Re: [Bodington-developers] build.xml

[Antony C. <an...@sm...>]

> I have been closely following this thread as certain people were 
> suggesting that the build.xml was to blame ;-).
Was the only way to get your attention ;-)

> I've altered the DOCTYPE declaration in these files, as they can pick 
> up the DTD via the CLASSPATH, rather than needing to be hard-wired to 
> some location deep under /WEB-INF/.
About time too!

> I took the rather outrageous step of seeing if all the templates can 
> compile and be deployed as a running installation. Bizarrely, they can 
> ...

Are you crazy!! Never, ever try that again!