Re: [Bodington-developers] Resource metadata schema

[Antony C. <an...@sm...>]

>> From: Colin Tatham
>> Looks like the metadata schema that Bodington uses to
>> describe resources
>> (Title, Description, etc.) has been replaced by IMS LOM:
>>
>> http://www.imsglobal.org/metadata/index.html
>>

>> The proper solution is to upgrade Bod to use a newer schema -- anyone
>> have views about whether IMS LOM is a good/bad idea?

Well it's a bloody big set of elements for a start ;-)
How about simple Dublin Core -15 elements- which map to LOM
http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/


> BuildingSessionImpl::importMetadata presupposes a top-level metadata
> element named "record" in imported metadata, and will fail if that is
> not found (BuildingSessionImpl:1450).

Yep *Not* good - should really parse against a given schema!



> BuildingSessionImpl::updateBasicMetadata *also* presupposes a =
top-level
> metadata element named "record" in imported metadata, and will fail if
> that is not found (BuildingSessionImpl:1763).  That's called from
> createconfirm in Facility, which would seem pretty key to a running
> Bodington!
>
> 		- Peter
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id=16492&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Bodington-developers mailing list
> Bod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers