From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2005-05-06 12:06:53
|
No It's sometimes useful to allow people to see that a module is there, even if they can't get at it. If you don't want it to be seen, deny see privilege. --2 for removing "see" Aggie -----Original Message----- From: bod...@li... [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of Alistair Young Sent: 06 May 2005 12:55 To: Bodington Developers Subject: [Bodington-developers] manage resource : see & view I think this is correct: see = the link to the resource, in it's parent, is visible but isn't clickable no see = the link is invisible view = the link to the resource, in it's parent, is visible and clickable no view = the link to the resource, in it's parent, is visible, italicised and not clickable can we bin see? it's very confusing. IMHO if a resource is not to be viewed (accessed) then it's link should be invisible. Why have a load of resource names that you can't click on? vote: remove "see" +1 view ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Bodington-developers mailing list Bod...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |