bwm-tools-tech Mailing List for Bandwidth Management Tools (Page 6)
Brought to you by:
nkukard
You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(8) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(6) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-07-28 14:44:42
|
Hi, > Almost 5 hours and no problems so far, neither on RAM or CPU as well. > =20 Great. > If it can saturate a gigabit card, then its really good in fact better = than > commercial products I know. :) > What do you mean renicing bwm?? > =20 Giving it a higher scheduling priority, normally user-initiated apps will run with priority 0. With -20 being highest and 20 being lowest. Re-nicing to say -5 on the threads responsible for grabbing and delivering packets would give it higher priority than apps being run on the box. Regards Nigel |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-28 06:55:27
|
Almost 5 hours and no problems so far, neither on RAM or CPU as well. If it can saturate a gigabit card, then its really good in fact better than commercial products I know. Fantastic Job Nigel and thanks to all who have helped in developing this product. What do you mean renicing bwm?? Regards Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:55 PM To: ra...@sw... Cc: bwm...@li... Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration > Ok changed IPQ_BUFSIZE to 16384 and recompiled and it seems to be > working for the last 5 minutes without any errors. Will keep you posted. Cool .... only drawback is bwm will now eat ram like its going out of fashion ... not tooo bad though, I'll try address the problem in the next development release. > > Please advise if you want me to do anything else on the box. > > CPU usage is also around 1-3% only. Great ... > > Thanks very much for your help. > > What are the limitations of bwm? I will be playing around with the > graphing utilities and will get back to you in case of any problems. Well ... I've tried it out on a switched Gbit network and managed to fully saturate the network cards ... on a celeron D 2.8 it pulled about 30% CPU. I would also recommend you maybe increase your ip_queue size to 32768 or something, just incase something else munches CPU and bwm is unable to keep up .... I'm also looking at renicing bwm to give it high priority aswell. -Nigel > > Thanks again. > > Regards > Ravi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:29 PM > To: ra...@sw... > Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration > > I wonder ... what would happen when a LARGE packet has been fragmented > by the sending side, then re-assembled on a Linux router? interesting > > I'm thinking this could be happening, this way the packets you get are > 1500 bytes, but being re-assembled into something massive ... which > overflows the small buffer used for reading from ipq. > > Changing IPQ_BUFSIZE will tell us if this is true > > > Ravi Patwari wrote: >> How do I check this. I have not made any specific change anywhere >> that I know of. >> >> -Ravi >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:23 PM >> To: ra...@sw... >> Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration >> >> Is it possible your packets are larger than 1500 bytes? >> >> -Nigel >> >> >> Ravi Patwari wrote: >>> Hi Nigel, >>> >>> Please help me on this problem with bwmd as it does not seem to be >>> handling packets from the QUEUE correctly. >>> >>> By the way I am using CentOS, which is redhat enterprise linux. >>> >>> Regards >>> Ravi >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] >>> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:05 PM >>> To: ra...@sw...; Bandwidth Management Tools General & >>> Technical Discussions >>> Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: >>>> ================================= >>>> BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems >>>> Design >>>> >>>> BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues >>>> BWMD: Found 1 modules to load >>>> Loading ip_queue...done >>>> IPQ runner started... >>>> Flow runner started... >>>> Stat thread started... >>>> Report runner started... >>>> Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated >>>> passer: Received message truncated >>>> >>>> ========================= >>>> >>> Can you try the latest development snapshot please. >>> >>> -Nigel >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-07-25 16:26:17
|
> Ok changed IPQ_BUFSIZE to 16384 and recompiled and it seems to be worki= ng > for the last 5 minutes without any errors. Will keep you posted. Cool .... only drawback is bwm will now eat ram like its going out of fashion ... not tooo bad though, I'll try address the problem in the next development release. >=20 > Please advise if you want me to do anything else on the box. >=20 > CPU usage is also around 1-3% only. Great ... >=20 > Thanks very much for your help. >=20 > What are the limitations of bwm? I will be playing around with the grap= hing > utilities and will get back to you in case of any problems. Well ... I've tried it out on a switched Gbit network and managed to fully saturate the network cards ... on a celeron D 2.8 it pulled about 30% CPU. I would also recommend you maybe increase your ip_queue size to 32768 or something, just incase something else munches CPU and bwm is unable to keep up .... I'm also looking at renicing bwm to give it high priority aswell. -Nigel >=20 > Thanks again. >=20 > Regards > Ravi=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:29 PM > To: ra...@sw... > Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration >=20 > I wonder ... what would happen when a LARGE packet has been fragmented = by > the sending side, then re-assembled on a Linux router? interesting >=20 > I'm thinking this could be happening, this way the packets you get are = 1500 > bytes, but being re-assembled into something massive ... which overflow= s the > small buffer used for reading from ipq. >=20 > Changing IPQ_BUFSIZE will tell us if this is true >=20 >=20 > Ravi Patwari wrote: >> How do I check this. I have not made any specific change anywhere that= =20 >> I know of. >> >> -Ravi >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:23 PM >> To: ra...@sw... >> Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration >> >> Is it possible your packets are larger than 1500 bytes? >> >> -Nigel >> >> >> Ravi Patwari wrote: >>> Hi Nigel, >>> >>> Please help me on this problem with bwmd as it does not seem to be=20 >>> handling packets from the QUEUE correctly. >>> >>> By the way I am using CentOS, which is redhat enterprise linux.=20 >>> >>> Regards >>> Ravi >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] >>> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:05 PM >>> To: ra...@sw...; Bandwidth Management Tools General &=20 >>> Technical Discussions >>> Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration >>> >>> >>>> =20 >>>> On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: >>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems=20 >>>> Design >>>> =20 >>>> BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues >>>> BWMD: Found 1 modules to load >>>> Loading ip_queue...done >>>> IPQ runner started... >>>> Flow runner started... >>>> Stat thread started... >>>> Report runner started... >>>> Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated >>>> passer: Received message truncated >>>> >>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D >>>> =20 >>> Can you try the latest development snapshot please. >>> >>> -Nigel >>> >>> >>> >> >> >=20 >=20 >=20 |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-25 07:45:30
|
Hi Kobe/Nigel Can you please help me on my problem. I am getting the below message continuously when I run bwmd in the foreground: Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated This basically means that bwmd is not getting the packet properly and the IP queue in the system keeps getting filled and when it reached 1024, it crashes. Seems a problem with bwmd. My system is a 3GHz processer with 1GB RAM and I do not see any load on the system whatsoever. Currently have configured 20 flows with 18 queues. Managing about 7 MBPS in each direction. I am using the latest development release of 8th march 2006. Please help. Regards Ravi -----Original Message----- From: bwm...@li... [mailto:bwm...@li...] On Behalf Of Kobe Lenjou Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 6:51 PM To: bwm...@li... Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration This would indicate that bwmd is too slow in handling all the pakets presented to it, or it simply stopped handling packets (due to a bug?) Is your hardware sufficent for the amount of packets you are trying to manage? How many packets/sec are you routing via bwmd? Greets Kobe > Hello > > Also suddenly bwmd stopped managing bandwidth and I got the following > error in /var/log/messages: > > Jul 24 17:21:38 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping > packet(s). > Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: printk: 1536 messages suppressed. > Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping > packet(s). > Jul 24 17:21:48 degw kernel: printk: 1508 messages suppressed. > > > How do we fix? Please advise. > > Regards > Ravi > ====================================================================== > = > > Hi Nigel, > > Thanks for your email. I have downloaded the latest development > snapshot from sourceforge, compiled and installed. Now the bwmd does > not exit but continues to give the following errors: > > BWM Daemon v200603080716 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems > Design > > BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues > BWMD: Found 1 modules to load > Loading ip_queue...done > IPQ runner started... > Flow runner started... > Stat thread started... > Report runner started... > Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to > get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: > Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received > message truncated > > Please advise. > > Regards > Ravi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:05 PM > To: ra...@sw...; Bandwidth Management Tools General & > Technical Discussions > Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration > > >> >> On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: >> ================================= >> BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems >> Design >> >> BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues >> BWMD: Found 1 modules to load >> Loading ip_queue...done >> IPQ runner started... >> Flow runner started... >> Stat thread started... >> Report runner started... >> Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated >> passer: Received message truncated >> >> ========================= >> > Can you try the latest development snapshot please. > > -Nigel > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and > earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEV > DEV _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ bwm-tools-tech mailing list bwm...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-24 13:48:48
|
Hello, When I start bwmd, I start getting the following errors: BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues BWMD: Found 1 modules to load Loading ip_queue...done IPQ runner started... Flow runner started... Stat thread started... Report runner started... Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated This continues for about 30-35 minutes and then I start getting the below: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping packets. The hardware is more than capable of handling the traffic. It has 1GB RAM and a 3.0 GHz processor. I am trying to manage about 7MBPS pipe. Please advise. Regards Ravi -----Original Message----- From: bwm...@li... [mailto:bwm...@li...] On Behalf Of Kobe Lenjou Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 6:51 PM To: bwm...@li... Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration This would indicate that bwmd is too slow in handling all the pakets presented to it, or it simply stopped handling packets (due to a bug?) Is your hardware sufficent for the amount of packets you are trying to manage? How many packets/sec are you routing via bwmd? Greets Kobe > Hello > > Also suddenly bwmd stopped managing bandwidth and I got the following > error in /var/log/messages: > > Jul 24 17:21:38 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping > packet(s). > Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: printk: 1536 messages suppressed. > Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping > packet(s). > Jul 24 17:21:48 degw kernel: printk: 1508 messages suppressed. > > > How do we fix? Please advise. > > Regards > Ravi > ====================================================================== > = > > Hi Nigel, > > Thanks for your email. I have downloaded the latest development > snapshot from sourceforge, compiled and installed. Now the bwmd does > not exit but continues to give the following errors: > > BWM Daemon v200603080716 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems > Design > > BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues > BWMD: Found 1 modules to load > Loading ip_queue...done > IPQ runner started... > Flow runner started... > Stat thread started... > Report runner started... > Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to > get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: > Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received > message truncated > > Please advise. > > Regards > Ravi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:05 PM > To: ra...@sw...; Bandwidth Management Tools General & > Technical Discussions > Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration > > >> >> On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: >> ================================= >> BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems >> Design >> >> BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues >> BWMD: Found 1 modules to load >> Loading ip_queue...done >> IPQ runner started... >> Flow runner started... >> Stat thread started... >> Report runner started... >> Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated >> passer: Received message truncated >> >> ========================= >> > Can you try the latest development snapshot please. > > -Nigel > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and > earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEV > DEV _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ bwm-tools-tech mailing list bwm...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech |
From: Kobe L. <ko...@le...> - 2006-07-24 13:21:14
|
This would indicate that bwmd is too slow in handling all the pakets presented to it, or it simply stopped handling packets (due to a bug?) Is your hardware sufficent for the amount of packets you are trying to manage? How many packets/sec are you routing via bwmd? Greets Kobe > Hello > > Also suddenly bwmd stopped managing bandwidth and I got the following > error > in /var/log/messages: > > Jul 24 17:21:38 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping > packet(s). > Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: printk: 1536 messages suppressed. > Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping > packet(s). > Jul 24 17:21:48 degw kernel: printk: 1508 messages suppressed. > > > How do we fix? Please advise. > > Regards > Ravi > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Hi Nigel, > > Thanks for your email. I have downloaded the latest development snapsho= t > from sourceforge, compiled and installed. Now the bwmd does not exit bu= t > continues to give the following errors: > > BWM Daemon v200603080716 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems > Design > > BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues > BWMD: Found 1 modules to load > Loading ip_queue...done > IPQ runner started... > Flow runner started... > Stat thread started... > Report runner started... > Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get > packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from I= PQ: > Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received mess= age > truncated > > Please advise. > > Regards > Ravi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:05 PM > To: ra...@sw...; Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technic= al > Discussions > Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration > > >> >> On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design >> >> BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues >> BWMD: Found 1 modules to load >> Loading ip_queue...done >> IPQ runner started... >> Flow runner started... >> Stat thread started... >> Report runner started... >> Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated >> passer: Received message truncated >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D >> > Can you try the latest development snapshot please. > > -Nigel > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-24 13:06:01
|
Hello Also suddenly bwmd stopped managing bandwidth and I got the following error in /var/log/messages: Jul 24 17:21:38 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping packet(s). Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: printk: 1536 messages suppressed. Jul 24 17:21:43 degw kernel: ip_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping packet(s). Jul 24 17:21:48 degw kernel: printk: 1508 messages suppressed. How do we fix? Please advise. Regards Ravi ======================================================================= Hi Nigel, Thanks for your email. I have downloaded the latest development snapshot from sourceforge, compiled and installed. Now the bwmd does not exit but continues to give the following errors: BWM Daemon v200603080716 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues BWMD: Found 1 modules to load Loading ip_queue...done IPQ runner started... Flow runner started... Stat thread started... Report runner started... Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated Please advise. Regards Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Kukard [mailto:nk...@lb...] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:05 PM To: ra...@sw...; Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technical Discussions Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Configuration > > On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: > ================================= > BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design > > BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues > BWMD: Found 1 modules to load > Loading ip_queue...done > IPQ runner started... > Flow runner started... > Stat thread started... > Report runner started... > Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated > passer: Received message truncated > > ========================= > Can you try the latest development snapshot please. -Nigel |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-07-24 09:36:10
|
> =20 > On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design > =20 > BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues > BWMD: Found 1 modules to load > Loading ip_queue...done > IPQ runner started... > Flow runner started... > Stat thread started... > Report runner started... > Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated > passer: Received message truncated > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > =20 Can you try the latest development snapshot please. -Nigel |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-24 09:31:54
|
Hello All, I have managed to successfully test bwm_tools in a test environment. TO move to the next steps I have configured the following xml file: <firewall> # Global configuration and access classes <global> <modules> <load name="ip_queue"/> </modules> <class name="out_trexnet1"> <address name="out_trexnet1_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.5/32" dst="! 61.59.42.5/32" /> <address name="out_trexnet1_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.5/32" dst="! 61.59.42.5/32" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet2"> <address name="out_trexnet2_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.16/29" dst="! 61.59.42.16/29" /> <address name="out_trexnet2_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.16/29" dst="! 61.59.42.16/29" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet3"> <address name="out_trexnet3_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.24/29" dst="! 61.59.42.24/29" /> <address name="out_trexnet3_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.24/29" dst="! 61.59.42.24/29" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet4"> <address name="out_trexnet4_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.32/27" dst="! 61.59.42.32/27" /> <address name="out_trexnet4_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.32/27" dst="! 61.59.42.32/27" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet5"> <address name="out_trexnet5_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.64/26" dst="! 61.59.42.64/26" /> <address name="out_trexnet5_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.64/26" dst="! 61.59.42.64/26" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet6"> <address name="out_trexnet6_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.192/29" dst="! 61.59.42.192/29" /> <address name="out_trexnet6_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.192/29" dst="! 61.59.42.192/29" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet7"> <address name="out_trexnet7_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.208/29" dst="! 61.59.42.208/29" /> <address name="out_trexnet7_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.208/29" dst="! 61.59.42.208/29" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet8"> <address name="out_trexnet8_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.224/28" dst="! 61.59.42.224/28" /> <address name="out_trexnet8_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.224/28" dst="! 61.59.42.224/28" /> </class> <class name="out_trexnet9"> <address name="out_trexnet9_tcp" src-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" src="61.59.42.240/29" dst="! 61.59.42.240/29" /> <address name="out_trexnet9_udp" src-iface="eth0" proto="udp" src="61.59.42.240/29" dst="! 61.59.42.240/29" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet1"> <address name="in_trexnet1_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.5/32" src="! 61.59.42.5/32" /> <address name="in_trexnet1_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.5/32" src="! 61.59.42.5/32" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet2"> <address name="in_trexnet2_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.16/29" src="! 61.59.42.16/29" /> <address name="in_trexnet2_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.16/29" src="! 61.59.42.16/29" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet3"> <address name="in_trexnet3_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.24/29" src="! 61.59.42.24/29" /> <address name="in_trexnet3_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.24/29" src="! 61.59.42.24/29" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet4"> <address name="in_trexnet4_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.32/27" src="! 61.59.42.32/27" /> <address name="in_trexnet4_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.32/27" src="! 61.59.42.32/27" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet5"> <address name="in_trexnet5_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.64/26" src="! 61.59.42.64/26" /> <address name="in_trexnet5_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.64/26" src="! 61.59.42.64/26" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet6"> <address name="in_trexnet6_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.192/29" src="! 61.59.42.192/29" /> <address name="in_trexnet6_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.192/29" src="! 61.59.42.192/29" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet7"> <address name="in_trexnet7_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.208/29" src="! 61.59.42.208/29" /> <address name="in_trexnet7_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.208/29" src="! 61.59.42.208/29" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet8"> <address name="in_trexnet8_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.224/28" src="! 61.59.42.224/28" /> <address name="in_trexnet8_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.224/28" src="! 61.59.42.224/28" /> </class> <class name="in_trexnet9"> <address name="in_trexnet9_tcp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="tcp" dst="61.59.42.240/29" src="! 61.59.42.240/29" /> <address name="in_trexnet9_udp" dst-iface="eth0" proto="udp" dst="61.59.42.240/29" src="! 61.59.42.240/29" /> </class> </global> # Access control lists # Network address translation # Traffic flows <traffic> # Rate can be specified in either IN, OUT or TOTAL (ratetotal) # If ratetotal == 0, no rate limits <flow name="out_trexnet" stats-len="5" queue-size="262144" queue-len="4000" max-rate="576000" report-timeout="60"> <flow name="out_trexnet1" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1001">out_trexnet1;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet2" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1002">out_trexnet2;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet3" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1003">out_trexnet3;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet4" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1004">out_trexnet4;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet5" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1005">out_trexnet5;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet6" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1006">out_trexnet6;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet7" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1007">out_trexnet7;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet8" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1008">out_trexnet8;</queue> </flow> <flow name="out_trexnet9" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1009">out_trexnet9;</queue> </flow> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet" stats-len="5" queue-size="262144" queue-len="4000" max-rate="576000" report-timeout="60"> <flow name="in_trexnet1" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1011">in_trexnet1;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet2" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1012">in_trexnet2;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet3" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1013">in_trexnet3;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet4" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1014">in_trexnet4;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet5" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1015">in_trexnet5;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet6" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1016">in_trexnet6;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet7" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1017">in_trexnet7;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet8" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1018">in_trexnet8;</queue> </flow> <flow name="in_trexnet9" max-rate="256000" burst-rate="576000" queue-size="16384" stats-len="5" report-timeout="60"> <queue prio="40" nfmark="1019">in_trexnet9;</queue> </flow> </flow> </traffic> </firewall> ===================== The above limits the whole input and output to 4.5MBPS approx. On running bwmd, I immediately get the following: ================================= BWM Daemon v0.2.3 - Copyright (c) 2003-2006 Linux Based Systems Design BWMD: Loaded 20 flows and 18 queues BWMD: Found 1 modules to load Loading ip_queue...done IPQ runner started... Flow runner started... Stat thread started... Report runner started... Failed to get packet from IPQ: Received message truncated passer: Received message truncated ========================= What could be the problem? Please advise if possible. Regards Ravi |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-20 09:23:43
|
Hi Rajveer Would it be possible for you to send me a copy of your iptables file as well as firewall.xml. YOu could all the IP addresses. YOur help will be highly appreciated as I seem to be getting nowhere. Regards Ravi _____ From: bwm...@li... [mailto:bwm...@li...] On Behalf Of Ravi Patwari Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:00 PM To: 'rajveer singh'; 'Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technical Discussions' Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration Hi Rajveer, I can now see that the packets are getting marked as per below iptables -L -nv -t mangle ------------- Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3478 packets, 532K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 1224 packets, 188K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 2254 packets, 344K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 1036 65825 MARK tcp -- * * 192.168.0.2 !192.168.0.0/24 MARK set 0x3e9 8 769 MARK udp -- * * 192.168.0.2 !192.168.0.0/24 MARK set 0x3e9 2235 341K MARK tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3f0 17 2626 MARK udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3f0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 1105 packets, 175K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3359 packets, 519K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination ------------- My iptables are as below: ------------ # Generated using BWM Firewall v0.2.3: Wed Jul 19 13:32:48 2006 *mangle :OUTPUT ACCEPT :INPUT ACCEPT :FORWARD ACCEPT -A FORWARD --destination ! 192.168.0.0/24 --source 192.168.0.2 --protocol tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1001 -A FORWARD --destination ! 192.168.0.0/24 --source 192.168.0.2 --protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1001 -A FORWARD --protocol tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1008 -A FORWARD --protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1008 COMMIT *filter :OUTPUT ACCEPT :bwmd - :INPUT ACCEPT :FORWARD ACCEPT -A bwmd -m mark ! --mark 0 -j QUEUE -A bwmd -j ACCEPT COMMIT ----------- iptables -L -nv is as below ----------- Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 1275 packets, 191K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 2272 packets, 350K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 1159 packets, 182K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain bwmd (0 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ------------- >From the below it is clear that the packets are getting marked but for some reason not getting forwarded to the bwmd chain. Please help if you can. Regards Ravi _____ From: bwm...@li... [mailto:bwm...@li...] On Behalf Of rajveer singh Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:56 AM To: bwm...@li... Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration hi ravi, It means simply none of the packet which is marking. simply use any client machine. which is accessing internet by using gateway ip of your machine on which you are configuring bwm-tools. but remember do'nt assgin ip address of your machine in proxy setting in web browser. then see whether if you are able to access internet or not. Regards Rajveer Singh On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote : >Hi Rajveer, > >Thanks for the quick reply. > >Actually I have removed the full iptables itself and only put the lines >which were created by bwm_firewall. > >In the iptables -L -n -v I see packet movement but I do not see any packet >movement in iptables -L -v -n -t mangle which should show the packets >getting marked and I guess that is why there is no bandwidth monitoring. > >Any ideas? > >Regards >Ravi > > _____ > > From: rajveer singh [mailto:raj...@re...] >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:16 AM >To: Ravi Patwari >Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration > > > > hi ravi > >try to see #iptables -Lnv >and see whether any traffic is showing or not. if you there is not any >packet movement is shown then surely there will be some problem with your >iptables rules or you may be using squid proxy which is not transparant. so >there is very simple way share your internet without squid by using iptables >rules. and then see traffic movement. if you get success. then try to >implement further transparent proxy or what u like. > >regards >rajveer singh > > >On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote : > >Hi All, > > > >I have been trying to install bwm_tools since the last one week and have > >been totally unsuccessful. > > > >Initially I had problems in installing but eventually was able to do it. > > > >The problem is in the config files. > > > >I already have iptables running and hence do not want to use the NAT and >ACL > >functions. I tried the most simple xml file with global and traffic > >sections, created the firewall file from the xml file, then pasted this > >output to iptables. I removed all the current iptables rules just to test. > > > >Then I restarted iptables, and then checked bwm_monitor but cannot see any > >traffic being monitored or shaped. > > > >Please advise urgently. > > > >I also saw in the archives that someone was working on a simpler step by > >step configuration manual last yesr. Please advise if the same is finished > >and where I can download it from. > > > >Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > >Regards > >Ravi > > <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signa ture-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3> |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-19 14:29:47
|
Hi Rajveer, I can now see that the packets are getting marked as per below iptables -L -nv -t mangle ------------- Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3478 packets, 532K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 1224 packets, 188K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 2254 packets, 344K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 1036 65825 MARK tcp -- * * 192.168.0.2 !192.168.0.0/24 MARK set 0x3e9 8 769 MARK udp -- * * 192.168.0.2 !192.168.0.0/24 MARK set 0x3e9 2235 341K MARK tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3f0 17 2626 MARK udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x3f0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 1105 packets, 175K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3359 packets, 519K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination ------------- My iptables are as below: ------------ # Generated using BWM Firewall v0.2.3: Wed Jul 19 13:32:48 2006 *mangle :OUTPUT ACCEPT :INPUT ACCEPT :FORWARD ACCEPT -A FORWARD --destination ! 192.168.0.0/24 --source 192.168.0.2 --protocol tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1001 -A FORWARD --destination ! 192.168.0.0/24 --source 192.168.0.2 --protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1001 -A FORWARD --protocol tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1008 -A FORWARD --protocol udp -j MARK --set-mark 1008 COMMIT *filter :OUTPUT ACCEPT :bwmd - :INPUT ACCEPT :FORWARD ACCEPT -A bwmd -m mark ! --mark 0 -j QUEUE -A bwmd -j ACCEPT COMMIT ----------- iptables -L -nv is as below ----------- Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 1275 packets, 191K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 2272 packets, 350K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 1159 packets, 182K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain bwmd (0 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 QUEUE all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ------------- >From the below it is clear that the packets are getting marked but for some reason not getting forwarded to the bwmd chain. Please help if you can. Regards Ravi _____ From: bwm...@li... [mailto:bwm...@li...] On Behalf Of rajveer singh Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:56 AM To: bwm...@li... Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration hi ravi, It means simply none of the packet which is marking. simply use any client machine. which is accessing internet by using gateway ip of your machine on which you are configuring bwm-tools. but remember do'nt assgin ip address of your machine in proxy setting in web browser. then see whether if you are able to access internet or not. Regards Rajveer Singh On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote : >Hi Rajveer, > >Thanks for the quick reply. > >Actually I have removed the full iptables itself and only put the lines >which were created by bwm_firewall. > >In the iptables -L -n -v I see packet movement but I do not see any packet >movement in iptables -L -v -n -t mangle which should show the packets >getting marked and I guess that is why there is no bandwidth monitoring. > >Any ideas? > >Regards >Ravi > > _____ > > From: rajveer singh [mailto:raj...@re...] >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:16 AM >To: Ravi Patwari >Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration > > > > hi ravi > >try to see #iptables -Lnv >and see whether any traffic is showing or not. if you there is not any >packet movement is shown then surely there will be some problem with your >iptables rules or you may be using squid proxy which is not transparant. so >there is very simple way share your internet without squid by using iptables >rules. and then see traffic movement. if you get success. then try to >implement further transparent proxy or what u like. > >regards >rajveer singh > > >On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote : > >Hi All, > > > >I have been trying to install bwm_tools since the last one week and have > >been totally unsuccessful. > > > >Initially I had problems in installing but eventually was able to do it. > > > >The problem is in the config files. > > > >I already have iptables running and hence do not want to use the NAT and >ACL > >functions. I tried the most simple xml file with global and traffic > >sections, created the firewall file from the xml file, then pasted this > >output to iptables. I removed all the current iptables rules just to test. > > > >Then I restarted iptables, and then checked bwm_monitor but cannot see any > >traffic being monitored or shaped. > > > >Please advise urgently. > > > >I also saw in the archives that someone was working on a simpler step by > >step configuration manual last yesr. Please advise if the same is finished > >and where I can download it from. > > > >Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > >Regards > >Ravi > > <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signa ture-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3> |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-19 08:04:06
|
Hi Rajveer Can you send me some of your firewall.xml files. I am not using a proxy server of any kind at the moment. Regards Ravi _____ From: bwm...@li... [mailto:bwm...@li...] On Behalf Of rajveer singh Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:56 AM To: bwm...@li... Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration hi ravi, It means simply none of the packet which is marking. simply use any client machine. which is accessing internet by using gateway ip of your machine on which you are configuring bwm-tools. but remember do'nt assgin ip address of your machine in proxy setting in web browser. then see whether if you are able to access internet or not. Regards Rajveer Singh On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote : >Hi Rajveer, > >Thanks for the quick reply. > >Actually I have removed the full iptables itself and only put the lines >which were created by bwm_firewall. > >In the iptables -L -n -v I see packet movement but I do not see any packet >movement in iptables -L -v -n -t mangle which should show the packets >getting marked and I guess that is why there is no bandwidth monitoring. > >Any ideas? > >Regards >Ravi > > _____ > > From: rajveer singh [mailto:raj...@re...] >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:16 AM >To: Ravi Patwari >Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm - configuration > > > > hi ravi > >try to see #iptables -Lnv >and see whether any traffic is showing or not. if you there is not any >packet movement is shown then surely there will be some problem with your >iptables rules or you may be using squid proxy which is not transparant. so >there is very simple way share your internet without squid by using iptables >rules. and then see traffic movement. if you get success. then try to >implement further transparent proxy or what u like. > >regards >rajveer singh > > >On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote : > >Hi All, > > > >I have been trying to install bwm_tools since the last one week and have > >been totally unsuccessful. > > > >Initially I had problems in installing but eventually was able to do it. > > > >The problem is in the config files. > > > >I already have iptables running and hence do not want to use the NAT and >ACL > >functions. I tried the most simple xml file with global and traffic > >sections, created the firewall file from the xml file, then pasted this > >output to iptables. I removed all the current iptables rules just to test. > > > >Then I restarted iptables, and then checked bwm_monitor but cannot see any > >traffic being monitored or shaped. > > > >Please advise urgently. > > > >I also saw in the archives that someone was working on a simpler step by > >step configuration manual last yesr. Please advise if the same is finished > >and where I can download it from. > > > >Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > >Regards > >Ravi > > <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signa ture-home.htm/1507191490@Middle5?PARTNER=3> |
From: rajveer s. <raj...@re...> - 2006-07-19 06:28:15
|
=0Ahi ravi,=0A=0A=0AIt means simply none of the packet which is marking.= =0A=0Asimply use any client machine. which is accessing internet by using g= ateway ip of your machine on which you are configuring bwm-tools. but remem= ber do'nt assgin ip address of your machine in proxy setting in web browser= . then see whether if you are able to access internet or not.=0A=0ARegards= =0A=0ARajveer Singh=0A=0AOn Wed, 19 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwari wrote :=0A>Hi Raj= veer,=0A>=0A>Thanks for the quick reply.=0A>=0A>Actually I have removed the= full iptables itself and only put the lines=0A>which were created by bwm_f= irewall.=0A>=0A>In the iptables -L -n -v I see packet movement but I do not= see any packet=0A>movement in iptables -L -v -n -t mangle which should sho= w the packets=0A>getting marked and I guess that is why there is no bandwid= th monitoring.=0A>=0A>Any ideas?=0A>=0A>Regards=0A>Ravi=0A>=0A> _____=0A>= =0A> From: rajveer singh [mailto:raj...@re...]=0A>Sent: W= ednesday, July 19, 2006 11:16 AM=0A>To: Ravi Patwari=0A>Subject: Re: [bwm-t= ools-tech] bwm - configuration=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> hi ravi=0A>=0A>try to see #= iptables -Lnv=0A>and see whether any traffic is showing or not. if you ther= e is not any=0A>packet movement is shown then surely there will be some pro= blem with your=0A>iptables rules or you may be using squid proxy which is n= ot transparant. so=0A>there is very simple way share your internet without = squid by using iptables=0A>rules. and then see traffic movement. if you get= success. then try to=0A>implement further transparent proxy or what u like= .=0A>=0A>regards=0A>rajveer singh=0A>=0A>=0A>On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 Ravi Patwa= ri wrote :=0A> >Hi All,=0A> >=0A> >I have been trying to install bwm_tools = since the last one week and have=0A> >been totally unsuccessful.=0A> >=0A> = >Initially I had problems in installing but eventually was able to do it.= =0A> >=0A> >The problem is in the config files.=0A> >=0A> >I already have i= ptables running and hence do not want to use the NAT and=0A>ACL=0A> >functi= ons. I tried the most simple xml file with global and traffic=0A> >sections= , created the firewall file from the xml file, then pasted this=0A> >output= to iptables. I removed all the current iptables rules just to test.=0A> >= =0A> >Then I restarted iptables, and then checked bwm_monitor but cannot se= e any=0A> >traffic being monitored or shaped.=0A> >=0A> >Please advise urge= ntly.=0A> >=0A> >I also saw in the archives that someone was working on a s= impler step by=0A> >step configuration manual last yesr. Please advise if t= he same is finished=0A> >and where I can download it from.=0A> >=0A> >Any h= elp will be highly appreciated.=0A> >=0A> >Regards=0A> >Ravi=0A> > |
From: Ravi P. <ra...@sw...> - 2006-07-18 11:09:27
|
Hi All, I have been trying to install bwm_tools since the last one week and have been totally unsuccessful. Initially I had problems in installing but eventually was able to do it. The problem is in the config files. I already have iptables running and hence do not want to use the NAT and ACL functions. I tried the most simple xml file with global and traffic sections, created the firewall file from the xml file, then pasted this output to iptables. I removed all the current iptables rules just to test. Then I restarted iptables, and then checked bwm_monitor but cannot see any traffic being monitored or shaped. Please advise urgently. I also saw in the archives that someone was working on a simpler step by step configuration manual last yesr. Please advise if the same is finished and where I can download it from. Any help will be highly appreciated. Regards Ravi |
From: Andrew N. <and...@gm...> - 2006-07-10 22:49:20
|
I have a couple of how do I type questions. I can't quite figure out how to make this happen or if it is even possible with bwm-tools. So any help is appreciated. How do I provide a guaranteed rate to some customers? How do I provide for a minimum rate? I want certain traffic classes to always have a minimum set amount of bandwidth available for them. Thanks _ /-\ ndrew |
From: Anyalewechi A. <dra...@gm...> - 2006-06-23 17:36:17
|
Hello, I never send out these things, but I thought you may want to see this website. Here, you can earn money while you make new friends. It's different. View it at http://www.palprofit.com/?66021 Cheers, Anyalewechi Amarachi dra...@gm... --------------------------------------------------- UNSUBSCRIBE If you don't want to recieve any further invitations for PalProfit.com Go to http://www.palprofit.com/unsubscribe.php?em=bwm...@li... |
From: George L O. <glo...@ke...> - 2006-06-21 06:32:15
|
Sorry, Maybe I should have refreshed my question. What I was asking is whether anybody had come up with a graphical configuration tool for the bwm-tools. Thanks, George ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nigel Kukard" <nk...@lb...> To: "George L Otieno" <glo...@ke...>; "Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technical Discussions" <bwm...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm-tool Graphical config Feature > Hi, > >> Has anybody managed to get the graphical configuration feature of the >> bwm-tools working? >> > > Are you referring to the curses interface? > > Regards > Nigel > > > > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-06-20 13:48:22
|
Hi, > Has anybody managed to get the graphical configuration feature of the > bwm-tools working? > Are you referring to the curses interface? Regards Nigel |
From: Rizwan S. <ra...@ya...> - 2006-06-16 19:35:24
|
is there a graphical configuration available ? i thought you had to write a config file..... And even the documentation not updated yet, last time when i used it a year ago, the author promised to release some sort of detailed step by step configuration guide but nothing yet. i guess nigel is still busy. bwm...@li... wrote: > Send bwm-tools-tech mailing list submissions to > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > > You can reach the person managing the list at > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of bwm-tools-tech digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. bwm-tool Graphical config Feature (George L Otieno) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:24:13 +0300 > From: "George L Otieno" <glo...@ke... </ym/Compose?To=glo...@ke...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>> > Subject: [bwm-tools-tech] bwm-tool Graphical config Feature > To: "Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technical Discussions" > <bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>> > Cc: <bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>>, > <bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>> > Message-ID: <004601c690fc$b90d1b00$486096d5@Ltkenyaweb> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi All, > > Has anybody managed to get the graphical configuration feature of the > bwm-tools working? > > Thanks, > > George > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Shannan Summers > To: Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technical Discussions > Cc: bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> ; > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:36 AM > Subject: Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Feature > > > > THe problem with the seg faulting was removed by blowing away the > whole machine and starting again :) lucky it was the only thing on it. > > Shannan Summers > Network Administrator > > > Cellnet Group Limited > 59-61 Qantas Drive Eagle Farm, Queensland 4009 > t 1300 CELLNET f 1800 CELLNET > d 07 3853 5437 m 0422 148 882 > e sha...@ce... </ym/Compose?To=sha...@ce...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> www.cellnet.com.au > > > Nigel Kukard <nk...@lb... </ym/Compose?To=nk...@lb...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>> > Sent by: bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > 30/05/2006 04:32 PM Please respond to > Bandwidth Management Tools General & Technical > Discussions <bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>> > > > To bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > cc > Subject Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Feature > > > > > > > > Hi Shannan, > > > I have been researching similar products to find alternatives, so i > > can convince my CIO that the running BWM box i have will do > everything > > they want it to. > > Great ... are you still having problems with the segfaulting? Sorry I > didn't get back to you, had a bit of a crisis in one of our > datacenters > and had to get it sorted out. > > > > He is very keen on getting a Packeteer hardware appliance. The only > > thing it does that BWM-Tools doesn't mention is a feature called > link > > acceleration. > > This appears to be clever packet mangling/tinkering. Packeteer looks > like it plays with the packets and adjusts them on the fly to get > better > throughput. Its something I've been thinking about but haven't had > the > time to mess around with. > > > > > > Is this possible or is it included and just called something > > different? > > At present BWM Tools doesn't mangle anything inside packets. > > > > > Also there are staff here that will need to modify the config but > have > > no xml or linux experience. Is there a web GUI available? > > No gui available as part of the official bwm tools package, I'm not > sure > if anyone has developed one though? > > The XML layout is pretty easy and shouldn't be hard to write a web > GUI. > > > > If not that's ok we have in house web developers that could do one > up > > (and i could release to the BWM community) that could do the job. I > > just thought i would check before we re-invented the wheel. > > This would be GREAT! > > > Regards > Nigel > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Disclaimer: > The information in this electronic mail message is confidential and > may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. > Access to this Internet electronic mail message by anyone else is > unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it > is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > mistake please call the sender immediately on 07 3853 5555 and erase > the original message and any attachments. The Company accepts no > responsibility for any effects this email message or attachments has on the > recipient network or computer system. > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=bwm-tools-tech/attachments/20060616/2184461f/attachment.html > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: image/jpeg > Size: 2032 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=bwm-tools-tech/attachments/20060616/2184461f/attachment.jpe > > ------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > bwm-tools-tech mailing list > bwm...@li... </ym/Compose?To=bwm...@li...&YY=55406&order=down&sort=date&pos=0> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech > > > End of bwm-tools-tech Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1 > ******************************************** |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-30 06:48:42
|
Hi Shannan, > THe problem with the seg faulting was removed by blowing away the > whole machine and starting again :) lucky it was the only thing on it. Interesting :o) -Nigel |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-30 06:33:07
|
Hi Shannan, > I have been researching similar products to find alternatives, so i > can convince my CIO that the running BWM box i have will do everything > they want it to.=20 Great ... are you still having problems with the segfaulting? Sorry I didn't get back to you, had a bit of a crisis in one of our datacenters and had to get it sorted out. > He is very keen on getting a Packeteer hardware appliance. The only > thing it does that BWM-Tools doesn't mention is a feature called link > acceleration.=20 This appears to be clever packet mangling/tinkering. Packeteer looks like it plays with the packets and adjusts them on the fly to get better throughput. Its something I've been thinking about but haven't had the time to mess around with. >=20 > Is this possible or is it included and just called something > different?=20 At present BWM Tools doesn't mangle anything inside packets. >=20 > Also there are staff here that will need to modify the config but have > no xml or linux experience. Is there a web GUI available? No gui available as part of the official bwm tools package, I'm not sure if anyone has developed one though? The XML layout is pretty easy and shouldn't be hard to write a web GUI. > If not that's ok we have in house web developers that could do one up > (and i could release to the BWM community) that could do the job. I > just thought i would check before we re-invented the wheel.=20 This would be GREAT! Regards Nigel |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-26 18:34:19
|
Hi Mark, > Just wanted to know if bwm could work on IPCOP, or could be made to=20 > work with it. (kinda new to linux) BWM Tools uses IPTables/Netfilter and -j QUEUE, if IPCOP uses the IPTables/Netfilter you could probably make them work together. I'm not familiar with IPCOP, so I can't tell you for sure. -Nigel |
From: Mark D. <ma...@du...> - 2006-05-26 09:18:48
|
Just wanted to know if bwm could work on IPCOP, or could be made to work with it. (kinda new to linux) Thank you. |
From: Nigel K. <nk...@lb...> - 2006-05-09 06:09:29
|
Hi, > The version of RRDTool is 1.2.11 =20 >=20 > I do not use any options in configure =20 You need to use --with-rrdtool2 as a configure option. Check the README file included in the top directory of the source. -Nigel |
From: John B. <jo...@mu...> - 2006-05-08 17:06:40
|
The version of RRDTool is 1.2.11 I do not use any options in configure When I run the make command it creates sub directories under bwm_tools-200603080716 I have entered in those directories i.e bwm_firewall bwm_graph bwm_monitor bwmd and ran MAKE and MAKE INSTALL command under those diretories. This way I have managed to install the BWM utilities except bwm_graph Is that procedure in order? Then we should try to install the bwm_graph Otherwise, I am currently trying ti create my fierwall.xml John Bii > Hi John, > > 1. Which version of RRDTool are you building against? > > 2. What configure options are you using? > > > Regards > Nigel > > John Bii wrote: > > >Hello > > > >I am trying to install BWM Tools on SUSE linux 10 > > > >The problem is it does not install all the BWM tools Utilities. It only > > > >install bwm_firewall. It does not install bwmd, bwm_monitor and bwm_graph > > > >The problem starts with MAKE command which produces the output below. Whatis > > > >the problem and how do I go about it? HELP > > > > > > > >Regards > > > >John Bii > > > >Moi University > > > > > > > >LRClinux:~/bwm_tools-200603080716 # make > > > >make all-recursive > > > >make[1]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >Making all in lib > > > >make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/lib' > > > >make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > > > >make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/lib' > > > >Making all in bwm_firewall > > > >make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_firewall' > > > >make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > > > >make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_firewall' > > > >Making all in bwm_graph > > > >make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph' > > > >make[3]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -pthread > > > >-I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome/lib/glib-2.0/include > > > >-DLOG_DIR=\"/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0 -g -O2 -MT bwm_graph-graph.o -MD > > > >-MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c' > > > >|| echo './'`graph.c; \ > > > >then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; else rm -f > > > >".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > > > >graph.c: In function ‘writeGraphs’: > > > >graph.c:637: error: too few arguments to function ‘rrd_graph’ > > > >make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1 > > > >make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph' > > > >make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > > >make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716' > > > >make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > >LRClinux:~/bwm_tools-200603080716 # > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Nigel Kukard, PhD CompSc > Linux Based Systems Design > > > The best language to use is the language that was designed for > what you want to use it for. > > > > -- John Bii School of Medicine Moi University |