Menu
▾
▴
bodington-developers
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-06-27 17:40:18
|
One generally expects a collapse icon or command to appear attached to the thing that is going to collapse. Couldn't the collapse button/command appear in the frame itself? As an icon it could also be sized relative to the font. The expand frame icon/command could appear on the left hand edge of the main frame. Jon Sean Mehan wrote: > also, the arrows on the LHS collapse isn't accessible (SENDA). When I > enlarge the text, the gifs disappear. If it were text then we would > see it at least.!-) > > > s > > On 27 Jun 2006, at 16:04, Adam Marshall wrote: > > >> But you don't get the LHS panel in many of the tools, plus, what if >> people >> have it turned off? They'll never see the search. >> >> Adam >> >> | -----Original Message----- >> | From: bod...@li... >> | [mailto:bod...@li...] On >> Behalf Of >> | Antony Corfield >> | Sent: 27 June 2006 12:27 >> | To: Bodington developers >> | Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Top frame styling improvement- >> | commitedto HEAD >> | >> | tested that and it works well with safari, thanks Jon - think we'll >> | take that and move search to left.html. >> | Antony >> | >> | On 26 Jun 2006, at 11:00, Jon Maber wrote: >> | >> | > Antony Corfield wrote: >> | >>> http://www.beechtreecommon.org/consultancy/test/ >> bs_template_top.htm >> | >>> >> | >> URL not found! >> | > Oops, I changed it after sending that. >> | > http://www.beechtreecommon.org/consultancy/test/ >> | > >> | > >> | > >> | > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >> | > security? >> | > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make >> your job >> | > easier >> | > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >> | > Geronimo >> | > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >> | > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >> | > _______________________________________________ >> | > Bodington-developers mailing list >> | > Bod...@li... >> | > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> | >> | >> | Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >> security? >> | Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make >> your job >> | easier >> | Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >> Geronimo >> | http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >> | _______________________________________________ >> | Bodington-developers mailing list >> | Bod...@li... >> | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> >> >> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >> security? >> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >> job easier >> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >> Geronimo >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-06-27 19:08:08
|
yeah, or one could just write Open or Expand or something when it isn't, and Close or Reduce or something when it is.... s On 27 Jun 2006, at 18:09, Jon Maber wrote: > One generally expects a collapse icon or command to appear attached to > the thing that is going to collapse. Couldn't the collapse > button/command appear in the frame itself? As an icon it could > also be > sized relative to the font. The expand frame icon/command could > appear > on the left hand edge of the main frame. > Jon > > > Sean Mehan wrote: >> also, the arrows on the LHS collapse isn't accessible (SENDA). When I >> enlarge the text, the gifs disappear. If it were text then we would >> see it at least.!-) >> >> >> s >> >> On 27 Jun 2006, at 16:04, Adam Marshall wrote: >> >> >>> But you don't get the LHS panel in many of the tools, plus, what if >>> people >>> have it turned off? They'll never see the search. >>> >>> Adam >>> >>> | -----Original Message----- >>> | From: bod...@li... >>> | [mailto:bod...@li...] On >>> Behalf Of >>> | Antony Corfield >>> | Sent: 27 June 2006 12:27 >>> | To: Bodington developers >>> | Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Top frame styling improvement- >>> | commitedto HEAD >>> | >>> | tested that and it works well with safari, thanks Jon - think >>> we'll >>> | take that and move search to left.html. >>> | Antony >>> | >>> | On 26 Jun 2006, at 11:00, Jon Maber wrote: >>> | >>> | > Antony Corfield wrote: >>> | >>> http://www.beechtreecommon.org/consultancy/test/ >>> bs_template_top.htm >>> | >>> >>> | >> URL not found! >>> | > Oops, I changed it after sending that. >>> | > http://www.beechtreecommon.org/consultancy/test/ >>> | > >>> | > >>> | > >>> | > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >>> | > security? >>> | > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make >>> your job >>> | > easier >>> | > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on >>> Apache >>> | > Geronimo >>> | > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >>> | > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >>> | > _______________________________________________ >>> | > Bodington-developers mailing list >>> | > Bod...@li... >>> | > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington- >>> developers >>> | >>> | >>> | Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >>> security? >>> | Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make >>> your job >>> | easier >>> | Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >>> Geronimo >>> | http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >>> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >>> | _______________________________________________ >>> | Bodington-developers mailing list >>> | Bod...@li... >>> | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >>> >>> >>> >>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >>> security? >>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >>> job easier >>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >>> Geronimo >>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >>> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bodington-developers mailing list >>> Bod...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >>> >>> >> >> >> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >> security? >> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >> job easier >> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >> Geronimo >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-06-24 13:07:22
|
Here are some more screen shots that didnt fit in the last email. This time text is enlarged to 150% and I tried out a few more browsers. Jon |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-06-26 08:28:25
|
Jon Maber wrote: > Here are some more screen shots that didnt fit in the last email. This > time text is enlarged to 150% and I tried out a few more browsers. Quickly looking at top.html it seems that top_big.css is no longer used: > <link href="bs_template_top_normal.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> > > <if> > <test> > <call> > <target method="equals"><literal type="String">small</literal></target> > <parameters> > <call> > <target method="getAutomaticPreferenceByScreenSize"><variable name="facility"/></target> > <parameters> > <variable name="request"/> > <literal type="String">preference.navigation.nav_bar_height</literal> > <literal type="String">small</literal> > <literal type="String">big</literal> > </parameters> > </call> > </parameters> > </call> > </test> > <then> > <link href="bs_template_top_small.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> > </then> > <else></else> > </if> -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-06-26 13:30:17
|
Matthew Buckett wrote: > Jon Maber wrote: > >> Here are some more screen shots that didnt fit in the last email. This >> time text is enlarged to 150% and I tried out a few more browsers. >> > > Quickly looking at top.html it seems that top_big.css is no longer used: > Correct - if the normal style sheet copes with an increased basic font size then it isn't needed. The small one is still needed because it doesnt refer to a small font, but rather to a small frame height. However instead of replacing the normal one which means that you have to keep it in synch with changes to it, it follows the normal one and contains just a couple of entries which adjust the height in pixels of the various boxes. Jon |
|
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2006-06-26 09:51:44
|
On 24 Jun 2006, at 13:21, Jon Maber wrote: > Sorry to bring the thread back on topic O:-) but here is the > result of some further work on styling. > > Ive tested on a large range of browsers (if you're all very good I'll > tell you how) at 100% font size and at 150% font size. Some examples > (including Safari) are attached to this message. > > You can try the mock-up page yourself at: > > http://www.beechtreecommon.org/consultancy/test/bs_template_top.htm URL not found! > > Jon > > <6475387.jpg><6475388.jpg><6475389.jpg><6475390.jpg><6475391.jpg><64753 > 92.jpg>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642_______________________________ > ________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-06-21 16:05:15
|
how about a screen grab? s <quote who=3D"Jon Maber"> > Antony Corfield wrote: >> with Safari... >> Loose location icons along with search and links except logout. >> > Could you elaborate? Are the icons missing all the time? >> Shrinking window causes text to collapse better but eventually spills >> over into login div. >> > Does the overspilling text overwrite the content of the lower box or > push it down? > > A not very pro CSS solution would be to go back to the use of a table. > I.e. one row, two cells. The height of the row could be fixed and the > width of the right hand cell fixed. This solution would not be too bad > for accessibility because it could be navigated linearly and would work > better with browsers that implement CSS to version 1 or dont handle it > at all. What do you think about tables? > > > Jon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > --=20 Sean Mehan Head of e-Frameworks Learning and Information Services UHI |
|
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2006-06-21 14:29:58
|
On 21 Jun 2006, at 15:21, Jon Maber wrote: > Antony Corfield wrote: >> with Safari... >> Loose location icons along with search and links except logout. >> > Could you elaborate? Are the icons missing all the time? Yes can't seem to get them back! >> Shrinking window causes text to collapse better but eventually spills >> over into login div. >> > Does the overspilling text overwrite the content of the lower box or > push it down? pushes it down which is reasonable behavior for css with small browser window > > A not very pro CSS solution would be to go back to the use of a table. > I.e. one row, two cells. The height of the row could be fixed and the > width of the right hand cell fixed. This solution would not be too bad > for accessibility because it could be navigated linearly and would work > better with browsers that implement CSS to version 1 or dont handle it > at all. What do you think about tables? > > > Jon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
|
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2006-06-21 14:42:16
|
We're trying to fix problems caused by using frames, not sure if there is an easy solution! On 21 Jun 2006, at 15:29, Antony Corfield wrote: > On 21 Jun 2006, at 15:21, Jon Maber wrote: > >> Antony Corfield wrote: >>> with Safari... >>> Loose location icons along with search and links except logout. >>> >> Could you elaborate? Are the icons missing all the time? > Yes can't seem to get them back! >>> Shrinking window causes text to collapse better but eventually spills >>> over into login div. >>> >> Does the overspilling text overwrite the content of the lower box or >> push it down? > pushes it down which is reasonable behavior for css with small browser > window >> >> A not very pro CSS solution would be to go back to the use of a table. >> I.e. one row, two cells. The height of the row could be fixed and the >> width of the right hand cell fixed. This solution would not be too bad >> for accessibility because it could be navigated linearly and would >> work >> better with browsers that implement CSS to version 1 or dont handle it >> at all. What do you think about tables? >> >> >> Jon >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X