From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2006-11-14 13:52:22
|
> From: Sean Mehan > if the sw isn't supported by the company, why not just demand it be =20 > dropped! Because the client still uses it and sees no reason to change. I still reasonably regularly come across desktops on Windows 98 (no longer supported at all), Windows 2000 (on extended support) and the odd server on NT4 (no longer supported). I *run* a couple of Win2K servers, not least because of the less onerous licensing terms*. Demanding works if we're larger than the company of which we're making the demands, but we're a small company and end up politely suggesting instead. - Peter * Bodington running on Windows 2000 Server *does not* require Windows CALs for every user; Bodington running on Windows 2003 Server *does*. A subtle but expensive change for anyone running a non-Microsoft application that performs authentication. |