OK.
I shall send you invitation to join
Kind regards, Met vriendelijke groet,
Jan Hoogma
Jahoma Development B.V.
Robot visie, bewegingsdetectie en tijdregistratie oplossingen.
www.jahoma.nl/timereg
++31 (0)6 53.23.07.48
Skype: JanHgm
Enkele dynamische ET specialisten...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Leigh Britton" <ter...@gm...>
To: cam...@li...
Sent: Thursday, 26 May, 2011 2:51:00 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [Camstudio-devs] Camstudio 3.1a.1 - Alpha Release
Everyone,
Yes, a drop box would be the way to go. I do not have the facilities here to compile.
Terry
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Nick Smith < su...@ca... > wrote:
Yes, I agree we should keep versions at 2.x for this codebase ...
3.x version should be a complete rewrite from scratch as far as I'm
concerned ...
I'm also not able to compile alpha/beta versions, so a centralized
DropBox area would be awesome.
Also, we seem to be CCing people and emailing the dev list on
SourceForge - there's a lot of duplicate comms going on.
There was also a devlist hosted on CamStudio.org that was used for a while ...
So, can we make sure all dev comms are sent only via
" cam...@li... " - I will notify any devs on the
CamStudio hosted list to resign up to the SF one
I think everyone here is on the list, but just in case you're not,
email me and I'll dig out the sign up link ...
There was also a short-lived "beta testers" list with a couple of
people on it ... I'll also contact them to see if they want to sign up
to the SF dev list ...
As such, please be aware that the SF list is publicly readable, so
don't include anything you wouldn't want to be seen by anyone ...
Cheers
Nick :o)
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Jan Hoogma < ja...@ja... > wrote:
> @Terry,
>
> Just a question?
> As our tester are you able to compile the executable yourself?
> In the past I put copies on my own environment for you and others.
> Not the best approach now.
>
> Maybe we should create a dropbox for you (and other non developers) so we
> can share pre-beta releases easily in between.
> As I learned from earlier release, it is better that one of us finds out
> that new development got bugs than that other common users do and we get
> ongoing comments in the forum about that.
>
> @Paul
> Do you agree?
> I assume that you have release experience with software in an open
> community.
> BTW. Can we use our new SCM tool Mercurial for that?
>
> Jan
>
>
> ++31 (0)6 53.23.07.48
> Skype: JanHgm
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terry Leigh Britton" < ter...@gm... >
> To: "Jan Hoogma" < ja...@ja... >
> Cc: "Nick Smith" < su...@ca... >,
> cam...@li... , "Antonis Loizou"
> < ant...@ho... >
> Sent: Thursday, 26 May, 2011 2:57:22 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern
> / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
> Subject: Re: [Camstudio-devs] Camstudio 3.1a.1 - Alpha Release
>
> This is hilarious! (But so true.) :-0
> Terry
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Jan Hoogma < ja...@ja... > wrote:
>>
>> Best approach I believe is that we never tag a release with a 3.0 tag
>> again. Just skip 3.0
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________ Camstudio-devs mailing list Cam...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/camstudio-devs |