file. Is there a way to turn-off the txt file creation? http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/820/textfile-being-mistaken-for-captions Thanks! Terry |
|
From: Terry L. B. <ter...@gm...> - 2011-09-12 22:07:37
|
http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/816/bugs-enable-audio-results-in-no-video This odd audio problem has appeared twice recently -- if recording audio, no video appears. Any ideas? Terry |
