From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2005-07-21 10:19:59
|
except that it will take some time to disentangle some of the extra features, e.g. gx, that you wouldn't want in a quickstart, as well as, would it not be better to have a real 2.6.0 as the quickstart? if any of these are true, then surely it is better to build the quickstart in a week rather than a couple of days to maximize what can be put into it? s On 21 Jul 2005, at 10:58, Matthew Buckett wrote: > Sean Mehan wrote: > >> We are here (methinks)! >> 1. HSQLDB - estimated 3 days - MB This is a must, as we have sold >> a lot of snake oil on this one! >> > > At the moment HSQLDB and quickstart are tied together so I will > probably push the two changes across at the same time. > > >> post: Quickstart >> > > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |