Re: [Bodington-developers] Java 1.5

[Andrew B. <a.g...@le...>]

I'd be in favour of move to 1.5.

++2

Aggie

____________________________________________
Andrew G Booth
Professor of Online Learning
Institute of Life Sciences Education
Faculty of Biological Sciences
Garstang Building
University of Leeds
Leeds LS2 9JT
U.K.
Tel: +44-113-343-3142=20
____________________________________________

No Education Patents
Boycott Blackboard
http://www.noedupatents.org/
____________________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: bod...@li...
[mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of
Peter Crowther
Sent: 17 January 2007 11:14
To: Bodington developers
Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Java 1.5

> From: Adam Marshall
> I'll weigh in with a +1.66666 (recurring).

And being a Rationalist, I'll therefore update our score to +17/3.

> Think of the benefits of using
> generics - no more ClassCastException woes! Enumerated types=20
> here we come.

... once you actually refactor the existing codebase, of course - not a
small job.

> I guess we should wait for Aggie & Leeds to comment though

Definitely.

		- Peter

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share =
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bodington-developers mailing list
Bod...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers