Re: [Bodington-developers] Deleting branch on SF

[Sean M. <se...@sm...>]

OK, OK, i'm back in the building.

sorry, chaps.

now, the branch tag *should* be 2_8

version tags for milestones should then follow as 2_8_minor

2_9 is the development tag for the present dev cycle.

I will fix this now. Colin, if you like, phone and give me abuse.

sean
01471 888 342


On 12 Sep 2006, at 14:47, Alexis O'Connor wrote:

> Colin Tatham wrote:
>> Alexis O'Connor wrote:
>>> I'm not quite sure what our policy is regarding tagging the root  
>>> of a branch!
>>
>> I'm not sure either. Sean might have intended the bodington_2_9_0  
>> tag to also represent the root of
>> the 2_8 branch, but I think it's clearer with an additional tag.
>>
>> I don't have a problem with the 'Root_branch_2_8' tag name  
>> (although it is a bit ugly). Isn't what
>> it represents more obvious than 'bodington_2_8_0'?
>>
>
> I don't have a problem with 'Root_branch_2_8' in particular. It's just
> inconsistent with what has gone before, whatever that is / was ;-).
>
> Alexis
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,  
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your  
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache  
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Bodington-developers mailing list
> Bod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers
>