[Blosxom-devel] Blosxom test suite! (Also: Fwd: [blosxom] Entry-specific Permalinks)

[Kevin S. <ke...@sc...>]

Over the last couple days, I've been working on the beginnings of a 
test suite for blosxom.  It's in CVS now, so please have a look.   It's 
very simple current, and doesn't have all the features I'd like, but it 
works as a proof of concept, I think.

I figured that this issue would be a good trial to see if I could 
reproduce the problem in a test case.  Now, it turns out that this 
really does work as Paul desired, and he had just messed something up, 
but the thing that's bugging me is that I can't prove that it works 
with the test suite.  If you run the test driver, you should see one 
test failing, which attempts to run "blosxom.cgi /foo/bar.html".  If I 
correctly understand the CGI.pm docs, this should simulate requesting 
"blosxom.cgi/foo/bar.html" in a browser.  However, they seem to do 
different things.

Does anyone know more about using the command line debugging features 
of CGI.pm?


-kevin


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Kevin Scaldeferri <ke...@sc...>
> Date: July 25, 2006 10:37:52 AM PDT
> To: bl...@ya...
> Subject: Re: [blosxom] Entry-specific Permalinks
> Reply-To: bl...@ya...
>
> I would have thought that either 2.0.1 or 2.0.2 would do it.  See, for
> example, my installation:
>
> http://kevin.scaldeferri.com/blog/2006/07/19/
> http://kevin.scaldeferri.com/blog/2006/07/19/BlosxomTestingStart.html
> http://kevin.scaldeferri.com/blog/2006/07/19/Bloxsom_2_0_2.html
>
> That's what you want, right?
>
> Are you using the dynamic mode, or static mode?  Or one of the hybrid
> implementations?
>
> I checked and there is a very small difference between my installed
> blosxom.cgi and the 2.0.2 version.  It's actually not obvious to me why
> I made the change, and it's possible that it was to get this exact
> behavior.  I'll investigate that and get back to you about it.
>
>
> -kevin
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Paul O'Leary McCann wrote:
>
>> 2.0.1, so it is a bit old. By "latest versions" you mean 2.0.2 or 3?
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:49:20 +0500, Kevin Scaldeferri
>> <ke...@sc...> wrote:
>>
>>> What blosxom version are you running?  I believe that the latest
>>> versions ought to be working as you desire, so I'm wondering if 
>>> you're
>>> still running the old 2.0.0 release.
>>>
>>>
>>> -kevin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Paul O'Leary McCann wrote:
>>>
>>>> That works, which is good, but not as I'd like it too, which isn't.
>>>> It
>>>> goes to the proper entry, but what I'd like to happen is have it
>>>> load a
>>>> page where that is the *only* entry displayed.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:52:51 +0500, simon <bea...@zo...> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Remember always the last words of Pancho Villa:
>>>> "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."
>>>>
>>>> 2 3   S K I D D O O
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Remember always the last words of Pancho Villa:
>> "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."
>>
>> 2 3   S K I D D O O
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/WktRrD/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/dpFolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/blosxom/
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     blo...@ya...
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>