From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-03-28 14:13:50
|
Greetings from flooding Southern California! Aggie, all sounds +. If the peer marker is contained, then I would think = a commit to head would allow for testing and we could see what it does and how well. It could always roll back, non? I think that Matthew has some strong points here about the MySQL stuff. Surely it would be better to generalize and work from the *one* schema! -s <quote who=3D"Matthew Buckett"> > Andrew Booth wrote: >> I have committed MySQL support to HEAD (documentation in docs). > > I still feel that having a different database schema for different > database products is making a rod for our own backs and changing the > tables to: > fields -> map_fields > objects -> map_objects > classes -> map_classes > > (or other) would be a better soloution in the long run. > >> Can I have an opinion about committing the peer-marker tool? > > I liked the tool. Do you have a patch available to look at? Does it > change anything outside the new tool? > >> Also, I have converted the MCQ tool to the new templates and localised >> the >> text, both template and in-code. Shall I commit it? > > Did you remove the <building> tags or just convert the page to <xml>? > > -- > -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer > -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services > -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > --=20 Sean Mehan Head of e-Frameworks Learning and Information Services UHI |