From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@ou...> - 2006-09-12 13:46:11
|
Colin Tatham wrote: > Alexis O'Connor wrote: >> I'm not quite sure what our policy is regarding tagging the root of a branch! > > I'm not sure either. Sean might have intended the bodington_2_9_0 tag to also represent the root of > the 2_8 branch, but I think it's clearer with an additional tag. > > I don't have a problem with the 'Root_branch_2_8' tag name (although it is a bit ugly). Isn't what > it represents more obvious than 'bodington_2_8_0'? > I don't have a problem with 'Root_branch_2_8' in particular. It's just inconsistent with what has gone before, whatever that is / was ;-). Alexis |