From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-05-10 09:21:58
|
thanks Paul, that just made my life not worth living! If only it would use ordinal in the same way that a user uses the questionnaire, i.e. question 8 is 8, rather than 800 or, well, who knows what else. Alistair On 10 May 2005, at 10:09, Paul Davis wrote: > Alistair >> From a user's perspective the ordinal should be the order that >> questions are > sorted in. Generally, by default, the first question is 100, second > 200 > etc. However if you get to the ninth question and realise this would > be > better after question 7 rather than Q8 you can number it 701 (or > anything > 701 to 799 would work!) When I number something with a single digit it > appears at the top of the list, rather than lower down as you state. > Is > there some extra code in there not showing - try deleting all of the > number > and re-inserting 8 (or did you want 800?) > > On Internet Explorer it's possible to right-click in the summary > frame, view > frame in own window and save that as a separate HTML. Same > functionality in > Firefox. > > Ed Hart had an Excel macro which went into the results and pulled them > all > out into a graphical format in Excel spreadsheet using a macro. An > upgrade > to the system broke this, but if anyone is interested I can hunt for > the > relevant info and forward on. > > Paul > > Paul Davis > 01865 283414 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bod...@li... > [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of > Alistair Young > Sent: 10 May 2005 09:51 > To: 'Bodington Developers' > Subject: [Bodington-developers] Questionnaire tool > > I'm working on a tool that displays questionnaire results as html pages > and am pulling me hair oot! > > in the questionnaire_questions table there's an "ordinal" field, which > seems to be related to the question number, i.e. ordinal=100 means > question number 1. > However, Question 8 in the questionnaire shows as ordinal="701" and > Question 9 shows as ordinal="8". > > Is there any relation between ordinal and question number or is it pure > chance? Or does ordinal allow for sub-questions, such as 7a, 7b etc? if > so, why would 7a show as Question 8? or is that a human fault (I didn't > design the questionnaire) > > ta, > > Alistair > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |