bodington-developers

Re: [Bodington-developers] Testing 2.8

[Peter C. <Pet...@me...>]

> From: Jon Maber
> 1) Stuff gets commited to CVS so I get grab it and build. (I=20
> dont want to keep rebuilding and retesting)

Done.  Some of the XML repository upgrade script appears to have gone
from HEAD, however - anyone want to comment on why?

> 2) The detail gets added to the list of new features so I=20
> know how the=20
> new functionality is supposed to behave rather than test=20
> against what I guess is its proper behaviour.

Done.

		- Peter

Re: [Bodington-developers] Testing 2.8

[Peter C. <Pet...@me...>]

> From: Jon Maber
> By the way of the by the way, isn't this wiki page coding bizarrely=20
> arcane? Its like WordStar cerca 1980.

I find it pleasantly normal compared to most wikis I've used.

		- Peter

Re: [Bodington-developers] Testing 2.8

[Matthew B. <mat...@ou...>]

Peter Crowther wrote:
>> From: Jon Maber
>> 1) Stuff gets commited to CVS so I get grab it and build. (I 
>> dont want to keep rebuilding and retesting)
> 
> Done.  Some of the XML repository upgrade script appears to have gone
> from HEAD, however - anyone want to comment on why?

Well if developer CVS I'd have a look..... blinking sourceforge.... at 
least anon CVS seems working.

Where has it gone from? What was the file?

-- 
  -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer
  -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services
  -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/

Re: [Bodington-developers] Testing 2.8

[Sean M. <se...@sm...>]

not me, guv...



s
<quote who=3D"Peter Crowther">
>> From: Jon Maber
>> 1) Stuff gets commited to CVS so I get grab it and build. (I
>> dont want to keep rebuilding and retesting)
>
> Done.  Some of the XML repository upgrade script appears to have gone
> from HEAD, however - anyone want to comment on why?
>
>> 2) The detail gets added to the list of new features so I
>> know how the
>> new functionality is supposed to behave rather than test
>> against what I guess is its proper behaviour.
>
> Done.
>
> 		- Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bodington-developers mailing list
> Bod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers
>


--=20
Sean Mehan
Head of e-Frameworks
Learning and Information Services
UHI

Re: [Bodington-developers] Testing 2.8

[Adam M. <ada...@co...>]

What file(s) are you talking about? Isnt there a CVS history that could help
here?

adam

| -----Original Message-----
| From: bod...@li...
| [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of
| Sean Mehan
| Sent: 09 June 2006 13:02
| To: Bodington developers
| Cc: Bodington developers
| Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Testing 2.8
| 
| not me, guv...
| 
| 
| 
| s
| <quote who="Peter Crowther">
| >> From: Jon Maber
| >> 1) Stuff gets commited to CVS so I get grab it and build. (I
| >> dont want to keep rebuilding and retesting)
| >
| > Done.  Some of the XML repository upgrade script appears to have gone
| > from HEAD, however - anyone want to comment on why?
| >
| >> 2) The detail gets added to the list of new features so I
| >> know how the
| >> new functionality is supposed to behave rather than test
| >> against what I guess is its proper behaviour.
| >
| > Done.
| >
| > 		- Peter
| >
| >
| > _______________________________________________
| > Bodington-developers mailing list
| > Bod...@li...
| > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers
| >
| 
| 
| --
| Sean Mehan
| Head of e-Frameworks
| Learning and Information Services
| UHI
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| Bodington-developers mailing list
| Bod...@li...
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers