From: Selwyn L. <sel...@ph...> - 2006-05-05 08:53:45
|
We usually would do things on a price basis, and sometimes claim travel expenses, so its not normally a question of rates. Price work is basically a set amount for a particular work package which is agreed up front. I would suggest that open source outputs are more attractive from freelancers / small companies like ours as they can be made available to the community. Also the team get a buzz from working on stuff for the community and getting paid, which I guess is the same as being paid to do this kind of thing by your college/uni, we also have two legs, two arms, single head etc :) Adam Marshall wrote: >Bodington would certainly like to be able to include Sakai tools, so yes, >that does sound interesting. > >Was it your intention to use IMS TI as a framework? > >>From what Selwyn has said in the past, I think commercial developers are >fine so long as there is some institutional backing. Ie, I don't think >they'd get too far on their own unless they were sort of 'commissioned' by >an institution, but if they're a prt of a project proposal then rt=that's >fine. Its possible that JISC may quibble about their rates but in practise >this has never happened to us. > >adam > >| -----Original Message----- >| From: bod...@li... [mailto:bodington- >| dev...@li...] On Behalf Of John Norman >| Sent: 04 May 2006 19:00 >| To: bod...@li... >| Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] tetra & IMS TI >| >| OK I got several expressions of interest, so I'll share the model I >| have in mind. If you have better ideas just say so, I'm not wedded to >| any of this: >| >| I was thinking a 12 - 18 month project with a series of design >| workshops of 1 - 3 days during the first 3 - 6 months (say 3 >| workshops) with breaks for reflection and concept testing, followed >| by 6 months with prototyping of key ideas (maybe 1 or 2 workshops as >| we go along) and then 6 months of creating a prototype with >| implementations of key Bodington and Sakai Tools (plus possibly some >| LAMS). >| >| Does this make sense? If we aimed to fund about half a dozen >| developers in total (plus some project management) at an average of >| 0.2 FTE in the first phase, 0.5 FTE in the second phase and then >| perhaps 3 or 4 at Full Time in the last phase, that would probably go >| over budget. I'll wait for a reaction to the general idea before >| sharpening the pencil on costs - you may have imagined something >| completely different... >| >| John >| >| I'm not aware of a reason why commercial developers cannot be >| involved, but I haven't scoured the small print yet. >| >| On 4 May 2006, at 17:08, John Norman wrote: >| >| > Would there be any interest in a JISC capital eLearning bid to >| > collectively work on concepts for Tetra? >| > >| > Sakai has a bit more to offer now that the skeleton framework is >| > available (Sakai Mini) and 2.2 should offer significant code clean- >| > up to make development easier. >| > >| > Cambridge is particularly keen on exchanging Tools in IMS TI with >| > Bodington sites as well. >| > >| > John >| > >| > On 4 May 2006, at 15:28, Adam Marshall wrote: >| > >| >> IMS Tools Interop. standard is finally out (a couple of months ago >| >> actually). >| >> >| >> I haint looked myself, but we really should investigate as it is >| >> probably of >| >> importance to tetra. >| >> >| >> It struck me that Brian appears to actually like reading horrendously >| >> complex techie books so maybe he'd like to do the honours with IMS >| >> TI! >| >> >| >> http://www.imsglobal.org/ti/tiv1p0/imsti_guidev1p0.html >| >> >| >> By the way, what ever happened to tetra? >| >> >| >> adam >| >> >| >> >| >> >| >> ------------------------------------------------------- >| >> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >| >> security? >| >> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >| >> job easier >| >> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >| >> Geronimo >| >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >| >> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >| >> _______________________________________________ >| >> Bodington-developers mailing list >| >> Bod...@li... >| >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >| > >| > >| > >| > ------------------------------------------------------- >| > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >| > security? >| > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >| > job easier >| > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >| > Geronimo >| > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >| > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >| > _______________________________________________ >| > Bodington-developers mailing list >| > Bod...@li... >| > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >| >| >| >| ------------------------------------------------------- >| Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >| Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >| easier >| Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >| http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >| _______________________________________________ >| Bodington-developers mailing list >| Bod...@li... >| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Bodington-developers mailing list >Bod...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > > > |