From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-15 11:13:05
|
> Isn't it better to have some parts of the application > localised than none? agreed - do you want this for 2.6? could probably delegate missing string= s to the default language. Alistair --=20 Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig Isle of Skye Scotland > Alistair Young wrote: > >> There's nothing stopping someone changing the language to "ru" and >> getting >> an unusable bod. > > Shouldn't Bod just display the default strings (english?) if the > translated version of some resource doesn't exist. > > Otherwise we get to the situation that someone does a translation to > french for example. Then we add some new tools (eg my ACL tool) which > uses i18n. > > Now we have the situation where unless someone translates the ACL tool > french users won't be able to upgrade as they will no longer be able to > select french as the language. > > We need to have the idea of a default language that the localiser falls > back to if it can't find the localised version of that string. This way > we don't have to delay software releases so that all the translators ca= n > do thier work. Isn't it better to have some parts of the application > localised than none? > > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7477&alloc_id=3D16492&op=3Dcl= ick > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |