From: M T. <m....@gm...> - 2006-03-03 13:24:40
|
Hello everyone, Hope you are all well. Could I get your opinion(s) on a piece of functionality that Melandra are working on for Leeds. I've copied the original text from the Library docs, see below: Library's current questionnaire work package Objective : Provide a mechanism to monitor completion of module feedback questionnaires without infringing anonymous submission. Overview Allow a deadline to be set after which the owner can view a standard HTML list of all the students that have access to the questionnaire who have not completed it. This list will not be displayed if less than 50% of the students who have record access have not completed it. _________ I understand why this functionality has been requested, but in it's current state I feel that it will not work particularly well. I believe the rules, that determine when the function is enabled are to simplistic (see Overview). This could allow tutors to infringe on the anonymous submission. I have discussed some possible solutions with Peter Crowther, but I'd appreciate your ideas on the issue. -- m.cha3l |