From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2005-07-20 09:06:41
|
superb, Matthew. so, may i prioritise? as seen in another email forward in this thread, i18n is done, save some bugs on typing, etc. Does everyone agree? Please! 1. HTML Widget - MB already sorting it!-) 2. RSS - estimated 1.5 days - for whom? 3. HSQLDB - estimated 3 days - MB? This is a must, as we have sold a lot of snake oil on this one! 3. EasyBuilder - ?days - whom? Is this quickstart? if so, tis a must as before. 4. Textblocks/Announcements - ?days? - AC/CT? I thought that this was already done(ish) 4. Quicklinks - as above 5. ACL - 1.5days - MB? As above, we have demo'd it!-) (this is without timed access support) that leaves Timed Resources perhaps we leave this off the list of 2.6 and push to 2.8? Tis the sort of thing that if gotten wrong is very bad..... Resource Search How diff is this? Edit Discussion Room Posts Is this not related to MVN stuff? If so, AC promised already to get one out for 2.7.0 next month, which Ox / UHI should be able to slap in asap. But why make a crap hack when the whole thing will change in a matter of weeks? I would drop it of the 2.6 and beta in 2.7.x asap, publish in 2.8. ? -s On 19 Jul 2005, at 18:58, Matthew Buckett wrote: > Matthew Buckett wrote: > >> Paul Davis wrote: >> >> >>> I'm inclined to get 2.6 out the door, and if necessary add stuff in >>> for 2.7 >>> Until 2.6 goes we can't make new Bodix CDs >>> > > As Sean suggested here are my guesses at getting the code into HEAD > that > I am due to be working on. This doesn't include any time for > testing/problems. > > Is it ok to start pushing this stuff in? Or is the I18N not yet > finished? > > >> As far as I know, stuff that isn't in includes: >> >> HSQLDB >> > - Big One, includes refactoring of bodington.properties, ant stuff, > SetupServlet. 3 days. > > >> RSS >> > - Should be reasonably easy. 1.5 days. > > >> ACL >> > - 1.5 days in it's current state (without timed access support). > > >> HTML Widget >> > - 1 day as I have been working on this today. > > >> And as Sean mentioned earlier today we still havn't done any work on >> migration of 2.4 to 2.6. >> > - 3 days. Would be nice to have a dump of a clean 2.1 install and a > 2.4 instal which we can then test the upgrade procedure against. The > problem is that testing this probably shouldn't happen until all the > other code is in. > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |