[Burp-users] Re : Burp 2
Brought to you by:
grke
|
From: <zi...@zi...> - 2017-03-16 09:18:09
|
Hi,<br><br>Burp 2 is now the latest stable release for a couple of months so you can safely use it.<br><br>You have to note though that only the protocol 2 is under heavy development and should be avoided in production. The protocol 1 (which is the default) is quite stable (probably more than burp 1 itself).<br><br><div class="quote" style="line-height: 1.5"><br><br>-------- Message original --------<br>Objet : [Burp-users] Burp 2<br>De : Frans Coomans <coo...@gm...><br>À : bur...@li...<br>Cc : <br><br><br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi. We are still using Burp 1.x and loving it. <div><br></div><div>I see you list the current stable version as 2.0.54.<div><br></div><div>I am thinking of upgrading from 1.x to 2.x. On <a href="http://burp.grke.org/burp2.html">http://burp.grke.org/burp2.html</a>, you say that Burp 2 should be used with extreme caution and backups done with Burp 2 might not work with future releases.</div><div>Is this page purely outdated or is this still true? </div><div><br></div><div>On that page you also recommend using Burp 2 in Burp 1 mode. Is this still valid or is it safe to use Burp 2 as Burp 2?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Frans</div></div></div> </blockquote></div> |