Re: [Bodington-developers] update on marie and some ideas for discussion

[Adam M. <ada...@co...>]

Hope Marie is feeling better now.

Yes we really missed your input too, both in the look and feel debate and
the way forward (tetra).

adam

| -----Original Message-----
| From: bod...@li...
| [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of
| Selwyn Lloyd
| Sent: 02 June 2006 12:02
| To: bod...@li...
| Subject: [Bodington-developers] update on marie and some ideas for
| discussion
| 
| Hi all,
| 
| 
| Marie couldn't even walk on her own by the time I got home yesterday,
| managed to get her to the docs, and she is recovering, tests have been
| done thats all we know, severe flu like symptoms.
| 
| 
| I am really miffed to miss the various discussions, particularly about
| Tetra concepts.
| We have looked at integrating with Bod and Sakai in the past and think
| that other than major hacks and lots of pain we really need to start
| discussing an open common architecture.
| 
|  From our perspective we like a number of ideas / themes wrt to
| plugability and interoperability and often discuss the potential of...
| 
| 1. common portlets, common web services type architecture
|  - to achieve real reuseability either the portlets and web services
| need to be self contained in terms of their config data and active data
| else see below
| 
| 2. common schema, common libraries such as reuseable war and jar files.
|  - a common database schema across e-learning seems far fetched, but
| across bodington, sakai, ioportal perhaps its possible to agree on at
| least a hibernate mapping. i.e. a common database abstraction layer.
| 
| Just a couple of ideas to throw into the pot today.
| 
| cheers
| 
| Sel
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| Bodington-developers mailing list
| Bod...@li...
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers