Re: [Bodington-developers] I18N properties

[Colin T. <col...@co...>]

 > Could
 > we change the i18n properties

I vote yes.



Matthew Buckett wrote:
> For existing bodington properties they are normally structured in the form:
> 
> section.property=value
> 
> eg:
> 
> sqldatabase.username=sa
> 
> So that it is reasonably easy to see which properties are related. Could 
> we change the i18n properties so they use dots as the separators and so 
> they all start with the same prefix?
> 
> eg:
> 
> lang.default=en
> 
> as at the moment they are of the form:
> 
> default_language=en
>