bwm-tools-tech Mailing List for Bandwidth Management Tools (Page 7)
Brought to you by:
nkukard
Menu
▾
▴
bwm-tools-tech — General & Technical Discussion
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(6) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: confruo de M. <co...@ho...> - 2006-05-04 10:37:28
|
Hi there,
>Could you try configure like this ... CFLAGS="-g" ./configure
>....................
>
>Remember to start out with a clean source dir.
>
>After the make, do an instll and run with gdb as you did below.... we
>should then get line numbers in source where the segfault is occuring.
The CFLAGS="-g" ./configure gives a different size binary for bwm_tools, but
the output in gdb is the same, so since i read the shannan summers thread, I
also did a -bt- , next is the output;
(gdb) r -f
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/bwm_firewall -f
Reading symbols from shared object read from target memory...done.
Loaded system supplied DSO at 0x407000
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208497872 (LWP 2262)]
BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design
Loading configuration from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1208497872 (LWP 2262)]
0x00138e0e in g_list_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00138e0e in g_list_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#1 0x00a66ae2 in createClassRuleset (confClass=0x84bdec0) at xmlConf.c:329
#2 0x00a696e1 in parseGlobal (doc=0x84c6a90, cur=0x84c7220) at
xmlConf.c:1567
#3 0x080491d1 in createFirewallRules (filename=0x804a1e0
"/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", resetCounters=0 '\0')
at bwm_firewall.c:200
#4 0x08049be3 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfb8e314) at bwm_firewall.c:413
! but again, whatever ./configure I do, this remains the same, so i wonder
if I do this right.
Thanks in advance
_________________________________________________________________
Typ je SMS sneller binnen MSN Messenger
http://www1.imagine-msn.com/Messenger/Expressions.aspx
|
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-04 06:03:49
|
Hi, > gdb output: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation Fault. > [Switching to Thread -1208867136 (LWP 25655)] > 0x00121a90 in g_list_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Could you type bt after you get the above and send me the entire output plz. -Nigel |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-04 05:32:22
|
Hi there, > > Interesting.... so its a updated FC4 installation? > > Hmm, ok :) > > Could you build BWM Tools with debugging support and run it > through gdb for me and send me the output. > > I think i might need some help here, what i did was ./configure > --with-debug , i guess ? Could you try configure like this ... CFLAGS="-g" ./configure .................... Remember to start out with a clean source dir. After the make, do an instll and run with gdb as you did below.... we should then get line numbers in source where the segfault is occuring. Regards Nigel > > then run gdb bwm_firewall, and then run -f within gdb > > This gives me something like; > gdb /usr/local/bin/bwm_firewall > ... bla bla bla ... > (gdb) r -f > Starting program: /usr/local/bin/bwm_firewall -f > Reading symbols from shared object read from target memory...done. > Loaded system supplied DSO at 0x2e9000 > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread -1208022816 (LWP 4399)] > BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design > > Loading configuration from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"... > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread -1208022816 (LWP 4399)] > 0x005a3a90 in g_list_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > (gdb) > > Hope this helps, for this doesn't mean anything to me :P |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-04 05:19:54
|
Hi John,
1. Which version of RRDTool are you building against?
2. What configure options are you using?
Regards
Nigel
John Bii wrote:
>Hello
>
>I am trying to install BWM Tools on SUSE linux 10
>
>The problem is it does not install all the BWM tools Utilities. It only
>
>install bwm_firewall. It does not install bwmd, bwm_monitor and bwm_graph
>
>The problem starts with MAKE command which produces the output below. Whatis
>
>the problem and how do I go about it? HELP
>
>
>
>Regards
>
>John Bii
>
>Moi University
>
>
>
>LRClinux:~/bwm_tools-200603080716 # make
>
>make all-recursive
>
>make[1]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>Making all in lib
>
>make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/lib'
>
>make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>
>make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/lib'
>
>Making all in bwm_firewall
>
>make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_firewall'
>
>make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>
>make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_firewall'
>
>Making all in bwm_graph
>
>make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph'
>
>make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -pthread
>
>-I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome/lib/glib-2.0/include
>
>-DLOG_DIR=\"/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0 -g -O2 -MT bwm_graph-graph.o -MD
>
>-MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c'
>
>|| echo './'`graph.c; \
>
>then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; else rm -f
>
>".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
>
>graph.c: In function ‘writeGraphs’:
>
>graph.c:637: error: too few arguments to function ‘rrd_graph’
>
>make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1
>
>make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph'
>
>make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>
>make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
>make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>LRClinux:~/bwm_tools-200603080716 #
>
>
>
>
--
Nigel Kukard, PhD CompSc
Linux Based Systems Design
The best language to use is the language that was designed for
what you want to use it for.
|
|
From: John B. <jo...@mu...> - 2006-05-03 12:39:27
|
Hello I am trying to install BWM Tools on SUSE linux 10 The problem is it does not install all the BWM tools Utilities. It only install bwm_firewall. It does not install bwmd, bwm_monitor and bwm_graph The problem starts with MAKE command which produces the output below. Whatis the problem and how do I go about it? HELP Regards John Bii Moi University LRClinux:~/bwm_tools-200603080716 # make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' Making all in lib make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/lib' make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/lib' Making all in bwm_firewall make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_firewall' make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_firewall' Making all in bwm_graph make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph' make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -pthread -I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome/lib/glib-2.0/include -DLOG_DIR=\"/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0 -g -O2 -MT bwm_graph-graph.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c' || echo './'`graph.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi graph.c: In function ‘writeGraphs’: graph.c:637: error: too few arguments to function ‘rrd_graph’ make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' make: *** [all] Error 2 LRClinux:~/bwm_tools-200603080716 # -- John Bii School of Medicine Moi University |
|
From: confruo de M. <co...@ho...> - 2006-05-01 07:29:26
|
Interesting.... so its a updated FC4 installation? Hmm, ok :) Could you build BWM Tools with debugging support and run it through gdb for me and send me the output. I think i might need some help here, what i did was ./configure --with-debug , i guess ? then run gdb bwm_firewall, and then run -f within gdb This gives me something like; gdb /usr/local/bin/bwm_firewall ... bla bla bla ... (gdb) r -f Starting program: /usr/local/bin/bwm_firewall -f Reading symbols from shared object read from target memory...done. Loaded system supplied DSO at 0x2e9000 [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208022816 (LWP 4399)] BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design Loading configuration from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1208022816 (LWP 4399)] 0x005a3a90 in g_list_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (gdb) Hope this helps, for this doesn't mean anything to me :P _________________________________________________________________ Nieuw op MSN Messenger 7.5: Dynamische achtergronden http://www1.imagine-msn.com/Messenger/Audio.aspx |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-04-27 19:45:15
|
Good day,
> Now that I updated (fresh install) my machine from Fedora Core 4 to
> Core 5, I get segmentation faults after updating my kernel (standard
> yum update). I allready updated 2 kernel versions, but only with the
> stock 2.6.15-1.2054 bwm_tools works.
Interesting.... so its a updated FC4 installation?
>
> bwm_firewall -f
> BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design
>
> Loading configuration from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"...
> Segmentation fault
Ok ... bwm_firewall isn't that nasty, shouldn't be too hard to track
the bug and mash it with a sledge hammer.
> The last part when running strace;
>
> mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0) = 0xb7fa1000
> write(1, "BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright "..., 74BWM Firewall v0.2.3
> - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design
>
> ) = 74
> write(1, "Loading configuration from \"/etc"..., 60Loading
> configuration from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"...
> ) = 60
> futex(0x4838b8, FUTEX_WAKE, 2147483647) = 0
> stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644,
> st_size=19773, ...}) = 0
> brk(0) = 0x94a9000
> brk(0x94ca000) = 0x94ca000
> stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644,
> st_size=19773, ...}) = 0
> stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644,
> st_size=19773, ...}) = 0
> stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644,
> st_size=19773, ...}) = 0
> open("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=19773, ...}) = 0
> mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0) = 0xb7fa0000
> read(3, "<firewall>\n#\n# Global configurat"..., 16384) = 16384
> _llseek(3, 0, [16384], SEEK_CUR) = 0
> _llseek(3, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0
> read(3, "<firewall>\n#\n# Global configurat"..., 4096) = 4096
> read(3, " </class>\n\t\t<class"..., 4096) = 4096
> read(3, "0\" dst-iface=\"eth0\"/>\n "..., 4096) = 4096
> read(3, " <rul"..., 4096) = 4096
> read(3, " <rule target=\"a"..., 4096) = 3389
> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
> close(3) = 0
> munmap(0xb7fa0000, 4096) = 0
> gettimeofday({1146142654, 659695}, NULL) = 0
> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
> Process 16358 detached
Could you build BWM Tools with debugging support and run it through gdb
for me and send me the output.
> And this happens now with kernel 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5smp, the strace
> output doesn't mean anything to me, perhaps someone likes to see the
> complete output. Anyway, I never had a problem that I know of with
> Fedora core 4, and the bwmd and bwm_graph run without problems.
> re-installing doesn't solve it as well.
I think its some incompatibility, the gdb output above should show the
line number causing the segfault.
-Nigel
|
|
From: confruo de M. <co...@ho...> - 2006-04-27 13:23:39
|
Hi list,
Now that I updated (fresh install) my machine from Fedora Core 4 to Core 5,
I get segmentation faults after updating my kernel (standard yum update). I
allready updated 2 kernel versions, but only with the stock 2.6.15-1.2054
bwm_tools works.
bwm_firewall -f
BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design
Loading configuration from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"...
Segmentation fault
The last part when running strace;
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fa1000
write(1, "BWM Firewall v0.2.3 - Copyright "..., 74BWM Firewall v0.2.3 -
Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design
) = 74
write(1, "Loading configuration from \"/etc"..., 60Loading configuration
from "/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml"...
) = 60
futex(0x4838b8, FUTEX_WAKE, 2147483647) = 0
stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=19773,
...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x94a9000
brk(0x94ca000) = 0x94ca000
stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=19773,
...}) = 0
stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=19773,
...}) = 0
stat64("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=19773,
...}) = 0
open("/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=19773, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fa0000
read(3, "<firewall>\n#\n# Global configurat"..., 16384) = 16384
_llseek(3, 0, [16384], SEEK_CUR) = 0
_llseek(3, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0
read(3, "<firewall>\n#\n# Global configurat"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, " </class>\n\t\t<class"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "0\" dst-iface=\"eth0\"/>\n "..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, " <rul"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, " <rule target=\"a"..., 4096) = 3389
read(3, "", 4096) = 0
read(3, "", 4096) = 0
close(3) = 0
munmap(0xb7fa0000, 4096) = 0
gettimeofday({1146142654, 659695}, NULL) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Process 16358 detached
And this happens now with kernel 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5smp, the strace output
doesn't mean anything to me, perhaps someone likes to see the complete
output. Anyway, I never had a problem that I know of with Fedora core 4,
and the bwmd and bwm_graph run without problems. re-installing doesn't
solve it as well.
_________________________________________________________________
Nieuw op MSN Messenger 7.5: Dynamische achtergronden
http://www1.imagine-msn.com/Messenger/Audio.aspx
|
|
From: Kobe L. <ko...@le...> - 2006-04-05 12:57:39
|
As far as I know, it's only possible to have one QUEUE "deamon", unless you can get the both programs talking to eachother you're out of luck. But there is word of a NFQUEUE target in 2.6.14 on http://kerneltrap.org/node/5524/print If you have the courage, try it. it probably requires changes to bmwd too= . Greetz Kobe > Hi, > > I have been trying out the bwm_tools for some time now using the acl as > well > as the traffic part, and was wondering if it is possible to also use > inline-snort together with bwm_tools, for they both use the QUEUE targe= t. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stuur een voiceclip met MSN Messenger 7.5 > http://www1.imagine-msn.com/Messenger/Video.aspx > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > |
|
From: confruo de M. <co...@ho...> - 2006-04-05 12:37:35
|
Hi, I have been trying out the bwm_tools for some time now using the acl as well as the traffic part, and was wondering if it is possible to also use inline-snort together with bwm_tools, for they both use the QUEUE target. _________________________________________________________________ Stuur een voiceclip met MSN Messenger 7.5 http://www1.imagine-msn.com/Messenger/Video.aspx |
|
From: Kobe L. <ko...@le...> - 2006-03-28 07:38:36
|
As was said before here Anything you can mark, you can shape ;-) Greetz Kobe > Hi Shannon, > >> >> Could i run this on a linux server that is bridged? > > Yep. > >> i want to drop a box on the inside of our firewall between the network >> and the firewall to monitor/shape/report on all our internal subnets. >> >> Like would I be able to shape 192.168.50 addresses to 7M/s and >> 192.168.1 addresses to 10M/s and use the rest to allocate to our web >> server to use. Then be able to get monthly reports on how much each >> has used? All this on a transparent bridge? > > For the briding, just setup a normal Linux Bridge, make sure you have > the bridge-nf patches applied (or use a kernel which includes them) so > netfilter see's the bridged packets. Check out > http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Bridge for more info. > > Configure BWM Tools as usual .. voila. > > > Regards > Nigel > |
|
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-03-28 07:00:46
|
=0AThanks Mr. Nigel=0A=0AIt has been done but it again given some version=
incompetibility error as like =0A=0Alibpng warning: Application was compil=
ed with png.h from libpng-1.0.18=0Alibpng warning: Application is running w=
ith png.c from libpng-1.2.8=0Alibpng error: Incompatible libpng version in =
application and library Graphing flows.... done (481*210)=0A=0A=0ASo how ca=
n i overcome this incompatibality....=0A=0ARegards=0A=0ARajveer Singh=0A=0A=
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 Nigel Kukard wrote :=0A>Hi,=0A>=0A> >=0A> > I tried v20=
0603080716 snapshot. All were fine. But when i tried to=0A> > generate grap=
hs with the bwm_graph command it generated same error as=0A> > on prior ver=
sion v.2.3.=0A> >=0A>=0A>Does the directory /var/bwm_tools exist? this i=
s not automatically=0A>created when BWM Tools is installed.=0A>=0A>=0A>-Nig=
el=0A>=0A> > ********************************************************=0A> >=
linux:~#bwm_graph --flows=3D"machine2(size_bit)" --start=3D"2006/03/27=0A>=
> 11:00" --end=3D"2006/03/28 11:00"=0A> > BWM Graph v200603080716 - Copyri=
ght (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems=0A> > Design=0A> >=0A> > Creating RRD=
files...=0A> > Processing /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat... ERROR!=0A> > ER=
ROR: Failed to open /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such file or=0A> > dire=
ctory=0A> > Writing data to RRD files...=0A> > Processing file /var/bwm=
_tools/machine2.dat... ERROR!=0A> > Error: Failed opening file /var/bwm_too=
ls/machine2.dat: No such file=0A> > or directory=0A> > linux:~#=0A> > *****=
*****************************************************=0A> >=0A> > please as=
sist me where is the mistake.=0A> >=0A> > With thanks & regards=0A> >=0A> >=
Rajveer Singh=0A> >=0A> > On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 Nigel Kukard wrote :=0A> > >=
=0A> > > >=0A> > > > I saw a new version of bwm-tools has been released. so=
i donwloaded=0A> > > > 2.3 version of bwm-tools and installed. really it h=
ave been installed=0A> > > > without any difficulty and starts working then=
it's prior version 2.2.=0A> > > >=0A> > > > but when i tried to graphs wit=
h the bwm_graph commands as below, some=0A> > > > some errors have been pro=
duced. It is showing as you can see below=0A> > > > that Failed opening fi=
le /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No=0A> > > > such file or directo=
ry. when i searchout this path. there was not any=0A> > > > such file or d=
irectory. This issue was also in prior version. where i=0A> > > > relolved =
this issue by creating soft link of /var/bwm_tools to=0A> > > > /usr/local/=
var/bwm_tools/.[Thanks to Mr. Kobe, Who guided me online by=0A> > > > yahoo=
messenger]. So i tried to searchout where this file machine2.dat=0A> > > >=
file is actually creating. I tried to searchout. but no file has been=0A> =
> > > found with such name. So any one of you have idea please let me know,=
=0A> > > > where i'm making a mistake.=0A> > > >=0A> > >The latest developm=
ent snapshot of bwm_tools defaults its data dir to=0A> > >hard coded /var/b=
wm_tools, there was a bug in one of the version of=0A> > >bwm_tools where b=
wmd created the data files in a different directory=0A> > >than what bwm_gr=
aph looked in. Again, all these issues are resolved in=0A> > >latest develo=
pment snapshot.=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > >-Nigel=0A> > >=0A> > > > ***********=
**************************************=0A> > > > linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_to=
ols-0.2.3/doc # bwm_graph=0A> > > > --flows=3D"machine2(size_bit)"=0A> > > =
> --start=3D"2006/03/25 15:00" --end=3D"2006/03/25 18:00"=0A> > > > BWM Gr=
aph v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design=0A> > > >=
=0A> > > > Creating RRD files...=0A> > > > Failed opening file /usr/local/v=
ar/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such=0A> > > > file or direc =
tory=0A> > > > Getting details for=0A> > > > =
/usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...Writing data to=0A> > > > =
RRD files...=0A> > > > Failed opening file /usr/local/var=
/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such=0A> > > > file or direc =
tory=0A> > > > Processing file=0A> > > > /usr/l=
ocal/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/=0A> > > >=0A> > > > =
linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc #=0A> > > >=0A> > > > *************=
*********************************************=0A> > > >=0A> > > >=0A> > > >=
With thanks & regards=0A> > > >=0A> > > > Rajveer Singh=0A> >=0A>=0A |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-03-28 05:56:50
|
Hi Shannon, > > Could i run this on a linux server that is bridged? Yep. > i want to drop a box on the inside of our firewall between the network > and the firewall to monitor/shape/report on all our internal subnets. > > Like would I be able to shape 192.168.50 addresses to 7M/s and > 192.168.1 addresses to 10M/s and use the rest to allocate to our web > server to use. Then be able to get monthly reports on how much each > has used? All this on a transparent bridge? For the briding, just setup a normal Linux Bridge, make sure you have the bridge-nf patches applied (or use a kernel which includes them) so netfilter see's the bridged packets. Check out http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Bridge for more info. Configure BWM Tools as usual .. voila. Regards Nigel |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-03-28 05:54:47
|
Hi, > > I tried v200603080716 snapshot. All were fine. But when i tried to > generate graphs with the bwm_graph command it generated same error as > on prior version v.2.3. > Does the directory /var/bwm_tools exist? this is not automatically created when BWM Tools is installed. -Nigel > ******************************************************** > linux:~#bwm_graph --flows="machine2(size_bit)" --start="2006/03/27 > 11:00" --end="2006/03/28 11:00" > BWM Graph v200603080716 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems > Design > > Creating RRD files... > Processing /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat... ERROR! > ERROR: Failed to open /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such file or > directory > Writing data to RRD files... > Processing file /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat... ERROR! > Error: Failed opening file /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such file > or directory > linux:~# > ********************************************************** > > please assist me where is the mistake. > > With thanks & regards > > Rajveer Singh > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 Nigel Kukard wrote : > > > > > > > > I saw a new version of bwm-tools has been released. so i donwloaded > > > 2.3 version of bwm-tools and installed. really it have been installed > > > without any difficulty and starts working then it's prior version 2.2. > > > > > > but when i tried to graphs with the bwm_graph commands as below, some > > > some errors have been produced. It is showing as you can see below > > > that Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No > > > such file or directory. when i searchout this path. there was not any > > > such file or directory. This issue was also in prior version. where i > > > relolved this issue by creating soft link of /var/bwm_tools to > > > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/.[Thanks to Mr. Kobe, Who guided me online by > > > yahoo messenger]. So i tried to searchout where this file machine2.dat > > > file is actually creating. I tried to searchout. but no file has been > > > found with such name. So any one of you have idea please let me know, > > > where i'm making a mistake. > > > > >The latest development snapshot of bwm_tools defaults its data dir to > >hard coded /var/bwm_tools, there was a bug in one of the version of > >bwm_tools where bwmd created the data files in a different directory > >than what bwm_graph looked in. Again, all these issues are resolved in > >latest development snapshot. > > > > > >-Nigel > > > > > ************************************************* > > > linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc # bwm_graph > > > --flows="machine2(size_bit)" > > > --start="2006/03/25 15:00" --end="2006/03/25 18:00" > > > BWM Graph v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design > > > > > > Creating RRD files... > > > Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such > > > file or direc tory > > > Getting details for > > > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...Writing data to > > > RRD files... > > > Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such > > > file or direc tory > > > Processing file > > > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/ > > > > > > linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc # > > > > > > ********************************************************** > > > > > > > > > With thanks & regards > > > > > > Rajveer Singh > |
|
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-03-28 05:48:17
|
=0ADear Mr. Kukard,=0A=0AI tried v200603080716 snapshot. All were fine. B=
ut when i tried to generate graphs with the bwm_graph command it generated =
same error as on prior version v.2.3.=0A***********************************=
*********************=0Alinux:~#bwm_graph --flows=3D"machine2(size_bit)" --=
start=3D"2006/03/27 11:00" --end=3D"2006/03/28 11:00"=0ABWM Graph v20060308=
0716 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design=0A=0ACreating RRD=
files...=0A Processing /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat... ERROR!=0AERROR: Fa=
iled to open /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such file or directory=0A Wr=
iting data to RRD files...=0A Processing file /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat=
... ERROR!=0AError: Failed opening file /var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No suc=
h file or directory=0Alinux:~#=0A******************************************=
****************=0A=0Aplease assist me where is the mistake.=0A=0AWith than=
ks & regards=0A=0ARajveer Singh=0A=0AOn Sun, 26 Mar 2006 Nigel Kukard wrote=
:=0A>=0A> >=0A> > I saw a new version of bwm-tools has been released. so i=
donwloaded=0A> > 2.3 version of bwm-tools and installed. really it have be=
en installed=0A> > without any difficulty and starts working then it's prio=
r version 2.2.=0A> >=0A> > but when i tried to graphs with the bwm_graph co=
mmands as below, some=0A> > some errors have been produced. It is showing =
as you can see below=0A> > that Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tool=
s/machine2.dat: No=0A> > such file or directory. when i searchout this pat=
h. there was not any=0A> > such file or directory. This issue was also in p=
rior version. where i=0A> > relolved this issue by creating soft link of /v=
ar/bwm_tools to=0A> > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/.[Thanks to Mr. Kobe, Who gu=
ided me online by=0A> > yahoo messenger]. So i tried to searchout where thi=
s file machine2.dat=0A> > file is actually creating. I tried to searchout. =
but no file has been=0A> > found with such name. So any one of you have ide=
a please let me know,=0A> > where i'm making a mistake.=0A> >=0A>The latest=
development snapshot of bwm_tools defaults its data dir to=0A>hard coded /=
var/bwm_tools, there was a bug in one of the version of=0A>bwm_tools where =
bwmd created the data files in a different directory=0A>than what bwm_graph=
looked in. Again, all these issues are resolved in=0A>latest development s=
napshot.=0A>=0A>=0A>-Nigel=0A>=0A> > **************************************=
***********=0A> > linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc # bwm_graph=0A> >=
--flows=3D"machine2(size_bit)"=0A> > --start=3D"2006/03/25 15:00" --end=
=3D"2006/03/25 18:00"=0A> > BWM Graph v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linu=
x Based Systems Design=0A> >=0A> > Creating RRD files...=0A> > Failed openi=
ng file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such=0A> > file or direc =
tory=0A> > Getting details f=
or=0A> > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...Writing data to=0A> > =
RRD files...=0A> > Failed opening file /usr/local/v=
ar/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such=0A> > file or direc =
tory=0A> > Processing file=0A> > /usr/local/var/=
bwm_tools/machine2.dat...linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/=0A> >=0A> > linux:/tmp/bwmbui=
ld/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc #=0A> >=0A> > **************************************=
********************=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > With thanks & regards=0A> >=0A> > Ra=
jveer Singh=0A |
|
From: Shannan S. <sha...@me...> - 2006-03-28 02:23:03
|
Could i run this on a linux server that is bridged? i want to drop a box on the inside of our firewall between the network and the firewall to monitor/shape/report on all our internal subnets. Like would I be able to shape 192.168.50 addresses to 7M/s and 192.168.1 addresses to 10M/s and use the rest to allocate to our web server to use. Then be able to get monthly reports on how much each has used? All this on a transparent bridge? Shannan Summers Network Administrator sha...@me... 0421 511 470 ||| 07 3853 5437 Mercury Mobility Cellnet Group Australia 59 - 61 Qantas Drive Eagle Farm Brisbane 4009. PO Box 49 Pinkenba 4008 www.mercurymobility.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: The information in this electronic mail message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Internet electronic mail message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by mistake please call the sender immediately on 07 3853 5555 and erase the original message and any attachments. The Company accepts no responsibility for any effects this email message or attachments has on the recipient network or computer system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-03-26 13:02:32
|
> > I saw a new version of bwm-tools has been released. so i donwloaded > 2.3 version of bwm-tools and installed. really it have been installed > without any difficulty and starts working then it's prior version 2.2. > > but when i tried to graphs with the bwm_graph commands as below, some > some errors have been produced. It is showing as you can see below > that Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No > such file or directory. when i searchout this path. there was not any > such file or directory. This issue was also in prior version. where i > relolved this issue by creating soft link of /var/bwm_tools to > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/.[Thanks to Mr. Kobe, Who guided me online by > yahoo messenger]. So i tried to searchout where this file machine2.dat > file is actually creating. I tried to searchout. but no file has been > found with such name. So any one of you have idea please let me know, > where i'm making a mistake. > The latest development snapshot of bwm_tools defaults its data dir to hard coded /var/bwm_tools, there was a bug in one of the version of bwm_tools where bwmd created the data files in a different directory than what bwm_graph looked in. Again, all these issues are resolved in latest development snapshot. -Nigel > ************************************************* > linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc # bwm_graph > --flows="machine2(size_bit)" > --start="2006/03/25 15:00" --end="2006/03/25 18:00" > BWM Graph v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design > > Creating RRD files... > Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such > file or direc tory > Getting details for > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...Writing data to > RRD files... > Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such > file or direc tory > Processing file > /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/ > > linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc # > > ********************************************************** > > > With thanks & regards > > Rajveer Singh > > > > <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3> |
|
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-03-25 11:48:49
|
=0AHello dear guys,=0A=0AI saw a new version of bwm-tools has been releas=
ed. so i donwloaded 2.3 version of bwm-tools and installed. really it have =
been installed without any difficulty and starts working then it's prior ve=
rsion 2.2.=0A=0Abut when i tried to graphs with the bwm_graph commands as b=
elow, some some errors have been produced. It is showing as you can see be=
low that Failed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such=
file or directory. when i searchout this path. there was not any such fil=
e or directory. This issue was also in prior version. where i relolved this=
issue by creating soft link of /var/bwm_tools to /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/=
.[Thanks to Mr. Kobe, Who guided me online by yahoo messenger]. So i tried =
to searchout where this file machine2.dat file is actually creating. I trie=
d to searchout. but no file has been found with such name. So any one of yo=
u have idea please let me know, where i'm making a mistake.=0A=0A**********=
***************************************=0Alinux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2=
.3/doc # bwm_graph --flows=3D"machine2(size_bit)" =
--start=3D"2006/03/25 15:00" --end=3D"2006/03/25 18:00"=
=0ABWM Graph v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design=0A=
=0ACreating RRD files...=0AFailed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/mac=
hine2.dat: No such file or direc =
tory=0A Getting details for /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...Wri=
ting data to RRD files...=0AFai=
led opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat: No such file or dir=
ec tory=0A Processing file /u=
sr/local/var/bwm_tools/machine2.dat...linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/ =
linux:/tmp/bwmbuild/bwm_tools-0.2.3/doc #=0A=0A*=
*********************************************************=0A=0A=0AWith than=
ks & regards=0A=0ARajveer Singh |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-03-08 16:14:23
|
Hi guys, Released of BWM Tools snapshot 200603080716, this snapshot addresses the following... * Support for logging direct to RRD files: report-format * One can now specify the log filename: report-filename * Support for local and forward base shaping: flow-mode * Fixed bugs preventing bwm_graph from running, we now install rrdtool if its built with BWM Tools * Fixed graphing bug, which prevented graphs from being created * Improved error reporting and handling of bwm_graph and bwmd Seeing as bwmd can log direct to rrd files, one can now get live stats and graphs using rrdcgi, ultimately voiding the need for bwm_graph to be run. Projet site: http://freshmeat.net/projects/bwmtools/ Kind Regards Nigel Kukard |
|
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-03-03 09:29:39
|
=0ADear Guys,=0A=0A=0AI would like to create graphs of my traffic. I can = monitor traffice with bwm_monitor command.=0AWhen i tried to create a comma= nd with this command: -=0Alinux:~ # bwm_graph --flows=3D"traffic(size_bit)"= --start=3D"2006/03/03 14:46" --end=3D"2003/03/03 14:48"=0ABWM Graph v0.2.2= - Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Linux Based Systems Design=0A=0ACreating RRD fil= es...=0AFailed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/traffic.dat: No such f= ile or directory=0A Getting details for /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/traffic= .dat...Writing data to RRD files...=0AFailed opening file /usr/local/var/bw= m_tools/traffic.dat: No such file or directory=0A Processing file /usr/l= ocal/var/bwm_tools/traffic.dat...linux:~ #=0A=0Alinux:~ # bwm_graph --flows= =3D"traffic(size_bit)" --start=3D"2006/03/03 14:46" --end=3D"2003/03/03 14:= 48"=0ABWM Graph v0.2.2 - Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Linux Based Systems Design= =0A=0ACreating RRD files...=0AFailed opening file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/= traffic.dat: No such file or directory=0A Getting details for /usr/local= /var/bwm_tools/traffic.dat...Writing data to RRD files...=0AFailed opening = file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/traffic.dat: No such file or directory=0A = Processing file /usr/local/var/bwm_tools/traffic.dat...linux:~ #=0A=0Alinux= :/usr/local/var/bwm_tools #=0A=0A=0Ayou can see /usr/local/var/bwm_tools di= rector exist but there is no file exist with the name of traffice.dat.=0A= =0ASo please let me know where is the mistakes=0A=0AWith Thanks & Regards= =0A=0ARajveer Singh=0A=0A=0A=0A |
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-03-03 07:28:39
|
Hi TheFinn > I downloaded version 0.2.2 today and tried to compile, am getting the > following error, keep in mind, i have rrdtool installed locally > anyhow. You're using rrdtool 1.0.x, if you're using rrdtool 1.2.x you must specify ... --with-rrdtool2 Specify that you want BWM Tools built against rrdtool 1.2.x Regards Nigel > > Thanks > TheFinn. > > > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -pthread > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > -DLOG_DIR=\"/usr/local/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0 -g -O2 -MT > bwm_graph-graph.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o > bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c' || echo './'`graph.c; \ > then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; > else rm -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > graph.c: In function ?writeGraphs?: > graph.c:633: error: too few arguments to function ?rrd_graph? > make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-0.2.3/bwm_graph' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-0.2.3' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > -- Nigel Kukard, PhD CompSc (Chief Executive Officer) Linux Based Systems Design Web: www.lbsd.net Email: nk...@lb... Tel: (+27) 023 349 8000 Cell: (+27) 082 333 3723 Fax: (+27) 023 349 1395 Support: 086 747 7600 Address: LIGT House, 2 Klipdrift Rd, Rawsonville Linux Systems Design & Technology Solutions The best language to use is the language that was designed for what you want to use it for. ===================================================================== Disclaimer ---------- The contents of this message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee's use and may be legally privileged and/or confidential information. This message may not be retained, distributed, copied or used if you are not he addressee of this message. If this message was sent to you in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then destroy the message and any copies thereof. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message may be personal to the sender and is not that of Linux Based Systems Design, LinuxRulz or any of it's subsideries, associated companies or principals and is therefore not endorsed by Linux Based Systems Design or LinuxRulz. Due to e-maill communication being insecure, Linux Based Systems Design and LinuxRulz do not guarantee confidentiality, security, accuracy or performance of the e-mail. Any liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent. |
|
From: thefinn <the...@gm...> - 2006-03-01 00:40:56
|
I downloaded version 0.2.2 today and tried to compile, am getting the following error, keep in mind, i have rrdtool installed locally anyhow. Thanks TheFinn. if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -DLOG_DIR=\"/usr/local/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0 -g -O2 -MT bwm_graph-graph.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c' || echo './'`graph.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi graph.c: In function ‘writeGraphs’: graph.c:633: error: too few arguments to function ‘rrd_graph’ make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-0.2.3/bwm_graph' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-0.2.3' make: *** [all] Error 2 |
|
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-02-28 05:22:39
|
Hello guys,=0A=0AI'm sorry, but I'm trying so hard to get success with this=
tool.=0AI don't want to leave any of the possible way to try this tool. I =
appreciate u guys providing help. I'm sending this mail lastly in hope , po=
ssibly, i may be able to do running this tool.=0A=0A=0ASo today, I tried a =
last and new way. I'm trying to monitor the traffice of main line which is =
connected to this system. so My configuration file is as below=0A=0ASTEP:#1=
=0A=0Alinux:~ # cat /etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml=0A<firewall>=0A # G=
lobal configuration and access classes=0A <global>=0A<modules>=0A =
<load name=3D"ip_queue"/>=0A</modules>=0A</global>=0A # Acce=
ss control lists=0A # Network address translation=0A # Traf=
fic flows=0A <traffic>=0A # Rate can be specified in either=
IN, OUT or TOTAL (rate-total)=0A # If rate-total =3D=3D 0, no rate=
limits=0A<flow name=3D"traffic" max-rate=3D"64000" report-timeout=3D"60" n=
fmark=3D"100"/>=0A</traffic>=0A</firewall>=0Alinux:~ #=0A=0ASTEP:#2=0A=0AI =
configured my firewall as below:=0Alinux:~ # iptables -L -n -v=0AChain INPU=
T (policy ACCEPT 8274 packets, 2729K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot =
opt in out source destination=0A 0 0 QUEUE =
all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK ma=
tch !0x0=0A=0AChain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)=0A pkts byt=
es target prot opt in out source destination=0A =
15 955 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/=
0 MARK match !0x0=0A 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * =
0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0=0A=0AChain OUTP=
UT (policy ACCEPT 6564 packets, 1344K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot=
opt in out source destination=0A 0 0 QUEUE =
all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK m=
atch !0x0=0Alinux:~ #=0A=0Alinux:~ # iptables -L -n -v -t mangle=0AChain PR=
EROUTING (policy ACCEPT 9720 packets, 2911K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target =
prot opt in out source destination=0A=0AChain INPUT=
(policy ACCEPT 8292 packets, 2731K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot o=
pt in out source destination=0A=0AChain FORWARD (poli=
cy ACCEPT 20 packets, 1265 bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt in =
out source destination=0A 15 955 MARK all --=
* * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x64=0A=
=0AChain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 6564 packets, 1344K bytes)=0A pkts bytes ta=
rget prot opt in out source destination=0A=0AChai=
n POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 6581 packets, 1346K bytes)=0A pkts bytes targ=
et prot opt in out source destination=0A=0AChain =
bwmd (0 references)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt in out sourc=
e destination=0A 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * =
0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0=0A 0 0 =
ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0=0Alinux:~=
#=0A=0ASTEP:#3=0A=0Astarted my bwmd daemon=0A=0AThen i run the following c=
ommand; -=0A=0A#bwm_monitor=0A=0AIt shows some traffic going through it. I =
was really so happy but only 15 packets forwared through it. after it stops=
working. i continuously tried access internet. but neiter the counter were=
increasing in #iptabls -L -v -n -t mangle nor any traffic through bwm_moni=
tor.=0A=0A=0AI got totally hopeless with this tool. If u guys have any othe=
r tools to try out. Please suggest.=0A=0A=0AWith thanks & regards=0A=0ARajv=
eer Singh=0A=0AOn Mon, 27 Feb 2006 Kobe Lenjou wrote :=0A >Then your rules =
are wrong ;-)=0A >=0A >You should be able to figure this ons out!=0A >=0A >=
Check:=0A >- the ip adresses used=0A >- try other 'general rules' like 'eac=
h packet coming on 'eth0' (or whatever you lan interface is)=0A >=0A |
|
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-02-27 13:20:12
|
=0AHello guys,=0A=0AI'm sorry, but I'm trying so hard to get success with=
this tool.=0AI don't want to leave any of the possible way to try this too=
l. I appreciate u guys providing help. I'm sending this mail lastly in hope=
, possibly, i may be able to do running this tool.=0A=0A=0ASo today, I tri=
ed a last and new way. I'm trying to monitor the traffice of main line whic=
h is connected to this system. so My configuration file is as below=0A=0AST=
EP:#1=0A=0Alinux:~ # cat /etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml=0A<firewall>=0A =
# Global configuration and access classes=0A <global>=0A<modules>=
=0A <load name=3D"ip_queue"/>=0A</modules>=0A</global>=0A # A=
ccess control lists=0A # Network address translation=0A # Tra=
ffic flows=0A <traffic>=0A # Rate can be specified in either =
IN, OUT or TOTAL (rate-total)=0A # If rate-total =3D=3D 0, no rate l=
imits=0A<flow name=3D"traffic" max-rate=3D"64000" report-timeout=3D"60" nfm=
ark=3D"100"/>=0A</traffic>=0A</firewall>=0Alinux:~ #=0A=0ASTEP:#2=0A=0AI co=
nfigured my firewall as below: =0Alinux:~ # iptables -L -n -v=0AChain INPUT=
(policy ACCEPT 8274 packets, 2729K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot op=
t in out source destination=0A 0 0 QUEUE =
all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match=
!0x0=0A=0AChain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)=0A pkts bytes t=
arget prot opt in out source destination=0A 15 =
955 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 =
MARK match !0x0=0A 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0=
.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0=0A=0AChain OUTPUT (po=
licy ACCEPT 6564 packets, 1344K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt in=
out source destination=0A 0 0 QUEUE all =
-- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x=
0=0Alinux:~ #=0A=0Alinux:~ # iptables -L -n -v -t mangle=0AChain PREROUTING=
(policy ACCEPT 9720 packets, 2911K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot op=
t in out source destination=0A=0AChain INPUT (policy =
ACCEPT 8292 packets, 2731K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt in =
out source destination=0A=0AChain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT =
20 packets, 1265 bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt in out so=
urce destination=0A 15 955 MARK all -- * * =
0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x64=0A=0AChain OUTP=
UT (policy ACCEPT 6564 packets, 1344K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot =
opt in out source destination=0A=0AChain POSTROUTING =
(policy ACCEPT 6581 packets, 1346K bytes)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt=
in out source destination=0A=0AChain bwmd (0 referen=
ces)=0A pkts bytes target prot opt in out source =
destination=0A 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 =
0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0=0A 0 0 ACCEPT all --=
* * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0=0Alinux:~ #=0A=0ASTEP:#3=0A=
=0Astarted my bwmd daemon=0A=0AThen i run the following command; -=0A=0A#bw=
m_monitor=0A=0AIt shows some traffic going through it. I was really so happ=
y but only 15 packets forwared through it. after it stops working. i contin=
uously tried access internet. but neiter the counter were increasing in #ip=
tabls -L -v -n -t mangle nor any traffic through bwm_monitor.=0A=0A=0AI got=
totally hopeless with this tool. If u guys have any other tools to try out=
. Please suggest.=0A=0A=0AWith thanks & regards=0A=0ARajveer Singh=0A=0AOn =
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 Kobe Lenjou wrote :=0A>Then your rules are wrong ;-)=0A>=
=0A>You should be able to figure this ons out!=0A>=0A>Check:=0A>- the ip ad=
resses used=0A>- try other 'general rules' like 'each packet coming on 'eth=
0' (or whatever you lan interface is)=0A>=0A>rajveer singh wrote:=0A>>=0A>>=
Dear Mr, Kobe,=0A>>i checked it with bwm_monitor, there was not movement in=
traffice. I'm 100% sure that bwmd deamen is already running as u can see t=
he following output: -=0A>>linux:~ # ps -aux|grep bwmd=0A>>Warning: bad ps =
syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See http://procps.sf.net/faq.html=0A>>root =
6842 0.0 0.3 12144 1632 ? Ssl 10:24 0:00 bwmd=0A>>root =
7196 0.0 0.1 1828 612 pts/1 S+ 10:34 0:00 grep bwmd=0A>>linux:~ #=
=0A>>=0A>>And this please this is the output of bwm_monitor=0A>>=0A>>BWM Mo=
nitor v0.2.2 - Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Linux Based Systems Design ├&#=
9472;──────────=
──────────γ=
2;──────────	=
472;──────────&=
#9472;───┐│ =
=
││ ┌─────γ=
2;────────┐ =
=
││ │ main_line │ =
=
││ │-flow_machine1│ =
=
││ │ flow_machine2│ ┌=
─┤ Traffic Flow: flow_machine1 ├───^=
72;──────────&#=
9472;──────┐ =
││ └────&#=
9472;─────────┘=
│ │ =
││ =
│ Limits: │ =
││ &#=
9474; │ =
││ │=
; Max Rate : 16000 Burst Rate: 32000 │ =
││ │ Qu=
eue Len: 64 Queue Size: 16384 │ =
││ │ =
│ =
││ │ Current: =
│ =
││ │ =
│ =
││ │ Rate : =
0 Rate Avg : 0 │ =
││ │ Pkt/s : 0 =
Pkt/s Avg : 0 │ =
││ │ Queue Len: 0.00% Queue=
Size: 0.00% │ 	=
474;│ │ Bursts : 0 Drops : =
0 │ │	=
474; │ =
│ ││=
│ =
│ ││ =
│ Press any key to quit... =
│ ││ =
└───────γ=
2;──────────	=
472;──────────&=
#9472;──────────=
;──────────^=
72;──┘ =0A>>=0A>>this is a output of iptables -L -n=
-v=0A>>linux:~ # iptables -L -v -n=0A>>Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 185 pack=
ets, 49326 bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt in out source =
destination=0A>>8484 3253K bwmd all -- * * 0.0.0=
.0/0 0.0.0.0/0=0A>>=0A>>Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, =
0 bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt in out source =
destination=0A>> 5 310 bwmd all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 =
0.0.0.0/0=0A>>=0A>>Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 8732 packets, 3148K =
bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt in out source d=
estination=0A>>=0A>>Chain bwmd (2 references)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot=
opt in out source destination=0A>> 5 310 QUEUE =
all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match=
!0x0=0A>>8483 3253K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 =
0.0.0.0/0=0A>>linux:~ #=0A>>=0A>>and this is a output of iptables -L -n -v =
-t mangle=0A>>linux:~ # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle=0A>>Chain PREROUTING (p=
olicy ACCEPT 10069 packets, 3604K bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt =
in out source destination=0A>>=0A>>Chain INPUT (policy A=
CCEPT 9160 packets, 3494K bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt in ou=
t source destination=0A>>=0A>>Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT =
5 packets, 310 bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt in out source=
destination=0A>> 0 0 MARK tcp -- * * =
192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3e9=0A>> 5 310 MARK=
udp -- * * 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0/0 MARK s=
et 0x3e9=0A>> 0 0 MARK tcp -- * * 192.168.0.2 =
0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3ea=0A>> 0 0 MARK udp -- * =
* 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3ea=0A>>=0A>=
>Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 9253 packets, 3338K bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes targ=
et prot opt in out source destination=0A>>=0A>>Chain =
POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 9258 packets, 3338K bytes)=0A>>pkts bytes target=
prot opt in out source destination=0A>>=0A>>Chain bw=
md (0 references)=0A>>pkts bytes target prot opt in out source =
destination=0A>> 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0=
.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0=0A>> 0 0 ACCEPT=
all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0=0A>>linux:~ #=0A>=
>=0A>>You can see in mangle table's bwmd chain, the counter is not going up=
where as the bwmd chain of filter chain is happening something. Please see=
and suggest me where i'm making mistakes=0A>>=0A>>With thanks & regards=0A=
>>=0A>>Rajveer Singh=0A>>=0A>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 Kobe Lenjou wrote :=0A>> =
>Did you check the good working with 'bwm_monitor' and is the bwmd deamon r=
unning?=0A>> >=0A>> >Also, try iptables -L -n -v to see any counters going =
up=0A>> >=0A>> >Greetz=0A>> >Kobe=0A>> >=0A>> >rajveer singh wrote:=0A>> >>=
=0A>> >> Hi all,=0A>> >>=0A>> >>Thanks Mr. Kobe for providing steps it hel=
ps me a lot. but i goes to monitor there nothing is happening.=0A>> >>my /e=
tc/bwm_tools/firewall's contents are as below=0A>> >>=0A>> >> # Global c=
onfiguration and access classes=0A>> >>=0A>> >>=0A>> >>=0A>> >> <glo=
bal>=0A>> >><modules>=0A>> >> <load name=3D"ip_queue"/>=0A>> >></mod=
ules>=0A>> >> <class name=3D"out_machine1">=0A>> >><address name=3D"=
out_machine1_tcp" proto=3D"tcp" src=3D"192.168.0.1"/>=0A>> >><address name=
=3D"out_machine1_udp" proto=3D"udp" src=3D"192.168.0.1"/>=0A>> >></class>=
=0A>> >>=0A>> >> <class name=3D"out_machine2">=0A>> >><address name=
=3D"out_machine2_tcp" proto=3D"tcp" src=3D"192.168.0.2"/>=0A>> >><address =
name=3D"out_machine2_udp" proto=3D"udp" src=3D"192.168.0.2"/>=0A>> >></cla=
ss>=0A>> >>=0A>> >></global>=0A>> >>=0A>> >>=0A>> >> # Access contro=
l lists=0A>> >> # Network address translation=0A>> >> # Traff=
ic flows=0A>> >>=0A>> >> <traffic>=0A>> >>=0A>> >> # Rate can=
be specified in either IN, OUT or TOTAL (rate-total)=0A>> >> # If r=
ate-total =3D=3D 0, no rate limits=0A>> >>=0A>> >>=0A>> >><flow name=3D"mai=
n_line" stats-len=3D"5" queue-size=3D"262144" queue-len=3D"400" max-rate=3D=
"64000" burst-rate=3D"65000" report-timeout=3D"60">=0A>> >> <flow na=
me=3D"flow_machine1" max-rate=3D"16000" burst-rate=3D"32000" queue-size=3D"=
16384" report-timeout=3D"60">=0A>> >> <queue prio=3D"99" nfm=
ark=3D"1001">=0A>> >> out_machine1;=0A>> >> =
</queue>=0A>> >> </flow>=0A>> >> <flow name=3D"flow_ma=
chine2" max-rate=3D"16000" burst-rate=3D"32000" queue-size=3D"16384" report=
-timeout=3D"60">=0A>> >> <queue prio=3D"99" nfmark=3D"1002">=
=0A>> >> out_machine2;=0A>> >> </queu=
e>=0A>> >> </flow>=0A>> >></flow>=0A>> >></traffic>=0A>> >></firewal=
l>=0A>> >>=0A>> >>and my contents of /etc/sysconfig/iptables are as below:=
=0A>> >>=0A>> >># Generated using BWM Firewall v0.2.2: Sat Feb 25 18:06:44 =
2006=0A>> >>=0A>> >>*mangle=0A>> >>:OUTPUT ACCEPT=0A>> >>:INPUT ACCEPT=0A>>=
>>:FORWARD ACCEPT=0A>> >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.1 --protocol tcp -=
j MARK --set-mark 1001=0A>> >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.1 --protocol u=
dp -j MARK --set-mark 1001=0A>> >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.2 --proto=
col tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1002=0A>> >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.2 --=
protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1002=0A>> >>COMMIT=0A>> >>*filter=0A>> >>=
:OUTPUT ACCEPT=0A>> >>:bwmd -=0A>> >>:INPUT ACCEPT=0A>> >>:FORWARD ACCEPT=
=0A>> >>-A bwmd -m mark ! --mark 0 -j QUEUE=0A>> >>COMMIT=0A>> >>=0A>> >>wh=
en i tried to create graph as per below=0A>> >>linux:~ # bwm_graph --flow=
=3D"out_machine1 --start=3D"2006/02/25 18:28" --end=3D"2006/02/25 18:30" ou=
tput=3D/etc/file1=0A>> >> >=0A>> >> >=0A>> >> >=0A>> >> >=0A>> >> >=0A>> >>=
>=0A>> >>nothing happen=0A>> >>=0A>> >>I'm thinking it's some problem in m=
y firewall setup. I tried to recognise it. but unable to find it.=0A>> >>=
=0A>> >>=0A>> >>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>><http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWo=
rks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTN=
ER=3D3>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>----------------------------------------------------=
---=0A>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting l=
anguage=0A>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the =
live webcast=0A>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new c=
oding territory!=0A>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&=
bid=3D241720&dat=3D121642=0A>______________________________________________=
_=0A>bwm-tools-tech mailing list=0A>bwm...@li...=0A=
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech=0A |
|
From: Kobe L. <ko...@mo...> - 2006-02-27 06:06:35
|
Then your rules are wrong ;-) You should be able to figure this ons out! Check: - the ip adresses used - try other 'general rules' like 'each packet coming on 'eth0' (or whatever you lan interface is) rajveer singh wrote: > > Dear Mr, Kobe, > i checked it with bwm_monitor, there was not movement in traffice. I'm > 100% sure that bwmd deamen is already running as u can see the > following output: - > linux:~ # ps -aux|grep bwmd > Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See > http://procps.sf.net/faq.html > root 6842 0.0 0.3 12144 1632 ? Ssl 10:24 0:00 bwmd > root 7196 0.0 0.1 1828 612 pts/1 S+ 10:34 0:00 grep bwmd > linux:~ # > > And this please this is the output of bwm_monitor > > BWM Monitor v0.2.2 - Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Linux Based Systems > Design > ├───────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ > > ││ > ┌──────────────┐ > > ││ │ main_line > │ > ││ > │-flow_machine1│ > > ││ │ flow_machine2│ ┌─┤ > Traffic Flow: flow_machine1 > ├─────────────────────┐ > ││ > └──────────────┘ > │ > │ ││ > │ Limits: > │ ││ > │ > │ > ││ │ Max Rate : 16000 > Burst Rate: 32000 │ > ││ │ Queue Len: > 64 Queue Size: 16384 │ > ││ │ > │ > ││ │ Current: > │ > ││ │ > │ > ││ │ > Rate : 0 Rate Avg : 0 │ > ││ > │ Pkt/s : 0 Pkt/s Avg : 0 │ > ││ > │ Queue Len: 0.00% Queue Size: 0.00% │ > ││ > │ Bursts : 0 Drops : 0 > │ ││ > │ > │ ││ > │ > │ > ││ │ Press any key > to quit... │ > ││ > └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ > > > > this is a output of iptables -L -n -v > linux:~ # iptables -L -v -n > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 185 packets, 49326 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 8484 3253K bwmd all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 5 310 bwmd all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 8732 packets, 3148K bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain bwmd (2 references) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 5 310 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 > 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0 > 8483 3253K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > linux:~ # > > and this is a output of iptables -L -n -v -t mangle > linux:~ # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle > Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 10069 packets, 3604K bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 9160 packets, 3494K bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 5 packets, 310 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 0 0 MARK tcp -- * * 192.168.0.1 > 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3e9 > 5 310 MARK udp -- * * 192.168.0.1 > 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3e9 > 0 0 MARK tcp -- * * 192.168.0.2 > 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3ea > 0 0 MARK udp -- * * 192.168.0.2 > 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3ea > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 9253 packets, 3338K bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 9258 packets, 3338K bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain bwmd (0 references) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 > 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0 > 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > linux:~ # > > You can see in mangle table's bwmd chain, the counter is not going up > where as the bwmd chain of filter chain is happening something. Please > see and suggest me where i'm making mistakes > > With thanks & regards > > Rajveer Singh > > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 Kobe Lenjou wrote : > >Did you check the good working with 'bwm_monitor' and is the bwmd > deamon running? > > > >Also, try iptables -L -n -v to see any counters going up > > > >Greetz > >Kobe > > > >rajveer singh wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >>Thanks Mr. Kobe for providing steps it helps me a lot. but i goes to > monitor there nothing is happening. > >>my /etc/bwm_tools/firewall's contents are as below > >> > >> # Global configuration and access classes > >> > >> > >> > >> <global> > >><modules> > >> <load name="ip_queue"/> > >></modules> > >> <class name="out_machine1"> > >><address name="out_machine1_tcp" proto="tcp" src="192.168.0.1"/> > >><address name="out_machine1_udp" proto="udp" src="192.168.0.1"/> > >></class> > >> > >> <class name="out_machine2"> > >><address name="out_machine2_tcp" proto="tcp" src="192.168.0.2"/> > >><address name="out_machine2_udp" proto="udp" src="192.168.0.2"/> > >></class> > >> > >></global> > >> > >> > >> # Access control lists > >> # Network address translation > >> # Traffic flows > >> > >> <traffic> > >> > >> # Rate can be specified in either IN, OUT or TOTAL (rate-total) > >> # If rate-total == 0, no rate limits > >> > >> > >><flow name="main_line" stats-len="5" queue-size="262144" > queue-len="400" max-rate="64000" burst-rate="65000" report-timeout="60"> > >> <flow name="flow_machine1" max-rate="16000" > burst-rate="32000" queue-size="16384" report-timeout="60"> > >> <queue prio="99" nfmark="1001"> > >> out_machine1; > >> </queue> > >> </flow> > >> <flow name="flow_machine2" max-rate="16000" > burst-rate="32000" queue-size="16384" report-timeout="60"> > >> <queue prio="99" nfmark="1002"> > >> out_machine2; > >> </queue> > >> </flow> > >></flow> > >></traffic> > >></firewall> > >> > >>and my contents of /etc/sysconfig/iptables are as below: > >> > >># Generated using BWM Firewall v0.2.2: Sat Feb 25 18:06:44 2006 > >> > >>*mangle > >>:OUTPUT ACCEPT > >>:INPUT ACCEPT > >>:FORWARD ACCEPT > >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.1 --protocol tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1001 > >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.1 --protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1001 > >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.2 --protocol tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1002 > >>-A FORWARD --source 192.168.0.2 --protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1002 > >>COMMIT > >>*filter > >>:OUTPUT ACCEPT > >>:bwmd - > >>:INPUT ACCEPT > >>:FORWARD ACCEPT > >>-A bwmd -m mark ! --mark 0 -j QUEUE > >>COMMIT > >> > >>when i tried to create graph as per below > >>linux:~ # bwm_graph --flow="out_machine1 --start="2006/02/25 18:28" > --end="2006/02/25 18:30" output=/etc/file1 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>nothing happen > >> > >>I'm thinking it's some problem in my firewall setup. I tried to > recognise it. but unable to find it. > >> > >> > >> > > > > <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3> |
11 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
