Menu
▾
▴
bodington-developers
|
From: Colin T. <col...@ou...> - 2006-11-10 14:50:51
|
Hi Aggie We're in the process of adding the Peer Marking tool to WebLearn -- all looks great so far. At this stage we need to provide a brief overview of how it works (and how it could be used in conjunction with other Bod resources). Do you have any notes that we could elaborate on, rather than starting from scratch? Thanks! Colin -- ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org |
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2006-11-10 16:06:03
|
Colin Here's a few points about the peer marker. The peer marker assumes that there are markers, candidates for marking = and one or more moderators. The markers and candidates may be in different groups or in the same group. Markers must have mark privilege. Candidate must have post permission. Moderators must have manage privilege. A user can be both a marker and a candidate. Whether he/she can mark = him/her self is a property of the peer marker. When you create a peer marker, you have the option of allowing marking = only once, or allowing markers to re-mark and also the option to disallow self-marking. The peer marker tool allows you to create/edit items for marking. These will usually take the form of a marking instruction and a marking range. = A typical marking instruction would be: 'Please give a mark between zero (worst) and 10 (best) that you think represents the contribution that = each member has made to the group's discussion.' You can add more items, = each with its own instruction and marking range. When a marker accesses the peer marker, for each item they see a list of names of the persons whose work is to be marked. =20 Note that the work to be marked is entirely separate from the peer = marker - it can be a discussion, work upload to a pigeonhole, a website. It can = even be an activity outside Bodington. =20 The marker sets marks for each candidate and then records the marks. If = the marker has review privilege, he/she can review the marks he/she has = given. If 'Marking allowed only once' (a peer marker property) is unchecked, = then he/she can change the marks he/she has given. (I check 'Marking allowed only once' and uncheck 'Marking self = allowed'.) The marks can be reviewed and moderated by a moderator, who must have = manage permission. He/she can get a list of the marks given by each marker, = the marks received by each candidate, or an overall summary of the marks. = The moderator can change any of the marks, can disallow individual marks, or = can disallow all of a marker's marks. This is necessary when allowing = students to peer-mark, as not all of the students will take the marking = seriously. When the moderator is satisfied that the marks represent a fair = assessment of each candidate, he/she can examine a summary of marks across all peer marker tools at the same level in the hierarchy (so if you have several = peer marker tools, one for each of a set of groups, you can all of their = marks in one go.) Moderated marks will be shown in red and disallowed marks = will be indicated with an X. The moderator can also export the marks as a CSV file for further manipulation in Excel etc. Hope this helps. Aggie -----Original Message----- From: bod...@li... [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of Colin Tatham Sent: 10 November 2006 14:51 To: Bodington developers Subject: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool Hi Aggie We're in the process of adding the Peer Marking tool to WebLearn -- all looks great so far. At this=20 stage we need to provide a brief overview of how it works (and how it = could be used in conjunction=20 with other Bod resources). Do you have any notes that we could elaborate = on, rather than starting=20 from scratch? Thanks! Colin --=20 ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, = security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache = Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Bodington-developers mailing list Bod...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
|
From: Colin T. <col...@ou...> - 2006-11-10 17:10:11
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > Here's a few points about the peer marker. Excellent, thanks Aggie! Colin > The peer marker assumes that there are markers, candidates for marking and > one or more moderators. The markers and candidates may be in different > groups or in the same group. > > Markers must have mark privilege. > Candidate must have post permission. > Moderators must have manage privilege. > > A user can be both a marker and a candidate. Whether he/she can mark him/her > self is a property of the peer marker. > > When you create a peer marker, you have the option of allowing marking only > once, or allowing markers to re-mark and also the option to disallow > self-marking. > > The peer marker tool allows you to create/edit items for marking. These > will usually take the form of a marking instruction and a marking range. A > typical marking instruction would be: 'Please give a mark between zero > (worst) and 10 (best) that you think represents the contribution that each > member has made to the group's discussion.' You can add more items, each > with its own instruction and marking range. > > When a marker accesses the peer marker, for each item they see a list of > names of the persons whose work is to be marked. > > Note that the work to be marked is entirely separate from the peer marker - > it can be a discussion, work upload to a pigeonhole, a website. It can even > be an activity outside Bodington. > > The marker sets marks for each candidate and then records the marks. If the > marker has review privilege, he/she can review the marks he/she has given. > If 'Marking allowed only once' (a peer marker property) is unchecked, then > he/she can change the marks he/she has given. > > (I check 'Marking allowed only once' and uncheck 'Marking self allowed'.) > > The marks can be reviewed and moderated by a moderator, who must have manage > permission. He/she can get a list of the marks given by each marker, the > marks received by each candidate, or an overall summary of the marks. The > moderator can change any of the marks, can disallow individual marks, or can > disallow all of a marker's marks. This is necessary when allowing students > to peer-mark, as not all of the students will take the marking seriously. > > When the moderator is satisfied that the marks represent a fair assessment > of each candidate, he/she can examine a summary of marks across all peer > marker tools at the same level in the hierarchy (so if you have several peer > marker tools, one for each of a set of groups, you can all of their marks > in one go.) Moderated marks will be shown in red and disallowed marks will > be indicated with an X. > > The moderator can also export the marks as a CSV file for further > manipulation in Excel etc. > > Hope this helps. > > Aggie > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bod...@li... > [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of > Colin Tatham > Sent: 10 November 2006 14:51 > To: Bodington developers > Subject: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool > > Hi Aggie > > We're in the process of adding the Peer Marking tool to WebLearn -- all > looks great so far. At this > stage we need to provide a brief overview of how it works (and how it could > be used in conjunction > with other Bod resources). Do you have any notes that we could elaborate on, > rather than starting > from scratch? > > Thanks! > > Colin > -- ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org |
|
From: Paul T. <pau...@ou...> - 2007-01-09 14:41:49
|
Aggie, We upgraded WebLearn today and have at the top of our new features the Peer Marking tool :-) Just wondering if you've produced any documentation in addition to the notes you provided below...? Regards, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Trafford WebLearn Administrator Oxford University Computing Services pau...@ou... 01865 283429 Details of WebLearn's latest release: http://www.weblearn.ox.ac.uk/site/info/announce/2_14/ -------------------------------------------------------------- On 10/11/2006 16:05, Andrew Booth wrote: > Colin > > Here's a few points about the peer marker. > > > The peer marker assumes that there are markers, candidates for marking and > one or more moderators. The markers and candidates may be in different > groups or in the same group. > > Markers must have mark privilege. > Candidate must have post permission. > Moderators must have manage privilege. > > A user can be both a marker and a candidate. Whether he/she can mark him/her > self is a property of the peer marker. > > When you create a peer marker, you have the option of allowing marking only > once, or allowing markers to re-mark and also the option to disallow > self-marking. > > The peer marker tool allows you to create/edit items for marking. These > will usually take the form of a marking instruction and a marking range. A > typical marking instruction would be: 'Please give a mark between zero > (worst) and 10 (best) that you think represents the contribution that each > member has made to the group's discussion.' You can add more items, each > with its own instruction and marking range. > > When a marker accesses the peer marker, for each item they see a list of > names of the persons whose work is to be marked. > > Note that the work to be marked is entirely separate from the peer marker - > it can be a discussion, work upload to a pigeonhole, a website. It can even > be an activity outside Bodington. > > The marker sets marks for each candidate and then records the marks. If the > marker has review privilege, he/she can review the marks he/she has given. > If 'Marking allowed only once' (a peer marker property) is unchecked, then > he/she can change the marks he/she has given. > > (I check 'Marking allowed only once' and uncheck 'Marking self allowed'.) > > The marks can be reviewed and moderated by a moderator, who must have manage > permission. He/she can get a list of the marks given by each marker, the > marks received by each candidate, or an overall summary of the marks. The > moderator can change any of the marks, can disallow individual marks, or can > disallow all of a marker's marks. This is necessary when allowing students > to peer-mark, as not all of the students will take the marking seriously. > > When the moderator is satisfied that the marks represent a fair assessment > of each candidate, he/she can examine a summary of marks across all peer > marker tools at the same level in the hierarchy (so if you have several peer > marker tools, one for each of a set of groups, you can all of their marks > in one go.) Moderated marks will be shown in red and disallowed marks will > be indicated with an X. > > The moderator can also export the marks as a CSV file for further > manipulation in Excel etc. > > Hope this helps. > > Aggie > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bod...@li... > [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of > Colin Tatham > Sent: 10 November 2006 14:51 > To: Bodington developers > Subject: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool > > Hi Aggie > > We're in the process of adding the Peer Marking tool to WebLearn -- all > looks great so far. At this > stage we need to provide a brief overview of how it works (and how it could > be used in conjunction > with other Bod resources). Do you have any notes that we could elaborate on, > rather than starting > from scratch? > > Thanks! > > Colin > > |
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2007-01-09 14:53:57
|
Paul No, but the VLE Service at Leeds have someone lined up to do it soon. Aggie ___________________________________________________ Andrew G Booth Professor of Online Learning Institute of Life Sciences Education Faculty of Biological Sciences Garstang Building University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K. Tel: +44-113-343-3142 ___________________________________________________ No Education Patents Boycott Blackboard http://www.noedupatents.org/ ___________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Paul Trafford [mailto:pau...@ou...]=20 Sent: 09 January 2007 14:37 To: a.g...@le...; Bodington developers Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool Aggie, We upgraded WebLearn today and have at the top of our new features the Peer Marking tool :-) Just wondering if you've produced any documentation in addition to the notes you provided below...?=20 Regards, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Trafford WebLearn Administrator Oxford University Computing Services pau...@ou... 01865 283429 Details of WebLearn's latest release: http://www.weblearn.ox.ac.uk/site/info/announce/2_14/ --------------------------------------------------------------=20 On 10/11/2006 16:05, Andrew Booth wrote: > Colin > > Here's a few points about the peer marker. > > > The peer marker assumes that there are markers, candidates for marking = and > one or more moderators. The markers and candidates may be in different > groups or in the same group. > > Markers must have mark privilege. > Candidate must have post permission. > Moderators must have manage privilege. > > A user can be both a marker and a candidate. Whether he/she can mark him/her > self is a property of the peer marker. > > When you create a peer marker, you have the option of allowing = marking only > once, or allowing markers to re-mark and also the option to disallow > self-marking. > > The peer marker tool allows you to create/edit items for marking. = These > will usually take the form of a marking instruction and a marking = range. A > typical marking instruction would be: 'Please give a mark between zero > (worst) and 10 (best) that you think represents the contribution that = each > member has made to the group's discussion.' You can add more items, = each > with its own instruction and marking range. > > When a marker accesses the peer marker, for each item they see a list = of > names of the persons whose work is to be marked. =20 > > Note that the work to be marked is entirely separate from the peer = marker - > it can be a discussion, work upload to a pigeonhole, a website. It can even > be an activity outside Bodington. =20 > > The marker sets marks for each candidate and then records the marks. = If the > marker has review privilege, he/she can review the marks he/she has = given. > If 'Marking allowed only once' (a peer marker property) is unchecked, = then > he/she can change the marks he/she has given. > > (I check 'Marking allowed only once' and uncheck 'Marking self = allowed'.) > > The marks can be reviewed and moderated by a moderator, who must have manage > permission. He/she can get a list of the marks given by each marker, = the > marks received by each candidate, or an overall summary of the marks. = The > moderator can change any of the marks, can disallow individual marks, = or can > disallow all of a marker's marks. This is necessary when allowing students > to peer-mark, as not all of the students will take the marking = seriously. > > When the moderator is satisfied that the marks represent a fair = assessment > of each candidate, he/she can examine a summary of marks across all = peer > marker tools at the same level in the hierarchy (so if you have = several peer > marker tools, one for each of a set of groups, you can all of their = marks > in one go.) Moderated marks will be shown in red and disallowed marks will > be indicated with an X. > > The moderator can also export the marks as a CSV file for further > manipulation in Excel etc. > > Hope this helps. > > Aggie > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bod...@li... > [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf = Of > Colin Tatham > Sent: 10 November 2006 14:51 > To: Bodington developers > Subject: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool > > Hi Aggie > > We're in the process of adding the Peer Marking tool to WebLearn -- = all > looks great so far. At this=20 > stage we need to provide a brief overview of how it works (and how it could > be used in conjunction=20 > with other Bod resources). Do you have any notes that we could = elaborate on, > rather than starting=20 > from scratch? > > Thanks! > > Colin > > =20 |
|
From: Paul T. <pau...@ou...> - 2007-01-09 15:01:14
|
