From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2005-05-31 13:41:49
|
> From: Alexis O'Connor=20 > Sorry to be so anal about it, but with the limited scope for file=20 > meta-data in CVS (and personal strong opposition to=20 > versioning jars via=20 > the file name!) it strikes me that the third-party versioning=20 > of a file is best placed in the CVS commit comment itself. In the case of jars, many/most carry version information in their manifest. I'm aware of your views on versioning via the filename; I've seen it work both ways (and I've seen the pain caused both ways), so I'm essentially agnostic on that. > It appears as though some muppet has added the xalan from=20 > JWSDP onto the SPWS branch already. That would be me. Or, more accurately, you taking the file from me. > Why he did that when I, I mean, he had the Xalan=20 > library on his machine I don't know ;-). (Ah, probably because he was=20 > trying to second guess where some other developer had got his=20 > jars from...). No, it's because SPWS uses a JAXB-produced parser and therefore I passed the JWSDP libraries to you. I suspect it will be faster to remove the dependency on Sun's custom Xalan from SPWS than it will be to ensure that future uses of Xalan in the rest of Bodington are compatible with Sun's bastardised version. - Peter |