From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2006-11-14 14:28:37
|
I think there is a difference between the Windows 2003 Server CALs and = the SQL Server CALs. If you are running Bodington under IIS/SQL Server, = then only those who log into the box need CALs. The SQL Server has a = separate set of CALs. Aggie -----Original Message----- From: bod...@li... [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of Matthew Buckett Sent: 14 November 2006 13:58 To: Bodington developers Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Windows 2003 CALs (was IE 7 issues) Peter Crowther wrote: > * Bodington running on Windows 2000 Server *does not* require Windows > CALs for every user; Bodington running on Windows 2003 Server *does*. = A > subtle but expensive change for anyone running a non-Microsoft > application that performs authentication. More info about CALs for people who didn't know (like me). http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/howtobuy/licensing/caloverview= .ms px Aren't Mircosoft shooting themselves in the foot a little with this one (assuming people abide by it)? As it seems that this will effect any authenticated web application. Or are CALs acceptably cheap? --=20 -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Bodington-developers mailing list Bod...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |