Re: [Bodington-developers] Multiple Xalan.jars inBodington repository

[Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...>]

violence? moi? why don't you migrate to maven and specify the dependencie=
s
that way? gx jars would then sit in the bod repository and you could buil=
d
a bod release without or without gx using maven targets.

How long will it take you to migrate to maven btw?

--=20
Alistair Young
Senior Software Engineer
UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig
Isle of Skye
Scotland

> Alexis O'Connor wrote:
>> Alistair Young wrote:
>>> Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan
>>> though as it'll use xmlbeans.
>>>
>>> I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on
>>> binning
>>> xalan in gx anyway.
>>>
>>
>> In the interests of maintaining treating the guanxi.war as a "black bo=
x"
>> within
>> the bodington repository, I was going to add a 1-line excludes for the
>> xalan.jar
>>   coming from the guanxi.war. (Incidentally, in the future /when/ it
>> disapears,
>> you *don't* get an error for excluding a non-existent file).
>>
>> Anyone have any violent objections to me doing that?
>>
>> Alexis
>>
>
> Ahem, I'm talking about within the build.xml of course ;-).
>
> Alexis
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit=
y?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron=
imo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Bodington-developers mailing list
> Bod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers
>