Aggie, Okay, thanks for the info. In that case, I'll probably just knock up a 'quickstart' guide to begin with. - Paul On 09/01/2007 14:53, Andrew Booth wrote: > Paul > > No, but the VLE Service at Leeds have someone lined up to do it soon. > > Aggie > > ___________________________________________________ > > Andrew G Booth > Professor of Online Learning > Institute of Life Sciences Education > Faculty of Biological Sciences > Garstang Building > University of Leeds > Leeds LS2 9JT > U.K. > Tel: +44-113-343-3142 > ___________________________________________________ > > No Education Patents > Boycott Blackboard > http://www.noedupatents.org/ > ___________________________________________________ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Trafford [mailto:pau...@ou...] > Sent: 09 January 2007 14:37 > To: a.g...@le...; Bodington developers > Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool > > Aggie, > > We upgraded WebLearn today and have at the top of our new features the > Peer Marking tool :-) Just wondering if you've produced any > documentation in addition to the notes you provided below...? > > Regards, > > Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Paul Trafford > WebLearn Administrator > Oxford University Computing Services > pau...@ou... > 01865 283429 > > Details of WebLearn's latest release: > http://www.weblearn.ox.ac.uk/site/info/announce/2_14/ > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On 10/11/2006 16:05, Andrew Booth wrote: > >> Colin >> >> Here's a few points about the peer marker. >> >> >> The peer marker assumes that there are markers, candidates for marking and >> one or more moderators. The markers and candidates may be in different >> groups or in the same group. >> >> Markers must have mark privilege. >> Candidate must have post permission. >> Moderators must have manage privilege. >> >> A user can be both a marker and a candidate. Whether he/she can mark >> > him/her > >> self is a property of the peer marker. >> >> When you create a peer marker, you have the option of allowing marking >> > only > >> once, or allowing markers to re-mark and also the option to disallow >> self-marking. >> >> The peer marker tool allows you to create/edit items for marking. These >> will usually take the form of a marking instruction and a marking range. A >> typical marking instruction would be: 'Please give a mark between zero >> (worst) and 10 (best) that you think represents the contribution that each >> member has made to the group's discussion.' You can add more items, each >> with its own instruction and marking range. >> >> When a marker accesses the peer marker, for each item they see a list of >> names of the persons whose work is to be marked. >> >> Note that the work to be marked is entirely separate from the peer marker >> > - > >> it can be a discussion, work upload to a pigeonhole, a website. It can >> > even > >> be an activity outside Bodington. >> >> The marker sets marks for each candidate and then records the marks. If >> > the > >> marker has review privilege, he/she can review the marks he/she has given. >> If 'Marking allowed only once' (a peer marker property) is unchecked, then >> he/she can change the marks he/she has given. >> >> (I check 'Marking allowed only once' and uncheck 'Marking self allowed'.) >> >> The marks can be reviewed and moderated by a moderator, who must have >> > manage > >> permission. He/she can get a list of the marks given by each marker, the >> marks received by each candidate, or an overall summary of the marks. The >> moderator can change any of the marks, can disallow individual marks, or >> > can > >> disallow all of a marker's marks. This is necessary when allowing >> > students > >> to peer-mark, as not all of the students will take the marking seriously. >> >> When the moderator is satisfied that the marks represent a fair assessment >> of each candidate, he/she can examine a summary of marks across all peer >> marker tools at the same level in the hierarchy (so if you have several >> > peer > >> marker tools, one for each of a set of groups, you can all of their marks >> in one go.) Moderated marks will be shown in red and disallowed marks >> > will > >> be indicated with an X. >> >> The moderator can also export the marks as a CSV file for further >> manipulation in Excel etc. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> Aggie >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: bod...@li... >> [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of >> Colin Tatham >> Sent: 10 November 2006 14:51 >> To: Bodington developers >> Subject: [Bodington-developers] Peer Marking tool >> >> Hi Aggie >> >> We're in the process of adding the Peer Marking tool to WebLearn -- all >> looks great so far. At this >> stage we need to provide a brief overview of how it works (and how it >> > could > >> be used in conjunction >> with other Bod resources). Do you have any notes that we could elaborate >> > on, > >> rather than starting >> from scratch? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Colin >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Trafford WebLearn Administrator Computing Services 13 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 6NN pau...@ou... x. 83429 Educause Connect Profile: http://connect.educause.edu/user/pault Details of WebLearn's latest release: http://www.weblearn.ox.ac.uk/site/info/announce/2_14/ -------------------------------------------------------------- |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X