RE: [Bodington-developers] Performance profiling of Bodington

[Adam M. <ada...@co...>]

I suspect that we do not have any evidence whatsoever.=20

Also - I'd wager tomorrow's lunch (a rather nice ham sandwich) that
moodle.org has more users per day than weblearn.

adam
--
Adam Marshall:       OUCS, 13, Banbury Rd. Oxford OX2 6NN.
Shameless plug:      Use the Bodington VLE http://bodington.org
Blog:                http://ramble.oucs.ox.ac.uk/blog/adamm/
Cheese of the month: Cheshire (not to be underestimated)=20

| -----Original Message-----
| From: bod...@li... =
[mailto:bodington-
| dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
| Sent: 25 May 2005 15:40
| To: bod...@li...
| Subject: [Bodington-developers] Performance profiling of Bodington
|=20
| A complete aside.  We have some anecdotal evidence that Bodington
| running under at least some Tomcat versions is "slow".  Do we have any
| more information than that as to what versions of what containers, =
what
| "slow" means, and whether anyone has done any profiling or other
| investigation ito the overall performance of a running Bodington =
system?
|=20
| We're claiming that Bodington is more appropriate than Moodle for =
large
| institutions as Moodle doesn't scale to them and Bodington does.  Do =
we
| have even a shred of evidence to support that comparison?
|=20
| 		- Peter
|=20
|=20
| -------------------------------------------------------
| SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to =
collaborate
| online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of =
travel
| and
| communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as often =
as
| you want. Try it =
free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt02&alloc_id=16135&op=3Dick
| _______________________________________________
| Bodington-developers mailing list
| Bod...@li...
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers