Re: [Bodington-developers] sql - versions?

[Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...>]

> still accepting more stuff into HEAD
so I'll work the other way as it's an upgrade path, so it seems  
logical to do:
2_1_1_stable2 -> 2_4
2_4 -> 2_6

I'll ignore the rc "releases".

Alistair


On 25 Jul 2005, at 10:23, Matthew Buckett wrote:

> Alistair Young wrote:
>
>> I'm about to try to find out the schema diffs for upgrades - what   
>> version should I start with and go where?
>> 2_1_1_stable2? -> ? -> ?
>>
>
> I would be incline to work the other way and see how it goes.
>
> 2.4 -> Current Build of HEAD (2.6).
> 2.1.0rc4 -> 2.4
> 2.1.1s2 -> 2.1.0rc4?
>
> If we are still accepting more stuff into HEAD then the end schema  
> for 2.6 may well change.
>
> -- 
> +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+
> | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group               |
> | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/       |
> +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Bodington-developers mailing list
> Bod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers
>