From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2006-07-19 16:13:41
|
> From: Jon Maber > if you resolve a host name it doesn't take any longer=20 > to get all the IP numbers - a single response packet lists=20 > them all. (In=20 > fact a suspect that the same call is made and that the Java=20 > method that fetches one IP number just discards the others.) Memory says you're right, and that a DNS client RFC-SHOULD contact the addresses in order - so the call that returns a single address should return the first one. However, I'm doing this from memory without the spec in front of me. > I don't think that the=20 > Leeds DNS is clever enough to change the order of the IP=20 > numbers so I've=20 > implemented a cycle in the authenticator that balances the load. Makes sense. I assume you also refuse to contact failed servers for a period after detecting the failure? - Peter |