|
From: Dan P. <ba...@al...> - 2004-03-15 07:31:32
|
On Mar 15, Jim Ursetto wrote: > I apologize if this stuff is obvious, esoteric, and/or offtopic. :) I find it really interesting anyway. :) It's good to know (well, in a "better know now than later" sort of way) that GCC isn't as good as I had thought it was originally. I wonder too how much of these missed optimizations are due to SH4 vs other arches. It seems like some of them have got to be the responsibility of a higher-up piece of code. |