From: Colin T. <col...@ou...> - 2006-11-02 10:36:02
|
Hi Think this has been discussed in some form or another before, but as Michael Thomas discovered, there are two version of Xalan in the repository -- one in the lib folder, and another in the guanxi.war. At the moment the Guanxi version is copied by the build.xml, which means content packaging is broken. We could change the build.xml to fix it for content packaging, but would that break Guanxi? Does Guanxi need its version, or could it use the existing one? Thanks Colin -- ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2006-11-02 14:30:18
|
Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan though as it'll use xmlbeans. I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on binning xalan in gx anyway. --=20 Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig Isle of Skye Scotland > Hi > > Think this has been discussed in some form or another before, but as > Michael Thomas discovered, > there are two version of Xalan in the repository -- one in the lib fold= er, > and another in the > guanxi.war. At the moment the Guanxi version is copied by the build.xml= , > which means content > packaging is broken. We could change the build.xml to fix it for conten= t > packaging, but would that > break Guanxi? Does Guanxi need its version, or could it use the existin= g > one? > > Thanks > > Colin > > > > -- > ____________________________________ > Colin Tatham > VLE Team > Oxford University Computing Services > > http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ > http://bodington.org > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit= y? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron= imo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Selwyn L. <sel...@ph...> - 2006-11-02 14:33:33
|
now they sound tasty [with or without chilli sauce] Alistair Young wrote: >Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan >though as it'll use xmlbeans. > >I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on binning >xalan in gx anyway. > > > -- Selwyn Lloyd Phosphorix Open Source Systems for Lifelong Learning skype: selwyn_lloyd tel: 07979240124 irc://irc.ionode.org support channel: #ionode support email: de...@ph... web: http://www.phosphorix.co.uk forum: http://forum.ionetwork.ac.uk |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@ou...> - 2006-11-02 14:44:44
|
Alistair Young wrote: > Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan > though as it'll use xmlbeans. > > I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on binning > xalan in gx anyway. > In the interests of maintaining treating the guanxi.war as a "black box" within the bodington repository, I was going to add a 1-line excludes for the xalan.jar coming from the guanxi.war. (Incidentally, in the future /when/ it disapears, you *don't* get an error for excluding a non-existent file). Anyone have any violent objections to me doing that? Alexis |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@ou...> - 2006-11-02 14:45:55
|
Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Alistair Young wrote: >> Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan >> though as it'll use xmlbeans. >> >> I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on binning >> xalan in gx anyway. >> > > In the interests of maintaining treating the guanxi.war as a "black box" within > the bodington repository, I was going to add a 1-line excludes for the xalan.jar > coming from the guanxi.war. (Incidentally, in the future /when/ it disapears, > you *don't* get an error for excluding a non-existent file). > > Anyone have any violent objections to me doing that? > > Alexis > Ahem, I'm talking about within the build.xml of course ;-). Alexis |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2006-11-02 17:56:56
|
violence? moi? why don't you migrate to maven and specify the dependencie= s that way? gx jars would then sit in the bod repository and you could buil= d a bod release without or without gx using maven targets. How long will it take you to migrate to maven btw? --=20 Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig Isle of Skye Scotland > Alexis O'Connor wrote: >> Alistair Young wrote: >>> Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan >>> though as it'll use xmlbeans. >>> >>> I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on >>> binning >>> xalan in gx anyway. >>> >> >> In the interests of maintaining treating the guanxi.war as a "black bo= x" >> within >> the bodington repository, I was going to add a 1-line excludes for the >> xalan.jar >> coming from the guanxi.war. (Incidentally, in the future /when/ it >> disapears, >> you *don't* get an error for excluding a non-existent file). >> >> Anyone have any violent objections to me doing that? >> >> Alexis >> > > Ahem, I'm talking about within the build.xml of course ;-). > > Alexis > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit= y? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron= imo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@ou...> - 2006-11-03 10:07:14
|
Alistair Young wrote: > violence? moi? why don't you migrate to maven and specify the dependencies > that way? gx jars would then sit in the bod repository and you could build > a bod release without or without gx using maven targets. > > How long will it take you to migrate to maven btw? > Ahem, I will dignify your reply with an answer ;-). As it happens, I do think it would be good if we built bodington using Maven, especially due to the way it handles jar file dependancies. However, whilst that approach would probably take me a day or so (I've never written a Maven build file) I already have a 1 line fix, with 2 lines of explanation sitting on my machine ready to commit, to the existing Ant build file. Therefore I'm going to go ahead and do this. Also bearing in mind that I'm treating guanxi.war as a black box, maven wouldn't particularly help here anyway; that's where the 'below par' xalan.jar is. Once you've got guanxi being built via maven, I'll do the same for bodington. Whilst you're about it, you can make sure that no CVS meta-directories end up in the war file this time ;-). Alexis |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@ou...> - 2006-11-03 10:19:04
|
Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Alexis O'Connor wrote: >> Alistair Young wrote: >>> Guanxi should work with any xalan - the next release won't need xalan >>> though as it'll use xmlbeans. >>> >>> I'd say best use the one that works with bod, as I'm planning on binning >>> xalan in gx anyway. >>> >> In the interests of maintaining treating the guanxi.war as a "black box" within >> the bodington repository, I was going to add a 1-line excludes for the xalan.jar >> coming from the guanxi.war. (Incidentally, in the future /when/ it disapears, >> you *don't* get an error for excluding a non-existent file). >> >> Anyone have any violent objections to me doing that? >> >> Alexis >> > > Ahem, I'm talking about within the build.xml of course ;-). > > Alexis > 'Tis done. Committed to HEAD and bodington_2_8 branch. Now off to familiarize myself with the yiddish one who imparts his knowledge to others :-). Alexis |