From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-06-29 16:53:11
|
This needs to be written up somewhere (wiki, readme.txt in sp dir on code) that this is a feature/limitation of 2.8 implementation so that anyone pulling it down can figure out what is happening. Atif, do you want to take a stab at writing it up on the wiki? thanks, s On 29 Jun 2006, at 17:49, Atif Suleman wrote: >> >> >>> The single url protection does have drawbacks............. >>> >>> >> >> Apart from having to have the user select the authentication mode, >> any >> >> others? >> > In my original design I wanted to use the single url protection > approach > but the users at leeds bio department did not want to have the > burden of > selecting the authentication mode. To meet the leeds bio department > requirement I implemented the entire bodington protection method. O:-) > > Thanks for the feedback. > > Ta > Atif. > > p.s. do you have a spare room up at Oxford where I lock up bio > department users??? > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |