Re: [Bodington-developers] Change in move and copy

[Antony C. <an...@sm...>]

Yep people could specify the port/ssl in which case it would be more 
robust. Is BodingtonURL in /util - don't have latest HEAD yet? If so, 
it would make sense to reuse that code.

Well spotted, I vote yes!

On 26 Jul 2005, at 16:19, Matthew Buckett wrote:

> I noticed that in the new UHI L&F now the move and copy functionality 
> now requires the full URL. Eg rather than:
>
> /admin/example
>
> you need to enter:
>
> http://full.server.name/bodington/site/example
>
> Although I prefer this (makes copy and paste easier). Could we have a 
> bit of a heads up about changes like this as it is more than just 
> changing the look and feel.
>
> Now if I try this on my test server with move, giving the URL:
>
> https://localhost:8443/bodington_head/site/test/
>
> it fails to find the resource I am wanting to move.
>
> I have a fix for this that involves using BodingtonURL (Antony's class 
> for QuickLink) to do the parsing of the pasted URL which is much more 
> forgiving than the code in copyconfirm/moveconfirm (Facility.java). Is 
> it ok to commit this stuff back?
>
> -- 
> +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+
> | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group               |
> | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/       |
> +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Bodington-developers mailing list
> Bod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers