From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-03-23 14:22:43
|
Alistair Young wrote: >> Comments > > pretty impressive work Matthew but I'll bet you'd rather design it from > the ground up. It's not that much work. The main thing was getting the mapping from Facilities/Resources to another framework going. But this isn't quite sorted. Initially I wanted to move most of the work of BuildingServlet into a filter and then use the servlet mappings to decide which servlet to map the request to but the servlet spec isn't flexible enough so the mapping has to be done in BuildingServer and then dispatched. > I can see why My Modules can't go in to 2.8! I'm not suggesting this should go in either. I'd just been mentioning this stuff and though I should expand on it. > Is it worth building on what Matthew has done to start designing bod as > a modern application? If we throw it out that's fine, but I think we need to seriously think about this stuff. I've being working on it as I worked on MyWeblearn with the hope of ironing out bugs in it. > We need functionality now but we can't get it cleanly - we can either > keep cobbling it together with Facility but maybe it's time we stood > back, took stock and decided what we really want out of bod. I've been cobbling for a year and have had enough. > Maybe we need a summit, all devs, consultants and interested parties. hmmm... beer.... -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |