|
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2006-06-07 13:33:39
|
sounds good Matthew. Will chew over the namespaces. Of course, my lovely i18n system will go in the bin! as we'll use fmt: (jstl?) but that's open source for you. My bin is fuller than my portfolio these days. Maybe my bin is trying to tell me something... --=20 Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig Isle of Skye Scotland > Alistair Young wrote: >> Matthew, what's your feeling on this? Should we keep the template >> resources separate and have mutltiple MessageSources in the config fil= e >> or, as we migrate each template to JSP, migrate it's strings to a glob= al >> bod MessageSource file? > > If anyone hasn't looked at the spring stuff I just have one > messagesource at the moment that is used for both JSP and Java i18n. > > I think having a global message source is good as some strings will sho= w > up in more than one page/class. > > I think having one per JSP/class leads to too many files, maybe one per > resource type (one for questionnaire, one for mcq). > > Important thing is how we divide up the namespace for the key values. > Should we prefix all keys with the resource type and use default for th= e > global ones? > >> Global file would be easier to send to a translator and would keep the >> config file clean. > > If we keep the namespace clean it should be easy to join/split i18n > files for sending to people. > > -- > -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer > -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services > -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |