From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2006-07-06 09:26:03
|
> From: Adam Marshall > And I understood the current licence to be derived from=20 > Apache (1/2?) not MIT. It's far too small to be Apache 2. If we have a better idea of the derivation, great and let's point that out - I was matching to the obvious candidates, not knowing the history. - Peter |