Menu
▾
▴
bodington-developers
|
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-22 11:32:26
|
Funny things going on in XmlTemplate: i18n creates template classes of the form: template_*_en.class template_*_gd.class etc. but now I'm seeing: template_*.class and creationmenu.html in any area isn't compiled. It's not even looked at - no error, java or class files I noticed that XmlTemplate had a "dependancy bug" fixed - does anyone know why the i18n behaviour has changed - is this related to creationmenu not compiling? Alistair |
|
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-22 13:27:27
|
Alistair Young wrote: > Funny things going on in XmlTemplate: > > i18n creates template classes of the form: > template_*_en.class > template_*_gd.class > etc. > > but now I'm seeing: > template_*.class > > and creationmenu.html in any area isn't compiled. It's not even looked > at - no error, java or class files > > I noticed that XmlTemplate had a "dependancy bug" fixed - does anyone > know why the i18n behaviour has changed - is this related to > creationmenu not compiling? > > Alistair > Language has no meaning for legacy templates, therefore the corresponding class files have no language suffix. I currently have corresponding creationmenu.html class files for my default, floor and menu directories. These were created dynamically by running Bodington yesterday afternoon. Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further investigation Alexis |
|
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-22 13:33:56
|
> Language has no meaning for legacy templates ah! thanks for clarifying, makes sense now! > Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further > investigation I updated my bod with the templates I got from head today, there was only about a day's difference but it works now. too much going on in head to do meaningful testing methinks. Alistair On 22 Jul 2005, at 14:27, Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Alistair Young wrote: > >> Funny things going on in XmlTemplate: >> i18n creates template classes of the form: >> template_*_en.class >> template_*_gd.class >> etc. >> but now I'm seeing: >> template_*.class >> and creationmenu.html in any area isn't compiled. It's not even >> looked at - no error, java or class files >> I noticed that XmlTemplate had a "dependancy bug" fixed - does >> anyone know why the i18n behaviour has changed - is this related >> to creationmenu not compiling? >> Alistair >> > > Language has no meaning for legacy templates, therefore the > corresponding class files have no language suffix. > > I currently have corresponding creationmenu.html class files for my > default, floor and menu directories. These were created dynamically > by running Bodington yesterday afternoon. > > Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further > investigation > > Alexis > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-22 13:45:30
|
Alistair Young wrote: >> Language has no meaning for legacy templates > > ah! thanks for clarifying, makes sense now! > >> Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further >> investigation > > I updated my bod with the templates I got from head today, there was > only about a day's difference but it works now. > > too much going on in head to do meaningful testing methinks. Indeed. I am worried that it we attempt an official Bodington 2.6 release at the end of this month it is likley to be buggy because of the large number of changes that have happened over a short period of time. As a halfway house could we make a release candidate available at the end of July that contains most of the new features but not actually release until we are a little more sure that the product is stable and well tested. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
|
From: 'Adam Marshall' <ada...@co...> - 2005-07-22 14:50:34
|
Why not release it as 2.5. As this is what it is! adam -----Original Message----- From: bod...@li... [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of Matthew Buckett Sent: 22 July 2005 14:43 To: bod...@li... Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] creationmenu.html problem Alistair Young wrote: >> Language has no meaning for legacy templates > > ah! thanks for clarifying, makes sense now! > >> Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further >> investigation > > I updated my bod with the templates I got from head today, there was > only about a day's difference but it works now. > > too much going on in head to do meaningful testing methinks. Indeed. I am worried that it we attempt an official Bodington 2.6 release at the end of this month it is likley to be buggy because of the large number of changes that have happened over a short period of time. As a halfway house could we make a release candidate available at the end of July that contains most of the new features but not actually release until we are a little more sure that the product is stable and well tested. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Bodington-developers mailing list Bod...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2005-07-22 14:58:14
|
Whoa there nellies! Why can't we work until Wed. On wed we chop off new stuff. This is the plan as it presently stands. Then we can take a day or three to finish some quick testing. Then we can finalize this and have 2.6 out a week or so after we said, which is pretty good. We have already promised to deploy the 2.6 here at UHI mid August. We must adhere to this as people need access to the new tool set at that time. They have already planned on it (e.g. Bookmarks). s On 22 Jul 2005, at 15:51, Adam Marshall wrote: > Why not release it as 2.5. As this is what it is! > > adam > > -----Original Message----- > From: bod...@li... > [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of > Matthew Buckett > Sent: 22 July 2005 14:43 > To: bod...@li... > Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] creationmenu.html problem > > Alistair Young wrote: > >>> Language has no meaning for legacy templates >>> >> >> ah! thanks for clarifying, makes sense now! >> >> >>> Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further >>> investigation >>> >> >> I updated my bod with the templates I got from head today, there was >> only about a day's difference but it works now. >> >> too much going on in head to do meaningful testing methinks. >> > > Indeed. I am worried that it we attempt an official Bodington 2.6 > release at the end of this month it is likley to be buggy because > of the > large number of changes that have happened over a short period of > time. > > As a halfway house could we make a release candidate available at the > end of July that contains most of the new features but not actually > release until we are a little more sure that the product is stable and > well tested. > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |
|
From: Colin T. <col...@co...> - 2005-07-22 15:24:58
|
> Then we can take a day or three to finish some quick testing. And there's the rub. I certainly wouldn't like to be running 2.6 after a few quick tests, on our live server. It's going to be difficult enough working out how to test, and then there's the bug fixing! Release candidate sounds like a good idea to me. As I've said, releasing a bad build, that everyone's been waiting for, is a bad idea even from a marketing perspective... (release candidate doesn't solve UHI's deploying 2.6 in mid Aug though...) Colin ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org Sean Mehan wrote: > Whoa there nellies! > > > Why can't we work until Wed. On wed we chop off new stuff. This is the > plan as it presently stands. > > Then we can take a day or three to finish some quick testing. > > Then we can finalize this and have 2.6 out a week or so after we said, > which is pretty good. > > We have already promised to deploy the 2.6 here at UHI mid August. We > must adhere to this as people need access to the new tool set at that > time. They have already planned on it (e.g. Bookmarks). > > s > > > On 22 Jul 2005, at 15:51, Adam Marshall wrote: > >> Why not release it as 2.5. As this is what it is! >> >> adam >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: bod...@li... >> [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of >> Matthew Buckett >> Sent: 22 July 2005 14:43 >> To: bod...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] creationmenu.html problem >> >> Alistair Young wrote: >> >>>> Language has no meaning for legacy templates >>>> >>> >>> ah! thanks for clarifying, makes sense now! >>> >>> >>>> Try running the purge-templates build.xml target prior to further >>>> investigation >>>> >>> >>> I updated my bod with the templates I got from head today, there was >>> only about a day's difference but it works now. >>> >>> too much going on in head to do meaningful testing methinks. >>> >> >> Indeed. I am worried that it we attempt an official Bodington 2.6 >> release at the end of this month it is likley to be buggy because of the >> large number of changes that have happened over a short period of time. >> >> As a halfway house could we make a release candidate available at the >> end of July that contains most of the new features but not actually >> release until we are a little more sure that the product is stable and >> well tested. >> >> -- >> +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ >> | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | >> | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | >> +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies >> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, >> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to >> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies >> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, >> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to >> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X