Menu
▾
▴
bodington-developers
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-06-06 15:11:43
Attachments:
admin_upload.txt
|
Bodington by default doesn't allow UPLOAD rights to admins although they can add themselves (as they have MANAGE rights). I have changed this in the WebLearn tree. Is there a reason why this was the case? Should I push this change across to Bodington? -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2005-06-06 15:18:43
|
Sounds a good idea. While you are at it, could you make owners have MARK privilege by default in pigeonholes and short answer papers? Aggie -----Original Message----- From: bod...@li... [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of Matthew Buckett Sent: 06 June 2005 16:12 To: Bodington Developers Subject: [Bodington-developers] Allowing UPLOAD rights to Admins/Sysadmin Bodington by default doesn't allow UPLOAD rights to admins although they can add themselves (as they have MANAGE rights). I have changed this in the WebLearn tree. Is there a reason why this was the case? Should I push this change across to Bodington? -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-06-06 15:23:22
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > Sounds a good idea. While you are at it, could you make owners have MARK > privilege by default in pigeonholes and short answer papers? I think thats in our list as well :-) I'll have a look at it in the next few days hopefully. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-06-06 16:05:00
|
Matthew Buckett wrote:
> Andrew Booth wrote:
>
>> Sounds a good idea. While you are at it, could you make owners have MARK
>> privilege by default in pigeonholes and short answer papers?
>
>
> I think thats in our list as well :-) I'll have a look at it in the next
> few days hopefully.
I'm going mad. I'd actually fixed that in WebLearn HEAD already! This
was the method I added to PigeonHoleFacility:
> /**
> * Setup the PigeonHole resource to a sensible state. We add Record, Mark
> * and Review Permissions to the owner for this.
> */
> public boolean create(Request request, Connection connection,
> Resource resource)
> {
> try
> {
> Acl acl = resource.getAcl();
> if (acl != null)
> {
> AclEntry aclEntry = acl.getOwnerGroupAclEntry();
> if (aclEntry != null)
> {
> aclEntry.addPermission(Permission.RECORD);
> aclEntry.addPermission(Permission.MARK);
> aclEntry.addPermission(Permission.REVIEW);
> return true;
> }
> }
> log.warn("Resource doesn't have default ACLs");
> }
> catch (BuildingServerException bse)
> {
> log.warn("Could not get ACL details for: " + resource);
> }
> return false;
>
> }
--
+--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+
| VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group |
| Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ |
+------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+
|
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2005-06-08 13:12:40
|
Has anyone tried IBM Cloudscape (now Apache Derby) with Bodington? It is a Java-based SQL RDMS originally developed by Cloudscape, then purchased by IBM and finally donated to Apache as the open-source Derby. At first sight it looks like it might be a reasonable candidate for = bundling with Bod. Possibly more suitable for a production Bod than hSQL? Aggie |
|
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-06-08 13:27:23
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > Has anyone tried IBM Cloudscape (now Apache Derby) with Bodington? > > It is a Java-based SQL RDMS originally developed by Cloudscape, then > purchased by IBM and finally donated to Apache as the open-source Derby. > > At first sight it looks like it might be a reasonable candidate for bundling > with Bod. Possibly more suitable for a production Bod than hSQL? > > Aggie > I think Derby is definitely worth a look, but I think for database choices the emphasis should still be HSQLDB for evaluation (single user), PostgreSQL / MS SQL / Oracle for production (possibly hundreds of concurrent users). I'm not convinced Derby would scale for the latter case and in the former case is not as lightweight! (I don't think it can be run in memory for instance). Alexis |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-06-08 13:29:29
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > Has anyone tried IBM Cloudscape (now Apache Derby) with Bodington? Not me. > It is a Java-based SQL RDMS originally developed by Cloudscape, then > purchased by IBM and finally donated to Apache as the open-source Derby. http://incubator.apache.org/derby/ > At first sight it looks like it might be a reasonable candidate for bundling > with Bod. Possibly more suitable for a production Bod than hSQL? Dunno. My quick glance suggests that it doesn't have those bitwise operators (manual may be out of date) which Bodington currently needs. More than that I don't know anything about it. The reason I orginally picked HSQLDB was I'd heard of it and other products (uPortal) used it in a similar way (quickstart) to the way I was looking to. If derby looks better I'm all for updating but I can't see any reason to change. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X