Re: [Bodington-developers] build.xml

[Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...>]

Antony Corfield wrote:
>> I have been closely following this thread as certain people were 
>> suggesting that the build.xml was to blame ;-).
> 
> Was the only way to get your attention ;-)
> 
>> I've altered the DOCTYPE declaration in these files, as they can pick 
>> up the DTD via the CLASSPATH, rather than needing to be hard-wired to 
>> some location deep under /WEB-INF/.
> 
> About time too!
> 
>> I took the rather outrageous step of seeing if all the templates can 
>> compile and be deployed as a running installation. Bizarrely, they can 
>> ...
> 
> 
> Are you crazy!! Never, ever try that again!
> 

Steady now ;-). My sarcasm was primarily directly towards the buckster, 
for it seems as though it was he who thoughtfully introduced these 
breakages, but he's not around to defend himself in person today ...

Alexis