Re: Fwd: [btqueue-users] documentation?

[Stingray <sti...@gm...>]

yes cvs is supposed to be runable/useable but there might be bugs in
it (that u should tell the developers about)

so they can fix it, also i recomend the 0.18 cvs imho just cause it
seems to work so much better then before, when i got wierd python
error msg:es all the time
(0.17 & 0.16) 0.15 doesnt have the remote & daemon thingy...

also the idea of cvs is u got versions of all files, so if something
is f*cked up, u can go back to a earlier version..

atleast thats how i understood it.. :)


On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:36:42 +0100, Meikel <le...@gm...> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:52:55 +0100
> Stingray <sti...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> > i got .18 and xgie has fixed the incompatibality with python 2.3
> > xmlrpc (the daemon/remote problem)
> 
> I got the same problem wit 0.17 so I went down to 0.15.
> 
> I really like btqueue.
> 
> One question:
> 
> Is the CVS supposed to be "runnable" at all times? So if there new
> checkins everyone who likes testing could do a checkout? I know CVS
> isn't meant to be stable and there could be problems.
> 
> Greetings,
> Meikel
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
> FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
> robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
> for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
> _______________________________________________
> btqueue-users mailing list
> btq...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/btqueue-users
>